Literature DB >> 25243070

The Yin: An adverse health perspective of nanoceria: uptake, distribution, accumulation, and mechanisms of its toxicity.

Robert A Yokel1, Salik Hussain2, Stavros Garantziotis2, Philip Demokritou3, Vincent Castranova4, Flemming R Cassee5.   

Abstract

This critical review evolved from a SNO Special Workshop on Nanoceria panel presentation addressing the toxicological risks of nanoceria: accumulation, target organs, and issues of clearance; how exposure dose/concentration, exposure route, and experimental preparation/model influence the different reported effects of nanoceria; and how can safer by design concepts be applied to nanoceria? It focuses on the most relevant routes of human nanoceria exposure and uptake, disposition, persistence, and resultant adverse effects. The pulmonary, oral, dermal, and topical ocular exposure routes are addressed as well as the intravenous route, as the latter provides a reference for the pharmacokinetic fate of nanoceria once introduced into blood. Nanoceria reaching the blood is primarily distributed to mononuclear phagocytic system organs. Available data suggest nanoceria's distribution is not greatly affected by dose, shape, or dosing schedule. Significant attention has been paid to the inhalation exposure route. Nanoceria distribution from the lung to the rest of the body is less than 1% of the deposited dose, and from the gastrointestinal tract even less. Intracellular nanoceria and organ burdens persist for at least months, suggesting very slow clearance rates. The acute toxicity of nanoceria is very low. However, large/accumulated doses produce granuloma in the lung and liver, and fibrosis in the lung. Toxicity, including genotoxicity, increases with exposure time; the effects disappear slowly, possibly due to nanoceria's biopersistence. Nanoceria may exert toxicity through oxidative stress. Adverse effects seen at sites distal to exposure may be due to nanoceria translocation or released biomolecules. An example is elevated oxidative stress indicators in the brain, in the absence of appreciable brain nanoceria. Nanoceria may change its nature in biological environments and cause changes in biological molecules. Increased toxicity has been related to greater surface Ce3+, which becomes more relevant as particle size decreases and the ratio of surface area to volume increases. Given its biopersistence and resulting increased toxicity with time, there is a risk that long-term exposure to low nanoceria levels may eventually lead to adverse health effects. This critical review provides recommendations for research to resolve some of the many unknowns of nanoceria's fate and adverse effects.

Entities:  

Year:  2014        PMID: 25243070      PMCID: PMC4167411          DOI: 10.1039/C4EN00039K

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Sci Nano


  102 in total

1.  Physicochemical and morphological characterisation of nanoparticles from photocopiers: implications for environmental health.

Authors:  Dhimiter Bello; John Martin; Christopher Santeufemio; Qingwei Sun; Kristin Lee Bunker; Martin Shafer; Philip Demokritou
Journal:  Nanotoxicology       Date:  2012-06-14       Impact factor: 5.913

2.  Transmucosal penetration of bismuth particles in the human stomach.

Authors:  C U Nwokolo; J F Lewin; M Hudson; R E Pounder
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  1992-01       Impact factor: 22.682

3.  Alteration of hepatic structure and oxidative stress induced by intravenous nanoceria.

Authors:  Michael T Tseng; Xiaoqin Lu; Xiaoxian Duan; Sarita S Hardas; Rukhsana Sultana; Peng Wu; Jason M Unrine; Uschi Graham; D Allan Butterfield; Eric A Grulke; Robert A Yokel
Journal:  Toxicol Appl Pharmacol       Date:  2012-02-20       Impact factor: 4.219

4.  Redox reactivity of cerium oxide nanoparticles against dopamine.

Authors:  Akhtar Hayat; Daniel Andreescu; Gonca Bulbul; Silvana Andreescu
Journal:  J Colloid Interface Sci       Date:  2013-12-11       Impact factor: 8.128

5.  Ce³+ ions determine redox-dependent anti-apoptotic effect of cerium oxide nanoparticles.

Authors:  Ivana Celardo; Milena De Nicola; Corrado Mandoli; Jens Z Pedersen; Enrico Traversa; Lina Ghibelli
Journal:  ACS Nano       Date:  2011-06-02       Impact factor: 15.881

6.  In Vivo Processing of Ceria Nanoparticles inside Liver: Impact on Free-Radical Scavenging Activity and Oxidative Stress.

Authors:  Uschi M Graham; Michael T Tseng; Jacek B Jasinski; Robert A Yokel; Jason M Unrine; Burtron H Davis; Alan K Dozier; Sarita S Hardas; Rukhsana Sultana; Eric A Grulke; D Allan Butterfield
Journal:  Chempluschem       Date:  2014-08       Impact factor: 2.863

7.  Interplay between apoptotic and autophagy pathways after exposure to cerium dioxide nanoparticles in human monocytes.

Authors:  Salik Hussain; Stavros Garantziotis
Journal:  Autophagy       Date:  2012-10-09       Impact factor: 16.016

8.  Anti-inflammatory properties of cerium oxide nanoparticles.

Authors:  Suzanne M Hirst; Ajay S Karakoti; Ron D Tyler; Nammalwar Sriranganathan; Sudipta Seal; Christopher M Reilly
Journal:  Small       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 13.281

9.  The induction of angiogenesis by cerium oxide nanoparticles through the modulation of oxygen in intracellular environments.

Authors:  Soumen Das; Sanjay Singh; Janet M Dowding; Saji Oommen; Amit Kumar; Thi X T Sayle; Shashank Saraf; Chitta R Patra; Nicholas E Vlahakis; Dean C Sayle; William T Self; Sudipta Seal
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2012-08-01       Impact factor: 12.479

Review 10.  Nanotoxicology: an emerging discipline evolving from studies of ultrafine particles.

Authors:  Günter Oberdörster; Eva Oberdörster; Jan Oberdörster
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 9.031

View more
  37 in total

Review 1.  Nanoparticle exposures from nano-enabled toner-based printing equipment and human health: state of science and future research needs.

Authors:  Sandra Vanessa Pirela; John Martin; Dhimiter Bello; Philip Demokritou
Journal:  Crit Rev Toxicol       Date:  2017-05-19       Impact factor: 5.635

2.  Toxicological effects of ingested nanocellulose in in vitro intestinal epithelium and in vivo rat models.

Authors:  Glen M DeLoid; Xiaoqiong Cao; Ramon M Molina; Daniel Imbassahy Silva; Kunal Bhattacharya; Kee Woei Ng; Say Chye Joachim Loo; Joseph D Brain; Philip Demokritou
Journal:  Environ Sci Nano       Date:  2019-06-18

3.  Decreased Uptake and Enhanced Mitochondrial Protection Underlie Reduced Toxicity of Nanoceria in Human Monocyte-Derived Macrophages.

Authors:  Salik Hussain; Pretti P Kodavanti; Jamie D Marshburg; Agnes Janoshazi; Stella M Marinakos; Margaret George; Annette Rice; Mark R Wiesner; Stavros Garantziotis
Journal:  J Biomed Nanotechnol       Date:  2016-12       Impact factor: 4.099

Review 4.  Redox-active nanomaterials for nanomedicine applications.

Authors:  Christopher M Sims; Shannon K Hanna; Daniel A Heller; Christopher P Horoszko; Monique E Johnson; Antonio R Montoro Bustos; Vytas Reipa; Kathryn R Riley; Bryant C Nelson
Journal:  Nanoscale       Date:  2017-10-19       Impact factor: 7.790

5.  No genome-wide DNA methylation changes found associated with medium-term reduced graphene oxide exposure in human lung epithelial cells.

Authors:  Raúl F Pérez; Anna Yunuen Soto Fernández; Pablo Bousquets Muñoz; Marta I Sierra; Juan Ramón Tejedor; Paula Morales-Sánchez; Adolfo F Valdés; Ricardo Santamaría; Clara Blanco; Ramón Torrecillas; Mario F Fraga; Agustín F Fernández
Journal:  Epigenetics       Date:  2019-09-18       Impact factor: 4.528

6.  Evaluation of tumorigenic potential of CeO2 and Fe2O3 engineered nanoparticles by a human cell in vitro screening model.

Authors:  Todd A Stueckle; Donna C Davidson; Raymond Derk; Tiffany G Kornberg; Diane Schwegler-Berry; Sandra V Pirela; Glen Deloid; Philip Demokritou; Sudjit Luanpitpong; Yon Rojanasakul; Liying Wang
Journal:  NanoImpact       Date:  2016-11-22

7.  The Role of the Food Matrix and Gastrointestinal Tract in the assessment of biological properties of ingested engineered nanomaterials (iENMs): State of the science and knowledge gaps.

Authors:  David Julian McClements; Glen DeLoid; Georgios Pyrgiotakis; Jo Anne Shatkin; Hang Xiao; Philip Demokritou
Journal:  NanoImpact       Date:  2016-10-13

8.  Effects of engineered nanomaterial exposure on macrophage innate immune function.

Authors:  Glen DeLoid; Beatriz Casella; Sandra Pirela; Rose Filoramo; Georgios Pyrgiotakis; Philip Demokritou; Lester Kobzik
Journal:  NanoImpact       Date:  2016-07-25

9.  Dermal transfer and environmental release of CeO2 nanoparticles used as UV inhibitors on outdoor surfaces: Implications for human and environmental health.

Authors:  Justin G Clar; William E Platten; Eric J Baumann; Andrew Remsen; Steve M Harmon; Christina L Bennett-Stamper; Treye A Thomas; Todd P Luxton
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2017-09-20       Impact factor: 7.963

10.  Effects of ingested nanocellulose on intestinal microbiota and homeostasis in Wistar Han rats.

Authors:  Sangeeta Khare; Glen M DeLoid; Ramon M Molina; Kuppan Gokulan; Sneha P Couvillion; Kent J Bloodsworth; Elizabeth K Eder; Allison R Wong; David W Hoyt; Lisa M Bramer; Thomas O Metz; Brian D Thrall; Joseph D Brain; Philip Demokritou
Journal:  NanoImpact       Date:  2020-02-28
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.