Literature DB >> 25246174

Biomechanical characteristics of bioabsorbable magnesium-based (MgYREZr-alloy) interference screws with different threads.

Marco Ezechieli1, Max Ettinger2, Carolin König2, Andreas Weizbauer2,3, Patrick Helmecke4, Robert Schavan5, Arne Lucas5, Henning Windhagen2, Christoph Becher2.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Degradable magnesium implants have received increasing interest in recent years. In anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction surgery, the well-known osteoconductive effects of biodegradable magnesium alloys may be useful. The aim of this study was to examine whether interference screws made of MgYREZr have comparable biomechanical properties to commonly used biodegradable screws and whether a different thread on the magnesium screw has an influence on the fixation strength.
METHODS: Five magnesium (MgYREZr-alloy) screws were tested per group. Three different groups with variable thread designs (Designs 1, 2, and 3) were produced and compared with the commercially available bioabsorbable Bioacryl rapid polylactic-co-glycolic acid screw Milagro®. In vitro testing was performed in synthetic bone using artificial ligament fixed by an interference screw. The constructs were pretensioned with a constant load of 60 N for 30 s followed by 500 cycles between 60 N and 250 N at 1 Hz. Construct displacements between the 1st and 20th and the 21st and 500th cycles were recorded. After a 30 s break, a maximum load to failure test was performed at 1 mm/s measuring the maximum pull-out force.
RESULTS: The maximum loads to failure of all three types of magnesium interference screws (Design 1: 1,092 ± 133.7 N; Design 2: 1,014 ± 103.3 N; Design 3: 1,001 ± 124 N) were significantly larger than that of the bioabsorbable Milagro® interference screw (786.8 ± 62.5 N) (p < 0.05). However, the greatest maximum load was found with magnesium screw Design 1. Except for a significant difference between Designs 1 and 2, there were no further significant differences among the four groups in displacement after the 20th cycle.
CONCLUSIONS: Biomechanical testing showed higher pull-out forces for magnesium compared with a commercial polymer screw. Hence, they suggest better stability and are a potential alternative. The thread geometry does not significantly influence the stability provided by the magnesium implants. This study shows the first promising results of a degradable material, which may be a clinical alternative in the future.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Anterior cruciate ligament; Biomechanics; Interference screw; Magnesium

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25246174     DOI: 10.1007/s00167-014-3325-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc        ISSN: 0942-2056            Impact factor:   4.342


  24 in total

1.  Mechanical evaluation of a soft tissue interference screw in free tendon anterior cruciate ligament graft fixation.

Authors:  D G Nagarkatti; B P McKeon; B S Donahue; J P Fulkerson
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2001 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 6.202

2.  Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with bioabsorbable polyglycolic acid interference screws: MR imaging follow-up.

Authors:  Fabienne D Bach; Robert Y Carlier; Jean B Elis; Dominique M Mompoint; Antoine Feydy; Olivia Judet; Philippe Beaufils; Christian Vallée
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 11.105

Review 3.  Intraarticular migration of a broken biodegradable interference screw after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Authors:  M H Baums; B A Zelle; W Schultz; T Ernstberger; H-M Klinger
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2006-02-15       Impact factor: 4.342

4.  Effects of initial graft tension on clinical outcome after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Autogenous doubled hamstring tendons connected in series with polyester tapes.

Authors:  K Yasuda; J Tsujino; Y Tanabe; K Kaneda
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  1997 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 6.202

5.  The mechanics of the knee joint in relation to normal walking.

Authors:  J B Morrison
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  1970-01       Impact factor: 2.712

Review 6.  Magnesium and its alloys as orthopedic biomaterials: a review.

Authors:  Mark P Staiger; Alexis M Pietak; Jerawala Huadmai; George Dias
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2005-10-24       Impact factor: 12.479

7.  [Transplant fixation by anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Metal vs. bioabsorbable polyglyconate interference screw. A prospective randomized study of 40 patients].

Authors:  W Hackl; C Fink; K P Benedetto; C Hoser
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 1.000

8.  The migration of a BioScrew as a differential diagnosis of knee pain, locking after ACL reconstruction: a report of two cases.

Authors:  Ferdinand Anton Krappel; Eberhardt Bauer; Ulrich Harland
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2006-02-03       Impact factor: 3.067

9.  The fixation strength of tibial PCL press-fit reconstructions.

Authors:  M Ettinger; T Wehrhahn; M Petri; E Liodakis; G Olender; U-V Albrecht; C Hurschler; C Krettek; M Jagodzinski
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2011-06-22       Impact factor: 4.342

10.  Synovitis of the knee after intraarticular fracture fixation with Biofix. Report of two cases.

Authors:  G Barfod; R N Svendsen
Journal:  Acta Orthop Scand       Date:  1992-12
View more
  10 in total

Review 1.  A review of current challenges and prospects of magnesium and its alloy for bone implant applications.

Authors:  Meysam Nasr Azadani; Abolfazl Zahedi; Oluwole Kingsley Bowoto; Bankole Ibrahim Oladapo
Journal:  Prog Biomater       Date:  2022-03-03

2.  Bioabsorbable implants in forefoot surgery: a review of materials, possibilities and disadvantages.

Authors:  Lorenz Pisecky; Matthias Luger; Antonio Klasan; Tobias Gotterbarm; Matthias C Klotz; Rainer Hochgatterer
Journal:  EFORT Open Rev       Date:  2021-12-10

3.  Effect of Rolling Treatment on Microstructure, Mechanical Properties, and Corrosion Properties of WE43 Alloy.

Authors:  Bo Deng; Yilong Dai; Jianguo Lin; Dechuang Zhang
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2022-06-03       Impact factor: 3.748

4.  Objective Evaluation of Motor Skills for Orthopedic Residents Using a Motion Tracking Drill System: Outcomes of an ABOS Approved Surgical Skills Training Program.

Authors:  Ashkan Pourkand; Christina Salas; Jasmin Regalado; Krishan Bhakta; Rachel Tufaro; Deana Mercer; David Grow
Journal:  Iowa Orthop J       Date:  2016

5.  Biomechanical Properties of a Novel Biodegradable Magnesium-Based Interference Screw.

Authors:  Marco Ezechieli; Hanna Meyer; Arne Lucas; Patrick Helmecke; Christoph Becher; Tilman Calliess; Henning Windhagen; Max Ettinger
Journal:  Orthop Rev (Pavia)       Date:  2016-06-27

6.  A Case of Implant Failure in Partial Wrist Fusion Applying Magnesium-Based Headless Bone Screws.

Authors:  Alice Wichelhaus; Judith Emmerich; Thomas Mittlmeier
Journal:  Case Rep Orthop       Date:  2016-10-05

7.  Does thread shape affect the fixation strength of the bioabsorbable interference screws for anterior cruciate ligament reconstructions? A biomechanical study.

Authors:  Gerardo L Garcés; Oscar Martel; Alejandro Yánez; Alberto Cuadrado
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2019-02-08       Impact factor: 2.362

Review 8.  Mapping knowledge structure and themes trends of biodegradable Mg-based alloy for orthopedic application: A comprehensive bibliometric analysis.

Authors:  Zitian Zheng; Wennan Xu; Yanan Xu; Qingyun Xue
Journal:  Front Bioeng Biotechnol       Date:  2022-08-09

9.  Treatment of Knee Osteochondral Fractures.

Authors:  Mihai Alexandru Cordunianu; Iulian Antoniac; Marius Niculescu; Gheorghe Paltanea; Anca Daniela Raiciu; Horatiu Dura; Norin Forna; Ioana Dana Carstoc; Mihai Bogdan Cristea
Journal:  Healthcare (Basel)       Date:  2022-06-08

10.  Use of resorbable magnesium screws in children: systematic review of the literature and short-term follow-up from our series.

Authors:  Marco Baldini; Valentino Coppa; Danya Falcioni; Elisa Senigagliesi; Mario Marinelli; Antonio Pompilio Gigante
Journal:  J Child Orthop       Date:  2021-06-01       Impact factor: 1.548

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.