Meagan Elizabeth Brennan1,2, Phyllis Butow3, Andrew John Spillane1,4, Frances Boyle1,2. 1. Northern Clinical School, Sydney Medical School, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia. 2. The Patricia Ritchie Centre for Cancer Care and Research, The Mater Hospital, North Sydney, New South Wales, Australia. 3. Psycho-oncology Co-operative Research Group (PoCoG), The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia. 4. Royal North Shore and Mater Hospitals, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Abstract
AIM: Survivorship care plans (SCPs) have been proposed for universal use with the aim of addressing the many unmet needs of cancer survivors. Trials have failed to find a significant impact of SCPs on quality of life outcomes. This study evaluated quality of life, unmet needs, satisfaction with health care and perception of cancer care coordination at the end of treatment in a cohort of women at the end of treatment for early breast cancer. The aim was to identify specific needs to assist in the design of a tailored SCP. METHODS: Women completed patient-reported measures of health-related quality of life (FACT-B [ES]), unmet needs (CaSUN), satisfaction with medical care and cancer care coordination. Total scores and subscale scores for the whole cohort and results of analysis comparing three age groups were reported. RESULTS: Sixty-eight women (mean age 56) participated. Mean score for FACT-B = 108 and FACT-B (ES) = 167.4. Younger women (<51 years) reported a significantly lower quality of life (P = 0.001 for FACT-B, TOI and FACT-B [ES]). Using CaSUN, 76.1% of participants reported at least one unmet need; mean number of unmet needs = 6.2. Younger women reported more unmet needs than older women. The most frequently reported unmet need was fear of cancer recurrence. Overall, participants were very satisfied with medical care and cancer care coordination. CONCLUSION: Younger women reported poorer quality of life and more unmet needs. SCPs should specifically target younger women and must include strategies to address fear of cancer recurrence if they are to lead to a measureable difference in outcomes.
AIM: Survivorship care plans (SCPs) have been proposed for universal use with the aim of addressing the many unmet needs of cancer survivors. Trials have failed to find a significant impact of SCPs on quality of life outcomes. This study evaluated quality of life, unmet needs, satisfaction with health care and perception of cancer care coordination at the end of treatment in a cohort of women at the end of treatment for early breast cancer. The aim was to identify specific needs to assist in the design of a tailored SCP. METHODS:Women completed patient-reported measures of health-related quality of life (FACT-B [ES]), unmet needs (CaSUN), satisfaction with medical care and cancer care coordination. Total scores and subscale scores for the whole cohort and results of analysis comparing three age groups were reported. RESULTS: Sixty-eight women (mean age 56) participated. Mean score for FACT-B = 108 and FACT-B (ES) = 167.4. Younger women (<51 years) reported a significantly lower quality of life (P = 0.001 for FACT-B, TOI and FACT-B [ES]). Using CaSUN, 76.1% of participants reported at least one unmet need; mean number of unmet needs = 6.2. Younger women reported more unmet needs than older women. The most frequently reported unmet need was fear of cancer recurrence. Overall, participants were very satisfied with medical care and cancer care coordination. CONCLUSION: Younger women reported poorer quality of life and more unmet needs. SCPs should specifically target younger women and must include strategies to address fear of cancer recurrence if they are to lead to a measureable difference in outcomes.
Authors: Amy E Ustjanauskas; Gwendolyn P Quinn; Tonya M Pan; Maria Rivera; Coralia Vázquez-Otero; Danielle Ung; Richard G Roetzheim; Christine Laronga; Kenneth Johnson; Marilyn Norton; Claudia Carrizosa; Dariana Muñoz; Marissa Goldenstein; Sumayah Nuhaily; Kristen J Wells Journal: J Cancer Educ Date: 2017-12 Impact factor: 2.037
Authors: Lynn Batehup; Heather Gage; Peter Williams; Alison Richardson; Katerina Porter; Peter Simmonds; Elizabeth Lowson; Lynne Dodson; Nicola Davies; Richard Wagland; Jane Winter; Andrew Turner; Jessica Corner Journal: Eur J Cancer Care (Engl) Date: 2021-08-22 Impact factor: 2.328
Authors: Kerri-Anne R Mitchell; Kelly J Brassil; Kayo Fujimoto; Bryan M Fellman; Laura Aubree Shay; Andrew E Springer Journal: Value Health Date: 2019-12-09 Impact factor: 5.725
Authors: Kathy Pan; Rowan T Chlebowski; Michael S Simon; Roberta M Ray; Jennifer Livaudais-Toman; Shannon D Sullivan; Marcia L Stefanick; Robert B Wallace; Meryl LeBoff; Elizabeth Carhart Bluhm; Electra D Paskett Journal: Breast Cancer Res Treat Date: 2016-04-13 Impact factor: 4.872
Authors: M C Keeman; C A W Bolman; I Mesters; R A Willems; I M Kanera; L Lechner Journal: Eur J Cancer Care (Engl) Date: 2018-01-22 Impact factor: 2.520
Authors: Rebecca Selove; Sarah A Birken; Ted A Skolarus; Erin E Hahn; Anne Sales; Enola K Proctor Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2016-09-30 Impact factor: 44.544