| Literature DB >> 25244012 |
Elżbieta Radziejewska-Kubzdela1, Róża Biegańska-Marecik2, Marcin Kidoń3.
Abstract
Vacuum impregnation is a non-destructive method of introducing a solution with a specific composition to the porous matrices of fruit and vegetables. Mass transfer in this process is a result of mechanically induced differences in pressure. Vacuum impregnation makes it possible to fill large volumes of intercellular spaces in tissues of fruit and vegetables, thus modifying physico-chemical properties and sensory attributes of products. This method may be used, e.g., to reduce pH and water activity of the product, change its thermal properties, improve texture, color, taste and aroma. Additionally, bioactive compounds may be introduced together with impregnating solutions, thus improving health-promoting properties of the product or facilitating production of functional food.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2014 PMID: 25244012 PMCID: PMC4200760 DOI: 10.3390/ijms150916577
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Mol Sci ISSN: 1422-0067 Impact factor: 5.923
Figure 1Hydrodynamic mechanism (HDM) and deformation-relaxation phenomena (DRP) contribute to the filling of ideal capillary with liquid during vacuum impregnation [6]. (t—Time; t’—Time required for internal and external pressure become equal; t1—Time of vacuum applied (vacuum time); t2—Time of atmospheric pressure (relaxation time); p0—Initial pressure; p1—Vacuum pressure; p2—Final pressure; pi—Internal pressure; pe—External pressure; pc—Capillary pressure; pat—Atmospheric pressure; Vg0—Initial volume of gas trapped into the capillary; Vg1A, Vg1B, Vg2—Volume of gas trapped into the capillary after each step of vacuum impregnation; Xc1—Increment of volume of gas trapped into the capillary as result of DRP; Xc—Decrement of volume of gas trapped into the capillary as result of DRP; Xv1—Partial decrement of volume of gas trapped into the capillary as result of HDM; Xv—Decrement of volume of gas trapped into the capillary as result of HDM).
Examples of applications of vacuum impregnation to modify physico–chemical properties and sensory attributes of products.
| Raw Material | Composition of Vacuum Impregnation Solutions | Process Parameters | Effect | References |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| peppers (slices of 15 cm in length and 1 cm in width) | lactic acid solution (pH 2.70) | solution:sample mass ratio of 5:1; | increase of the acidification degree in peppers | [ |
| mushrooms ( | lactic acid solution (pH 3.05) | solution:product ratio of 8:1; | increase of the acidification degree in mushrooms | [ |
| zucchini (slices of 1.5 cm in thickness and a diameter of 2.0 cm; the average weight of each slice was 5 g) | lactic acid solution (pH 2.70) | solution:product mass ratio of 8:1; | increase of the acidification degree in zucchini slices | [ |
| papayas (cut into 4 × 2.5 × 0.5 cm pieces (length × width × thickness)) | 55% and 65% ( | decrease of | [ | |
| strawberry | 65% ( | steam blanching or microwave and osmotic dehydration at atmospheric pressure or pulsed vacuum treatments | decrease of | [ |
| rabbiteye blueberries | aqueous sucrose solutions (600 g/kg) | solution:product ratio of 1:1; | shortenning of dehydratation time in comparison with soaking at atmospheric pressure | [ |
| plum (cut in slices of 4 × 1 × 1 cm, weighting approximately 10 g) | 40°, 50° and 60° Brix sucrose solution | solution:product ratio of 10:1; | new product with good visual quality and satisfactory shrinkage | [ |
| apples cv. (cultivar). Granny Smith (cylindrical samples (2 cm height and diameter)) | rectified grape must (hypertonic solutions: 65°, 50° and 30° Brix) and 3% ( | improvement of mechanical and structural properties of tissue, notable reduction of freezable water which could improve fruit resistance to freezing damage | [ | |
| strawberry (10 mm slices) | 50% ( | improvement of textural quality and reduced drip loss of frozen-thawed strawberries | [ | |
| spinach (rectangular 3.0 cm long, 0.5 cm wide and 0.06 cm thick) | 40% ( | pulsed electric fields (580 V/cm) in combination with vacuum impregnation | improvement of freezing tolerance of spinach leaves | [ |
| apple samples cv. Granny Smith (cylindrical samples (8 cm height and 2 cm diameter)) | sucrose isotonic solution | increase of thermal conductivity | [ | |
| zucchini (slices 0.5-cm thick) | maltodextrine solution (7.5%–9%, 10%), NaCl (0%–5%) and CaCl2 (0–1000 mM) | product:solution ratio of 1:3.3; | improvement of solute and water gain and limitation of textural and microstructural changes | [ |
| eggplant, carrot, oyster mushroom | 33 g sucrose and 20 g calcium lactate solution in isotonic solution | notable impact on mechanical behaviour of eggplant and carrot, no effects in oyster mushroom | [ | |
| apple samples cv. Granny Smith | CaCl2 solution (0.6%, 2.0% or 4.0% ( | improvement of texture | [ | |
| apple cv. Jonagold (cut into 1 cm thick slices) | 10 mg/L ascorbic acid, 0.05 mg/L 4-hexylresorcinol, 5 mg/L calcium chloride and 200 mg/L sucrose | the same effect of dipping and vacuum impregnation regarding hardness | [ | |
| apples cv. Granny Smith (1 cm cubes) strawberries (cut in halves) and raspberries | high methylated pectin solution preparation up to 3% ( | limitation of loss in fruit firmness following pasteurization | [ | |
| strawberries (cv. Elsanta and Darselect) (cut in halves) | high methylated pectin (from | limitation of structural damage during subsequent rapid freezing processes | [ | |
| peaches (cut in halves) | pectin methylesterase together with CaCl2 (100 mg/L) | increase of firmness in canned peaches | [ | |
| eggplants (slices of 1 cm trick) | pectinmethyl-esterase derived from | 1st method: | increase of firmness in impregnated eggplants | [ |
| 2nd method: pulsed vacuum impregnation | ||||
| release vacuum to atmospheric pressure for 1 min reapply vacuum for 5 min and release for 5 min | ||||
| watercress (leaves were selected diameter 1.4 cm) | winter flounder antifreeze protein type I solution (1 mg/100 mL AFP-I ultra pure water) | smaller ice crystals in AFP-I impregnated (58 kPa, for 5 min) frozen samples | [ | |
| strawberry | 12 g/100 g trehalose solution; 0.2 g/100 g solution unpasteurized cold acclimated winter wheat grass extract as a source of AFP and 12 g/100 g trehalose and 0.2 g/100 g unpasteurized cold acclimated winter wheat grass extract | improvement of freezing tolerance of strawberry | [ | |
| strawberry slices | CaCl2 solution (1, 10, 100 mM); spermine solution (1, 10, 100 mM); spermidine (1, 10, 100 mM); putrescine (1, 10, 100 mM); | effect of spermine and spermidine on the increase of firmness, whereas putrescine was not as effective | [ | |
| carrots (cv. Nantesa) slices (20-mm diameter, 10 mm thick) | chitosan (1%, | improvement of sample resistance to water vapor transmission, better preservation of color and mechanical response during cold storage | [ | |
| pineapple (slices 1 cm thickness) | chitosan- or casinate-based film-forming emulsions | ratio of the weight of coating solution:sample: 20:1; | extension of shelf-life in pineapple-cereal system for caseinate based coating | [ |
| pear ( | isotonic sucrose solution (14° Brix) containing trisodium citrate 2-hydrate, sodium | solution: fruit ratio of 20:1; | ascorbate and calcium lactate in impregnated solution were the most effective for extending the shelf life of pear | [ |
| apple cv. Jonagold (1-cm thick slices) | ascorbic acid, citric acid, 4-hexylresorcinol, sodium chloride, calcium chloride, sodium lactate, calcium lactate and sucrose solutions | effective inhibition of browning and softening of apple slices during storage by 1% ascorbic acid, 0.005% 4-hexylresorcinol, 0.5% calcium chloride, 20% sucrose in impregnated solution | [ | |
| button mushrooms (slice thickness was 6.5 mm with a 3 to 5 mm cap length) | 2 g/100 g ascorbic acid + 1 g/100 g calcium lactate solution; 2 g/100 g citric acid + 1 g/100 g calcium lactate; 1 g/100 g chitosan + 1 g/100 g calcium lactate solution; and 1 g/100 g calcium lactate solution | vacuum impregnation with ascorbic acid and calcium lactate at 6.7 kPa for 5 min and atmospheric restoration time of 5 min was the most effective to limit adverse changes of color in sliced button mushrooms | [ | |
| litchi cv. Rose | 502 g/kg sucrose solution containing 4.9 g/kg cysteine + 20 g/kg ascorbic acid + 0.134 g/kg 4-hexyl resorcinol and 502 g/kg sucrose solutions also contained 20 g/kg calcium lactate and 1 g/kg potassium sorbate | samples were sensory acceptable up to 24 days | [ | |
| apple sticks | mass ratio of fruit:syrup was 1:17; fructose isotonic solution (14.0°–15° Brix) containing ascorbic acid (0.5% | aroma enrichment | [ | |
| olive fruits cv. Domat | NaCl (3%), NaOH (1.5%) and NaOH (1.5%) + NaCl (3%) solutions | shortening the duration of debittering process | [ | |
| apples cv. Granny Smith and Stark Delicious | higher values of hardness, crispness, juiciness and sourness in vacuum impregnated Granny Smith apples | the solution:fruit ratio was 11:1; | higher values of hardness, crispness, juiciness and sourness in vacuum impregnated Granny Smith apples | [ |
p1—vacuum pressure in the Vacuum impregnation (VI) process; t1—time in reduced pressure; t2—time in atmospheric pressure.
Examples of applications of vacuum impregnation to modify health-promoting properties of fruit and vegetable products.
| Raw Material | Vacuum Impregnation Solutions Composition | Process Parameters | Effect | References | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| apple cylinders | apple juice with an addition of microorganisms | over 106 CFU/g | [ | ||
| pieces of guava and papaya | papaya and guava fruit juices (1—Extracted by blending with water, ratio 1:1; 2, 3—Extracted fruit juices containing 15° and 30° Brix, respectively) with an addition of | after impregnation: 108 to 109 CFU/g | [ | ||
| apple | isotonic sucrose solution containing 108 CFU/g | greater incorporation at pressures of 14 and 17 kPa, levels of microorganisms over 107 CFU/g | [ | ||
| apple cylinders cv. Granny Smith | sucrose isotonic solution containing microorganisms | increase by 0.36 log for | [ | ||
| apple slices (cv. Fuji) | apple juice diluted with pre-sterilized distilled water (1:1, | after vacuum impregnation: 109 CFU/gof tissue | [ | ||
| apples cv. Granny Smith (disk-shaped samples) | mandarin juice (pH 5, 8–6, 0) with an addition of | after vacuum impregnation: 1.51·108 CFU/g | [ | ||
| apples cv. Granny Smith (disk-shaped samples) | mandarin juice inoculated with | concentration of microorganisms in the final product: 107 CFU/g | [ | ||
| eggplant fruits and orange peel | isotonic solution of sucrose, iron gluconate and calcium lactate | a mathematical model to determine the concentration of active components in impregnation solution was established in order to formulate functional food with different calcium and iron salts levels | [ | ||
| iceberg lettuce leaves | sucrose aqueous solution of the same
| total content of 169 mg Ca per 250 g of impregnated iceberg lettuce leaves | [ | ||
| apple slices cv. Granny Smith | sucrose isotonic solutions with an addition of calcium lactate (44.2 g/L) or ferrous gluconate (1.13 g/L) | after vacuum impregnation: fruits enriched with Ca2+ and Fe2+ ions respectively | [ | ||
| apple slices cv. Granny Smith | isotonic aqueous solution containing sucrose ( | an increase in calcium content from 0% to 40% of the recommended daily intake for an adult per 200 g of apples | [ | ||
| fresh-cut apples cv. Fuji | 20% diluted high fructose corn syrup (HFCS) or 1% calcium caseinate (CC) aqueous solution with an addition of 0.4% α-tocopherol acetate, 7.5% Gluconal Cal® (GC), and 0.04% zinc lactate (ZL) | in 100 g fresh-cut apples the vitamin E content increased more than 100 times, and calcium and zinc contents increased about 20 times compared with unfortified apples | [ | ||
| fresh-cut pears cv. D’Anjou | 20% diluted wildflower honey solution with 0.4% to 0.8% α-tocopherol from 3 different sources: α-tocopherol-acetate (VE-acetate), free α-tocopherol (V-OH), or water-soluble α-tocopherol-acetate (VE-H2O) | vitamin E content of impregnated pears increased 80 to 100 times and 65% to 80% VE activities were retained during 2 week of storage | [ | ||
| whole potatoes | 10% ascorbic acid solution | after vacuum impregnation the ascorbic acid content of whole potatoes increased ten times (150 mg/100 g fresh weight) | [ | ||
| endive, cauliflower, broccoli, carrots | vacuum impregnation reference solution—aqueous sucrose solutions of the same
| after vacuum impregnation: incorporation of up to 7 g of Aloe vera in 100 g (dry matter) in broccoli, about 4 g in cauliflower and endive, and about 3 g in carrots | [ | ||
| apples cv. Granny Smith (disk-shaped samples) | mandarin low pulp juice | forty grams of the final product (apple snack) made using mandarin juice provide the same quantity of hesperidin as 250 mL of fresh mandarin juice | [ | ||
| 13 apple cultivars (6 mm apple slices) | commercial apple juice (11.1° ± 0.1° Brix) enriched with 0.3% hfv (high in flavonoids) apple peel extract | after vacuum impregnation of 13 apple cultivars: quercetin content ranged between 368 and 604 μg/g dry matter | [ | ||
| green apples cv. Orin (apple cubes) | sugar solution (total soluble solids of 50° Brix ) mixed with blackcurrant syrup (47.4°–47.8° Brix). Total soluble solids of the mixture of sugar syrup/blackcurrant syrup of 80%/20%, 70%/30% and 60%/40% were 49.1°, 49.3° and 49.5° Brix, respectively | optimized conditions for vacuum impregnation of apple cubes were 18%–20% blackcurrant concentrate level, 77–80 kPa vacuum pressure and 38–45 min vacuum time | [ | ||
| fresh-cut apple cv. Granny Smith (wedges, each | 50% ( | less acceptable in terms of sensory qualities than their fresh-cut counterparts, total polyphenol content and antioxidant activity values in vacuum impregnated products were lower than in fresh-cut samples | [ |
p1—vacuum pressure in the VI process; t1—time in reduced pressure; t2—time in atmospheric pressure.