OBJECTIVES: The aim of the present pilot study was to evaluate the usefulness of a test meal containing lactulose in the non-invasive assessment of visceral sensitivity in irritable bowel syndrome (IBS), and to identify subsets of IBS patients based on gastrointestinal (GI) symptom generation. METHODS: We included 43 patients with IBS (Rome III) and 29 healthy controls. The fasted subjects were served three test meals consisting of a 400-ml liquid breakfast alone or containing lactulose (15 or 25 g) in a double-blind crossover design. Seven GI symptoms, overall digestive comfort, and exhaled H2/CH4 were assessed at baseline and every 15 min during 4 h after meal intake. Anxiety and depression were assessed only at baseline. A mapping of the seven GI symptoms was done using a Principal Component Analysis (4 h mean area under the curve, AUC). Independently, a hierarchical cluster analysis was performed on the same parameters to identify GI symptom-based IBS clusters. RESULTS: All three tests were well tolerated. The 25 g lactulose challenge enabled discrimination of IBS from healthy controls according to the symptom response. This challenge also enabled clustering of IBS subjects in two subgroups based mainly on bloating, distension, and discomfort symptoms (2,457 (2,043-2,872), 2,450 (1,910-2,990), 2,602 (2,126-3,079) vs. 537 (383-691), 619 (458-780), 643 (432-854); 4 h mean AUC; P<0.0001), overall digestive comfort (1807 (1318-2295) vs. 3350 (2942-3758); 4 h mean AUC; P<0.0001), and anxiety at baseline (9.2 (7.0-11.5) vs. 5.5 (4.2-6.9); Hospital Anxiety and Depression scale anxiety mean scores; P=0.003). This clustering was independent of the Rome III subtype and the amount of exhaled H2/CH4. CONCLUSIONS: The lactulose challenge test seems to be a promising tool to assess visceral sensitivity in IBS, and to subgroup IBS patients based on their symptom pattern.
RCT Entities:
OBJECTIVES: The aim of the present pilot study was to evaluate the usefulness of a test meal containing lactulose in the non-invasive assessment of visceral sensitivity in irritable bowel syndrome (IBS), and to identify subsets of IBSpatients based on gastrointestinal (GI) symptom generation. METHODS: We included 43 patients with IBS (Rome III) and 29 healthy controls. The fasted subjects were served three test meals consisting of a 400-ml liquid breakfast alone or containing lactulose (15 or 25 g) in a double-blind crossover design. Seven GI symptoms, overall digestive comfort, and exhaled H2/CH4 were assessed at baseline and every 15 min during 4 h after meal intake. Anxiety and depression were assessed only at baseline. A mapping of the seven GI symptoms was done using a Principal Component Analysis (4 h mean area under the curve, AUC). Independently, a hierarchical cluster analysis was performed on the same parameters to identify GI symptom-based IBS clusters. RESULTS: All three tests were well tolerated. The 25 g lactulose challenge enabled discrimination of IBS from healthy controls according to the symptom response. This challenge also enabled clustering of IBS subjects in two subgroups based mainly on bloating, distension, and discomfort symptoms (2,457 (2,043-2,872), 2,450 (1,910-2,990), 2,602 (2,126-3,079) vs. 537 (383-691), 619 (458-780), 643 (432-854); 4 h mean AUC; P<0.0001), overall digestive comfort (1807 (1318-2295) vs. 3350 (2942-3758); 4 h mean AUC; P<0.0001), and anxiety at baseline (9.2 (7.0-11.5) vs. 5.5 (4.2-6.9); Hospital Anxiety and Depression scale anxiety mean scores; P=0.003). This clustering was independent of the Rome III subtype and the amount of exhaled H2/CH4. CONCLUSIONS: The lactulose challenge test seems to be a promising tool to assess visceral sensitivity in IBS, and to subgroup IBSpatients based on their symptom pattern.
Authors: M Camilleri; A Shin; I Busciglio; P Carlson; A Acosta; A E Bharucha; D Burton; J Lamsam; A Lueke; L J Donato; A R Zinsmeister Journal: Neurogastroenterol Motil Date: 2014-09-22 Impact factor: 3.598
Authors: Jennifer S Labus; Vadim Osadchiy; Elaine Y Hsiao; Julien Tap; Muriel Derrien; Arpana Gupta; Kirsten Tillisch; Boris Le Nevé; Cecilia Grinsvall; Maria Ljungberg; Lena Öhman; Hans Törnblom; Magnus Simren; Emeran A Mayer Journal: Microbiome Date: 2019-03-21 Impact factor: 14.650
Authors: Heinz F Hammer; Mark R Fox; Jutta Keller; Silvia Salvatore; Guido Basilisco; Johann Hammer; Loris Lopetuso; Marc Benninga; Osvaldo Borrelli; Dan Dumitrascu; Bruno Hauser; Laszlo Herszenyi; Radislav Nakov; Daniel Pohl; Nikhil Thapar; Marc Sonyi Journal: United European Gastroenterol J Date: 2021-08-25 Impact factor: 4.623