Literature DB >> 25243736

The utility of clinical measures for the diagnosis of achilles tendon injuries: a systematic review with meta-analysis.

Michael Reiman1, Ciara Burgi, Eileen Strube, Kevin Prue, Keaton Ray, Amanda Elliott, Adam Goode.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To summarize and evaluate the current diagnostic accuracy of clinical measures used to diagnose Achilles tendon injuries. DATA SOURCES: A literature search of MEDLINE, CINAHL, and EMBASE databases was conducted with key words related to diagnostic accuracy and Achilles tendon injuries. STUDY SELECTION: Original research articles investigating Achilles tendon injuries against an acceptable reference standard were included. DATA EXTRACTION: Three studies met the inclusion criteria. Quality assessment was conducted using the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies-2 tool. DerSimonian-Laird random-effects models were used to pool sensitivity (SN), specificity (SP), and diagnostic odds ratios with their 95% confidence intervals (CIs). DATA SYNTHESIS: The SN and negative likelihood ratio (-LR) values for Achilles tendon rupture measures ranged from 0.73 (95% CI = 0.65, 0.81) and 0.30 (95% CI = 0.23, 0.40) to 0.96 (95% CI = 0.93, 0.99) and 0.04 (95% CI = 0.02, 0.10), respectively, whereas SP and positive likelihood ratio (+LR) values ranged from 0.85 (95% CI = 0.72, 0.98) and 6.29 (95% CI = 2.33, 19.96) to 0.93 (95% CI = 0.84, 1.00) and 13.71 (95% CI = 3.54, 51.24), respectively, with the highest SN and SP both reported in the calf-squeeze test. The SN and -LR values for Achilles tendinopathy measures ranged from 0.03 (95% CI = 0.00, 0.08) and 0.97 (95% CI = not reported) to 0.89 (95% CI = 0.75, 0.98) and 0.19 (95% CI = not reported), whereas SP and +LR values ranged from 0.58 (95% CI = 0.38, 0.77) and 2.12 (95% CI = not reported) to 1.00 (95% CI = 1.00, 1.00) and infinity, respectively, with the highest SN and SP reported for morning stiffness and palpation for crepitus. Pooled analyses demonstrated similar diagnostic properties in all 3 clinical measures (arc sign, palpation, and Royal London Hospital test), with SN and -LR ranging from 0.42 (95% CI = 0.23, 0.62) and 0.68 (95% CI = 0.50, 0.93), respectively, for the arc sign, to 0.64 (95% CI = 0.44, 0.81) and 0.48 (95% CI = 0.29, 0.80), respectively, for palpation. Pooled SP and +LR ranged from 0.81 (95% CI = 0.65, 0.91) and 3.15 (95% CI = 1.61, 6.18), respectively, for palpation, to 0.88 (95% CI = 0.74, 0.96) SP for the arc sign and 3.84 (95% CI = 1.69, 8.73) +LR for the Royal London Hospital test.
CONCLUSIONS: Most clinical measures for Achilles tendon injury have greater diagnostic than screening capability.

Entities:  

Keywords:  diagnostic accuracy; sensitivity; specificity

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25243736      PMCID: PMC4264655          DOI: 10.4085/1062-6050-49.3.36

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Athl Train        ISSN: 1062-6050            Impact factor:   2.860


  46 in total

1.  Publication and related bias in meta-analysis: power of statistical tests and prevalence in the literature.

Authors:  J A Sterne; D Gavaghan; M Egger
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 6.437

2.  The diagnostic odds ratio: a single indicator of test performance.

Authors:  Afina S Glas; Jeroen G Lijmer; Martin H Prins; Gouke J Bonsel; Patrick M M Bossuyt
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 6.437

3.  Users' guides to the medical literature. III. How to use an article about a diagnostic test. B. What are the results and will they help me in caring for my patients? The Evidence-Based Medicine Working Group.

Authors:  R Jaeschke; G H Guyatt; D L Sackett
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1994-03-02       Impact factor: 56.272

4.  An application of hierarchical kappa-type statistics in the assessment of majority agreement among multiple observers.

Authors:  J R Landis; G G Koch
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1977-06       Impact factor: 2.571

5.  Meta-analysis in clinical trials.

Authors:  R DerSimonian; N Laird
Journal:  Control Clin Trials       Date:  1986-09

Review 6.  Neglected rupture of the Achilles tendon.

Authors:  S Gabel; A Manoli
Journal:  Foot Ankle Int       Date:  1994-09       Impact factor: 2.827

Review 7.  Achilles tendon injuries in athletes.

Authors:  M Kvist
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  1994-09       Impact factor: 11.136

8.  The role of recreational sport activity in Achilles tendon rupture. A clinical, pathoanatomical, and sociological study of 292 cases.

Authors:  L Józsa; M Kvist; B J Bálint; A Reffy; M Järvinen; M Lehto; M Barzo
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  1989 May-Jun       Impact factor: 6.202

9.  Clinical diagnosis of Achilles tendinopathy with tendinosis.

Authors:  Nicola Maffulli; Michael G Kenward; Vittorino Testa; Giovanni Capasso; Renato Regine; John B King
Journal:  Clin J Sport Med       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 3.638

10.  Diagnostic value of ultrasonography in partial ruptures of the Achilles tendon.

Authors:  P Kälebo; C Allenmark; L Peterson; L Swärd
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  1992 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 6.202

View more
  10 in total

Review 1.  Tendinopathy.

Authors:  Neal L Millar; Karin G Silbernagel; Kristian Thorborg; Paul D Kirwan; Leesa M Galatz; Geoffrey D Abrams; George A C Murrell; Iain B McInnes; Scott A Rodeo
Journal:  Nat Rev Dis Primers       Date:  2021-01-07       Impact factor: 52.329

2.  Differences at the Achilles Insertion Between Adults with Insertional and Midportion Achilles Tendinopathy as Observed Using Ultrasound.

Authors:  Nabeel Hamdan Alghamdi; Ryan T Pohlig; Jaclyn Megan Sions; Karin Grävare Silbernagel
Journal:  Muscles Ligaments Tendons J       Date:  2022 Apr-Jun

Review 3.  Non-insertional Achilles tendinopathy.

Authors:  Christopher J Pearce; Audrey Tan
Journal:  EFORT Open Rev       Date:  2017-03-13

4.  Objective assessment of stiffness in Achilles tendinopathy: a novel approach using the MyotonPRO.

Authors:  Gafin Ericson Morgan; Rhodri Martin; Lisa Williams; Owen Pearce; Keith Morris
Journal:  BMJ Open Sport Exerc Med       Date:  2018-12-05

Review 5.  Injection Techniques for Common Chronic Pain Conditions of the Foot: A Comprehensive Review.

Authors:  Ivan Urits; Daniel Smoots; Henry Franscioni; Anjana Patel; Nathan Fackler; Seth Wiley; Amnon A Berger; Hisham Kassem; Richard D Urman; Laxmaiah Manchikanti; Alaa Abd-Elsayed; Alan D Kaye; Omar Viswanath
Journal:  Pain Ther       Date:  2020-02-27

6.  No Difference in Clinical Effects When Comparing Alfredson Eccentric and Silbernagel Combined Concentric-Eccentric Loading in Achilles Tendinopathy: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Authors:  Bas Habets; Robert E H van Cingel; Frank J G Backx; Hilco J van Elten; Peter Zuithoff; Bionka M A Huisstede
Journal:  Orthop J Sports Med       Date:  2021-10-27

7.  The clinical diagnosis of Achilles tendinopathy: a scoping review.

Authors:  Wesley Matthews; Richard Ellis; James Furness; Wayne A Hing
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2021-09-28       Impact factor: 2.984

8.  Disappointment and frustration, but long-term satisfaction: patient experiences undergoing treatment for a chronic Achilles tendon rupture-a qualitative study.

Authors:  Anna Nordenholm; Niklas Nilsson; Ferid Krupic; Eric Hamrin Senorski; Katarina Nilsson Helander; Olof Westin; Jón Karlsson
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2022-04-09       Impact factor: 2.359

9.  Minimally invasive, endoscopic Achilles tendon reconstruction using semitendinosus and gracilis tendons with Endobutton stabilization.

Authors:  Tomasz Piontek; Paweł Bąkowski; Kinga Ciemniewska-Gorzela; Monika Grygorowicz
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2016-06-03       Impact factor: 2.362

10.  Surgical treatment of chronic Achilles tendon rupture results in improved gait biomechanics.

Authors:  Anna Nordenholm; Eric Hamrin Senorski; Olof Westin; Katarina Nilsson Helander; Michael Möller; Jón Karlsson; Roland Zügner
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2022-02-02       Impact factor: 2.359

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.