BACKGROUND: A valid biomarker is 'an indicator of normal biologic or pathogenic processes, or pharmacological responses to a therapeutic intervention'. There is no validated biomarker for irritable bowel syndrome (IBS). The aim of the study was to assess ability of three quantitative traits to identify treatable processes to discriminate between IBS-diarrhea (IBS-D) patients, IBS-constipation (IBS-C) patients and healthy volunteers (HV). METHODS: In 30 HV, 30 IBS-C patients and 64 IBS-D patients, we characterized bowel symptoms and quantitated pathophysiological mechanisms: bile acid (BA) synthesis (serum C4 and FGF19), fecal BA and fat, colonic transit (CT), and intestinal permeability (IP). We used multiple logistic regression and receiver-operating characteristic (ROCAUC ) to appraise three factors (fecal BA, CT, and IP) individually and in combination to identify discriminant targets for treatment in IBS. KEY RESULTS: There were significant associations between the three subgroups and symptoms reflecting bowel function and the quantitative traits. There were significant associations between fecal BA and CT at 48 h (r = 0.43; p < 0.001) and between fecal BA and IP (r = 0.23; p = 0.015). Individually, fecal BA and CT48 (but not IP) were significant independent predictors for distinguishing HV from IBS. In combination, they discriminated HV from IBS-D patients (ROCAUC 0.70), HV from IBS-C patients (ROCAUC 0.73), and IBS-C patients from IBS-D patients (ROCAUC 0.86). Colonic transit and fecal BA excretion together discriminate between healthy volunteers and IBS-C patients or IBS-D patients, or between the IBS subgroups with 75-90% specificity at 60% sensitivity. CONCLUSIONS & INFERENCES: Colonic transit and fecal BA individually and together constitute useful biomarkers to identify treatable mechanisms in IBS and to differentiate subgroups of IBS.
BACKGROUND: A valid biomarker is 'an indicator of normal biologic or pathogenic processes, or pharmacological responses to a therapeutic intervention'. There is no validated biomarker for irritable bowel syndrome (IBS). The aim of the study was to assess ability of three quantitative traits to identify treatable processes to discriminate between IBS-diarrhea (IBS-D) patients, IBS-constipation (IBS-C)patients and healthy volunteers (HV). METHODS: In 30 HV, 30 IBS-Cpatients and 64 IBS-Dpatients, we characterized bowel symptoms and quantitated pathophysiological mechanisms: bile acid (BA) synthesis (serum C4 and FGF19), fecal BA and fat, colonic transit (CT), and intestinal permeability (IP). We used multiple logistic regression and receiver-operating characteristic (ROCAUC ) to appraise three factors (fecal BA, CT, and IP) individually and in combination to identify discriminant targets for treatment in IBS. KEY RESULTS: There were significant associations between the three subgroups and symptoms reflecting bowel function and the quantitative traits. There were significant associations between fecal BA and CT at 48 h (r = 0.43; p < 0.001) and between fecal BA and IP (r = 0.23; p = 0.015). Individually, fecal BA and CT48 (but not IP) were significant independent predictors for distinguishing HV from IBS. In combination, they discriminated HV from IBS-Dpatients (ROCAUC 0.70), HV from IBS-Cpatients (ROCAUC 0.73), and IBS-Cpatients from IBS-Dpatients (ROCAUC 0.86). Colonic transit and fecal BA excretion together discriminate between healthy volunteers and IBS-Cpatients or IBS-Dpatients, or between the IBS subgroups with 75-90% specificity at 60% sensitivity. CONCLUSIONS & INFERENCES: Colonic transit and fecal BA individually and together constitute useful biomarkers to identify treatable mechanisms in IBS and to differentiate subgroups of IBS.
Authors: M P Jones; W D Chey; S Singh; H Gong; R Shringarpure; N Hoe; E Chuang; N J Talley Journal: Aliment Pharmacol Ther Date: 2014-01-06 Impact factor: 8.171
Authors: N Manabe; B S Wong; M Camilleri; D Burton; S McKinzie; A R Zinsmeister Journal: Neurogastroenterol Motil Date: 2009-12-21 Impact factor: 3.598
Authors: Archana S Rao; Banny S Wong; Michael Camilleri; Suwebatu T Odunsi-Shiyanbade; Sanna McKinzie; Michael Ryks; Duane Burton; Paula Carlson; Jesse Lamsam; Ravinder Singh; Alan R Zinsmeister Journal: Gastroenterology Date: 2010-08-04 Impact factor: 22.682
Authors: Michael Camilleri; Sanna McKinzie; Irene Busciglio; Phillip A Low; Seth Sweetser; Duane Burton; Kari Baxter; Michael Ryks; Alan R Zinsmeister Journal: Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol Date: 2008-05-05 Impact factor: 11.382
Authors: B Le Nevé; I Posserud; L Böhn; D Guyonnet; P Rondeau; K Tillisch; B Naliboff; E A Mayer; M Simrén Journal: Am J Gastroenterol Date: 2013-04-16 Impact factor: 10.864
Authors: Maria I Vazquez-Roque; Michael Camilleri; Thomas Smyrk; Joseph A Murray; Eric Marietta; Jessica O'Neill; Paula Carlson; Jesse Lamsam; Denise Janzow; Deborah Eckert; Duane Burton; Alan R Zinsmeister Journal: Gastroenterology Date: 2013-01-25 Impact factor: 22.682
Authors: M Camilleri; A Nadeau; W J Tremaine; J Lamsam; D Burton; S Odunsi; S Sweetser; R Singh Journal: Neurogastroenterol Motil Date: 2009-03-13 Impact factor: 3.598
Authors: Ruchit Sood; Michael Camilleri; David J Gracie; Matthew J Gold; Natalie To; Graham R Law; Alexander C Ford Journal: Am J Gastroenterol Date: 2016-08-02 Impact factor: 10.864
Authors: P Vijayvargiya; M Camilleri; P Carlson; A Lueke; J O'Neill; D Burton; I Busciglio; L Donato Journal: Aliment Pharmacol Ther Date: 2017-07-10 Impact factor: 8.171