| Literature DB >> 25245523 |
Xiaohua Feng1, Qianbing Zhang2, Songxin Xia3, Bing Xia4, Yue Zhang5, Xubin Deng6, Wenmei Su7, Jianqing Huang8.
Abstract
Themetastasis-associated gene 1 (MTA1) oncogene hasbeen suggested to be involved in the regulation of cancer progression. However, there is still no direct evidence that MTA1 regulates cisplatin (CDDP) resistance, as well as cancer stem cell properties. In this study, we found that MTA1 was enriched in CNE1/CDDP cells. Knock down of MTA1 in CNE1/CDDP cells reversed CSCs properties and CDDP resistance. However, ectopic expression of MTA1 in CNE1 cells induced CSCs phenotypes and CDDP insensitivity. Interestingly, ectopic overexpression of MTA1-induced CSCs properties and CDDP resistance were reversed in CNE1 cells after inhibition of PI3K/Akt by LY294002. In addition, MTA1 expression and Akt activity in CNE1/CDDP cells was much higher than that in CNE1 cells. These results suggested that MTA1 may play a critical role in promoting CDDP resistance in NPC cells by regulatingcancer stem cell properties via thePI3K/Akt signaling pathway. Our findings suggested that MTA1 may be a potential target for overcoming CDDP resistance in NPC therapy.Entities:
Keywords: MTA1; cancer stem cell; cisplatin-resistance; nasopharyngeal carcinoma
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2014 PMID: 25245523 PMCID: PMC4179139 DOI: 10.14348/molcells.2014.0029
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Mol Cells ISSN: 1016-8478 Impact factor: 5.034
Fig. 1.(A) Compared with the parental CNE1 cells, CNE1/CDDP cells were resistant to CDDP. (B) The diluted sphere forming assay showed that the self-renewal ability was significantly higher in CNE1/CDDP cells than that in their parental CNE1 cells. (C) The FACS analysis showed that SOX2- and Nanog-positive cell populations were higher in CNE1/CDDP cells than that in their parental CNE1 cells.
Fig. 2.(A) Both the mRNA and protein levels of MTA1 in CNE1/CDDP cells were significantly higher than those in their parental cells. (B) Knockdown of MTA1 in CNE1/CDDP cells overcome CDDP resistance. (C) Knockdown of MTA1 expression reduced the self-renewal ability of CNE1/CDDP cells. (D) Knockdown of MTA1 reduced the SOX2- and Nanog-positive cell populations in CNE1/CDDP cells.
Fig. 3.(A–C) MTA1 overexpression decreased CDDP efficacy, accompanied by increased self-renewal ability and increased SOX2- and Nanog-positive cell populations CNE1 cells. However, these effects were reversed or blocked by additional LY294002 treatment after 48-h incubation. (D) MTA1 overexpression could significantly stimulate PI3K/Akt signaling. (E) Akt activity in CNE1/CDDP cells was much higher than that in CNE1 cells.
Fig. 4.MTA1 knockdown inhibites NPC tumorigenesis and increases CDDP sensitivity in CNE1/CDDP xenograft tumor-harbored nude mice. (A) The tumor growth rate was inhibited when MTA1 was knocked down, especially combined the use of CDDP. (B) The size of the xenografts derived from CNE1/CDDP sh-MTA1 cells were much smaller than that from sh-Ctrl treated cells after receiving the same doses of CDDP or CNE1/CDDP sh-MTA1 cells treated with DMSO.