Literature DB >> 25243571

Body composition during childhood and adolescence: relations to bone strength and microstructure.

Joshua N Farr1, Shreyasee Amin, Nathan K LeBrasseur, Elizabeth J Atkinson, Sara J Achenbach, Louise K McCready, L Joseph Melton, Sundeep Khosla.   

Abstract

CONTEXT: Numerous studies have examined the association of body composition with bone development in children and adolescents, but none have used micro-finite element (μFE) analysis of high-resolution peripheral quantitative computed tomography images to assess bone strength.
OBJECTIVE: This study sought to examine the relations of appendicular lean mass (ALM) and total body fat mass (TBFM) to bone strength (failure load) at the distal radius and tibia. DESIGN, PARTICIPANTS, AND
SETTING: This was a cross-sectional study of 198 healthy 8- to <15-year-old boys (n = 109) and girls (n = 89) performed in a Clinical Research Unit.
RESULTS: After adjusting for bone age, height, fracture history, ALM, and TBFM, multiple linear regression analyses in boys and girls, separately, showed robust positive associations between ALM and failure loads at both the distal radius (boys: β = 0.92, P < .001; girls: β = 0.66, P = .001) and tibia (boys: β = 0.96, P < .001; girls: β = 0.66, P < .001). By contrast, in both boys and girls the relationship between TBFM and failure load at the distal radius was virtually nonexistent (boys: β = -0.07; P = .284; girls: β = -0.03; P = .729). At the distal tibia, positive, albeit weak, associations were observed between TBFM and failure load in both boys (β = 0.09, P = .075) and girls (β = 0.17, P = .033).
CONCLUSIONS: Our data highlight the importance of lean mass for optimizing bone strength during growth, and suggest that fat mass may have differential relations to bone strength at weight-bearing vs non-weight-bearing sites in children and adolescents. These observations suggest that the strength of the distal radius does not commensurately increase with excess gains in adiposity during growth, which may result in a mismatch between bone strength and the load experienced by the distal forearm during a fall. These findings may explain, in part, why obese children are over-represented among distal forearm fracture cases.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25243571      PMCID: PMC4255129          DOI: 10.1210/jc.2014-1113

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Endocrinol Metab        ISSN: 0021-972X            Impact factor:   5.958


  38 in total

1.  Estimation of distal radius failure load with micro-finite element analysis models based on three-dimensional peripheral quantitative computed tomography images.

Authors:  W Pistoia; B van Rietbergen; E-M Lochmüller; C A Lill; F Eckstein; P Rüegsegger
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 4.398

2.  Proximal femur bone geometry is appropriately adapted to lean mass in overweight children and adolescents.

Authors:  Moira A Petit; Thomas J Beck; Justine Shults; Babette S Zemel; Bethany J Foster; Mary B Leonard
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 4.398

3.  Is adiposity advantageous for bone strength? A peripheral quantitative computed tomography study in late adolescent females.

Authors:  Norman K Pollock; Emma M Laing; Clifton A Baile; Mark W Hamrick; Daniel B Hall; Richard D Lewis
Journal:  Am J Clin Nutr       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 7.045

4.  Muscle determinants of bone mass, geometry and strength in prepubertal girls.

Authors:  Robin M Daly; Susanna Stenevi-Lundgren; Christian Linden; Magnus K Karlsson
Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 5.411

5.  Accuracy of cortical and trabecular bone measurements with peripheral quantitative computed tomography (pQCT).

Authors:  P Augat; C L Gordon; T F Lang; H Iida; H K Genant
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  1998-10       Impact factor: 3.609

6.  Bone and body composition of children and adolescents with repeated forearm fractures.

Authors:  Ailsa Goulding; Andrea M Grant; Sheila M Williams
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2005-08-22       Impact factor: 6.741

7.  Effects of sex and age on bone microstructure at the ultradistal radius: a population-based noninvasive in vivo assessment.

Authors:  Sundeep Khosla; B Lawrence Riggs; Elizabeth J Atkinson; Ann L Oberg; Lisa J McDaniel; Margaret Holets; James M Peterson; L Joseph Melton
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2005-10-03       Impact factor: 6.741

8.  Bone mineral density in girls with forearm fractures.

Authors:  A Goulding; R Cannan; S M Williams; E J Gold; R W Taylor; N J Lewis-Barned
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  1998-01       Impact factor: 6.741

9.  Bone structure and volumetric BMD in overweight children: a longitudinal study.

Authors:  Rachel J Wetzsteon; Moira A Petit; Heather M Macdonald; Julie M Hughes; Thomas J Beck; Heather A McKay
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 6.741

10.  Tracking of bone mass from childhood to adolescence and factors that predict deviation from tracking.

Authors:  Stella Foley; Stephen Quinn; Graeme Jones
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2008-11-27       Impact factor: 4.398

View more
  19 in total

1.  Obese Versus Normal-Weight Late-Adolescent Females have Inferior Trabecular Bone Microarchitecture: A Pilot Case-Control Study.

Authors:  Joseph M Kindler; Norman K Pollock; Hannah L Ross; Christopher M Modlesky; Harshvardhan Singh; Emma M Laing; Richard D Lewis
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  2017-07-14       Impact factor: 4.333

2.  Trabecular Bone Morphology Correlates With Skeletal Maturity and Body Composition in Healthy Adolescent Girls.

Authors:  Deborah M Mitchell; Signe Caksa; Amy Yuan; Mary L Bouxsein; Madhusmita Misra; Sherri-Ann M Burnett-Bowie
Journal:  J Clin Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2018-01-01       Impact factor: 5.958

3.  Soft tissues, areal bone mineral density and hip geometry estimates in active young boys: the PRO-BONE study.

Authors:  Kelly Wilkinson; Dimitris Vlachopoulos; Panagiota Klentrou; Esther Ubago-Guisado; Augusto César Ferreira De Moraes; Alan R Barker; Craig A Williams; Luis A Moreno; Luis Gracia-Marco
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2017-03-07       Impact factor: 3.078

4.  Precision of bone density and micro-architectural properties at the distal radius and tibia in children: an HR-pQCT study.

Authors:  C E Kawalilak; A T Bunyamin; K M Björkman; J D Johnston; S A Kontulainen
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2017-09-18       Impact factor: 4.507

5.  Relative contributions of lean and fat mass to bone strength in young Hispanic and non-Hispanic girls.

Authors:  Megan Hetherington-Rauth; Jennifer W Bea; Robert M Blew; Janet L Funk; Melanie D Hingle; Vinson R Lee; Denise J Roe; Mark D Wheeler; Timothy G Lohman; Scott B Going
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2018-05-22       Impact factor: 4.398

Review 6.  The Impact of Fat and Obesity on Bone Microarchitecture and Strength in Children.

Authors:  Joshua N Farr; Paul Dimitri
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  2016-12-24       Impact factor: 4.333

7.  Skeletal Effects of Nine Months of Physical Activity in Obese and Healthy Weight Children.

Authors:  Vineel Kondiboyina; Lauren B Raine; Arthur F Kramer; Naiman A Khan; Charles H Hillman; Sandra J Shefelbine
Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc       Date:  2020-02

8.  The Role of Overweight and Obesity on Bone Health in Korean Adolescents with a Focus on Lean and Fat Mass.

Authors:  Hwa Young Kim; Hae Woon Jung; Hyunsook Hong; Jae Hyun Kim; Choong Ho Shin; Sei Won Yang; Young Ah Lee
Journal:  J Korean Med Sci       Date:  2017-10       Impact factor: 2.153

9.  A Perspective on Management of Limb Fractures in Obese Children: Is It Time for Dedicated Guidelines?

Authors:  Fabrizio Donati; Pier Francesco Costici; Sergio De Salvatore; Aaron Burrofato; Enrico Micciulli; Aniello Maiese; Paola Santoro; Raffaele La Russa
Journal:  Front Pediatr       Date:  2020-05-08       Impact factor: 3.418

Review 10.  Factors influencing peak bone mass gain.

Authors:  Xiaowei Zhu; Houfeng Zheng
Journal:  Front Med       Date:  2020-06-09       Impact factor: 4.592

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.