Literature DB >> 2524544

Word-fragment cuing: the lexical search hypothesis.

D L Nelson1, P D Keelean, M Negrao.   

Abstract

In four experiments we evaluated aspects of the hypothesis that word-fragment completion depends on the results of lexical but not semantic search. Experiment 1 showed that the number of meaningful associates linked to a studied word does not affect its recovery when the test cue consists of letters and spaces for missing letters. Experiments 2 and 3 showed retroactive interference effects in fragment completion when words in a second list were lexically related to words in a first list but not when the words in the second list were meaningfully related. Experiment 4 indicated that for studied words, instructions to search at the word level facilitated completion performance and that instructions to generate letters to fill missing spaces had no effect. Other findings indicated that completion was affected by the number of words lexically related to the fragment and by the number of letters missing from the fragment. In general, experimental manipulations that focused on lexical characteristics were effective, and those that focused on semantic characteristics were ineffective. The findings support the conclusion that word fragments engender a lexical search process that does not depend on retrieving encoded meaning.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2524544     DOI: 10.1037//0278-7393.15.3.388

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn        ISSN: 0278-7393            Impact factor:   3.051


  6 in total

1.  The retrieval of controlled and automatic aspects of meaning on direct and indirect tests.

Authors:  D L Nelson; T A Schreiber; P E Holley
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1992-11

2.  Sentence encoding and implicitly activated memories.

Authors:  D L Nelson; N R Gee; T A Schreiber
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1992-11

3.  Dissociative effects in different prime domains.

Authors:  D L Nelson; M J LaLomia; J J Canas
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1991-01

Review 4.  Memory systems do not divide on consciousness: Reinterpreting memory in terms of activation and binding.

Authors:  Lynne M Reder; Heekyeong Park; Paul D Kieffaber
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 17.737

5.  Effects of saccadic bilateral eye movements on episodic and semantic autobiographical memory fluency.

Authors:  Andrew Parker; Adam Parkin; Neil Dagnall
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2013-09-26       Impact factor: 3.169

6.  STOP SHOUTING AT ME: The Influence of Case and Self-Referencing on Explicit and Implicit Memory.

Authors:  George O Ilenikhena; Haajra Narmawala; Allison M Sklenar; Matthew P McCurdy; Angela H Gutchess; Eric D Leshikar
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2021-06-09
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.