| Literature DB >> 25242919 |
Rodrigo Fernandes Castanha1, Adriano Pinto Mariano2, Lilia Aparecida Salgado de Morais1, Shirlei Scramin1, Regina Teresa Rosim Monteiro3.
Abstract
This study aimed the optimization of culture condition and composition for production of Cryptococcus laurentii 11 biomass and lipids in cheese whey medium supplemented with sugarcane molasses. The optimization of pH, fermentation time, and molasses concentration according to a full factorial statistical experimental design was followed by a Plackett-Burman experimental design, which was used to determine whether the supplementation of the culture medium by yeast extract and inorganic salts could provide a further enhancement of lipids production. The following conditions and composition of the culture medium were found to optimize biomass and lipids production: 360 h fermentation, 6.5 pH and supplementation of (g L(-1)): 50 molasses, 0.5 yeast extract, 4 KH2PO4, 1 Na2HPO4, 0.75 MgSO4 · 7H2O and 0.002 ZnSO4 · H2O. Additional supplementation with inorganic salts and yeast extract was essential to optimize the production, in terms of product concentration and productivity, of neutral lipids by C. laurentii 11. Under this optimized condition, the production of total lipids increased by 133% in relation to control experiment (from 1.27 to 2.96 g L(-1)). The total lipids indicated a predominant (86%) presence of neutral lipids with high content of 16- and 18-carbon-chain saturated and monosaturated fatty acids. This class of lipids is considered especially suitable for the production of biodiesel.Entities:
Keywords: Cryptococcus laurentii; biodiesel; cheese whey; microbial lipids; sugarcane molasses
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2014 PMID: 25242919 PMCID: PMC4166260 DOI: 10.1590/s1517-83822014000200003
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Braz J Microbiol ISSN: 1517-8382 Impact factor: 2.476
Coded level and real values of the full factorial experimental design with the results (responses) for dry biomass and total lipids.
| Run | Coded level (real value) | Response | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
| ||||
| pH | Fermentation time (h) | Molasses (g L−1) | Dry biomass (g L−1) | Total lipids (g L−1) | |
| 1 | +1(6.5) | +1(360) | +1(100) | 13.23±0.64 | 1.25 0.18 |
| 2 | −1(5.0) | +1(360) | +1(100) | 12.54±0.23 | 1.16±0.06 |
| 3 | +1(6.5) | −1(120) | +1(100) | 7.22±0.30 | 0.75±0.03 |
| 4 | −1(5.0) | −1(120) | +1(100) | 6.73±0.73 | 0.70±0.04 |
| 5 | +1(6.5) | +1(360) | −1(50) | 16.58±1.47 | 1.53±0.12 |
| 6 | −1(5.0) | +1(360) | −1(50) | 14.75±2.23 | 1.05±0.08 |
| 7 | +1(6.5) | −1(120) | −1(50) | 8.64±0.77 | 0.55±0.13 |
| 8 | −1(5.0) | −1(120) | −1(50) | 6.69±0.34 | 0.52±0.04 |
| 9 | 0(5.75) | 0(240) | 0(75) | 10.66±0.33 | 0.79±0.013 |
| CM | - | - | - | 4.57±0.80 | 1.27±0.28 |
mean values from triplicate experiments±standard deviation.
57% of total reducing sugars.
Control medium composed of cheese whey without molasses supplementation and pH adjustment. Cultivation was conducted at 28 °C and 180 rpm for 240 h.
Factors and experimental levels of the Plackett-Burman experimental design.
| Factor (g L−1) | Experimental level | ||
|---|---|---|---|
|
| |||
| −1 | 0 | +1 | |
| Yeast extract | 0.5 | 1 | 1.5 |
| KH2PO4 | 4 | 7 | 10 |
| Na2HPO4 | 1 | 2 | 3 |
| MgSO4·7H2O | 0.75 | 1.5 | 2.25 |
| CaCl2·2H2O | 0 | 0.1 | 0.2 |
| FeCl3·6H2O | 0 | 0.01 | 0.02 |
| ZnSO4·H2O | 0 | 0.001 | 0.002 |
Plackett-Burman design matrix with coded values for the variables and the results (responses) for dry biomass and total lipids (g L−1).
| Run | Factor | Response | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
| ||||||||
| A | B | C | D | E | F | G | Dry biomass (g L−1) | Total lipids (g L−1) | |
| 1 | +1 | −1 | +1 | −1 | −1 | −1 | +1 | 19.67 | 2.31 |
| 2 | +1 | +1 | −1 | +1 | −1 | −1 | −1 | 20.15 | 2.25 |
| 3 | −1 | +1 | +1 | −1 | +1 | −1 | −1 | 19.23 | 2.16 |
| 4 | +1 | −1 | +1 | +1 | −1 | +1 | −1 | 19.20 | 2.40 |
| 5 | +1 | +1 | −1 | +1 | +1 | −1 | +1 | 18.92 | 2.96 |
| 6 | +1 | +1 | +1 | −1 | +1 | +1 | −1 | 19.71 | 2.39 |
| 7 | −1 | +1 | +1 | +1 | −1 | +1 | +1 | 19.59 | 2.39 |
| 8 | −1 | −1 | +1 | +1 | +1 | −1 | +1 | 20.14 | 2.65 |
| 9 | −1 | −1 | −1 | +1 | +1 | +1 | −1 | 20.23 | 2.35 |
| 10 | +1 | −1 | −1 | −1 | +1 | +1 | +1 | 19.02 | 2.52 |
| 11 | −1 | +1 | −1 | −1 | −1 | +1 | +1 | 18.39 | 2.70 |
| 12 | −1 | −1 | −1 | −1 | −1 | −1 | −1 | 18.63 | 2.17 |
| 13 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 18.81 | 2.37 |
| 14 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 18.64 | 2.36 |
| 15 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 18.48 | 2.38 |
| 16 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 18.54 | 2.30 |
| 17 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 18.24 | 2.62 |
(A) yeast extract, (B) KH2PO4, (C) Na2HPO4, (D) MgSO4·7H2O, (E) CaCl2·2H2O, (F) FeCl3·6H2O, (G) ZnSO4·H2O.
Figure 1Pareto chart of the effects of pH, fermentation time, and molasses concentration on (a) biomass production and (b) total lipids production by C. laurentti 11. 1by2 means interaction between pH and fermentation time; 1by3 means interaction between pH and molasses concentration; 2by3 means interaction between fermentation time and molasses concentration.
Figure 2Response surfaces (a) Dry biomass as a function of molasses concentration and fermentation time (R2 = 0.95); pH at 5.75. (b) Dry biomass as a function of molasses concentration and pH (R2 = 0.95); fermentation time at 360 h. (c) Total lipids as a function of pH and fermentation time (R2 = 0.90); molasses concentration at 75 g L−1. (d) Total lipids as a function of molasses concentration and fermentation time (R2 = 0.90); pH at 6.5.
Figure 3Pareto chart of the effects of inorganic salts and yeast extract on (a) biomass production and (b) total lipids production by C. laurentti 11.
Summary of the main indicators of fermentation performance.
| Fermentation | Dry biomass (g L−1) | Total lipids (g L−1) | Lipids productivity (g L−1 h−1 10−3) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Control (240 h fermentation time, without both pH adjustment and molasses supplementation) | 4.57 | 1.27 | 5.29 |
| Optimized condition 1 (360 h fermentation time, pH 6.5, 50 g molasses/L) | 16.58 | 1.53 | 4.25 |
| Optimized condition 2 (360 h fermentation time, pH 6.5, 50 g molasses/L plus supplementation with inorganic salts and yeast extract) | 18.92 | 2.96 | 8.22 |
Fatty acid distribution (total lipids, neutral lipids - N, glycolipids plus sphingolipids - G + S, phospholipids - P).
| Fatty acids | Distribution (%) | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| ||||||||||||
| Total lipids | N | G + S | P | |||||||||
| (1) | (2) | (3) | (1) | (2) | (3) | (1) | (2) | (3) | (1) | (2) | (3) | |
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||
| C16:0 | 21.0 | 27.4 | 24.7 | 23.0 | 26.3 | 24.4 | 24.9 | 30.8 | 25.2 | 24.6 | 33.8 | 37.8 |
| C18:0 | 28.8 | 20.4 | 32.0 | 26.4 | 25.5 | 31.1 | 22.3 | 17.4 | 29.9 | 10.5 | 15.7 | 25.2 |
| C18:1 | 36.0 | 40.6 | 32.7 | 36.4 | 33.7 | 33.0 | 41.5 | 31.8 | 31.6 | 61.0 | 34.4 | 24.9 |
| C18:2 | 5.0 | 6.3 | 5.3 | 5.9 | 5.9 | 5.9 | 7.4 | 6.4 | 6.7 | 3.9 | 16.1 | 10.4 |
| Others | 8.4 | 5.3 | 2.7 | 7.5 | 8.6 | 2.8 | 3.9 | 13.5 | 6.5 | < 0.01 | < 0.01 | 1.7 |
| n.d. | 0.82 | 2.5 | < 0.01 | 0.77 | 1.4 | < 0.01 | < 0.01 | 9.6 | < 0.01 | < 0.01 | < 0.01 | < 0.01 |
| saturated | 58.2 | 57.5 | 59.4 | 56.9 | 51.1 | 58.4 | 51.1 | 51.7 | 61.6 | 35.1 | 49.5 | 63.0 |
| mono-unsaturated | 36.0 | 33.9 | 32.7 | 36.4 | 41.0 | 33.0 | 41.5 | 31.8 | 31.6 | 61.0 | 34.4 | 26.6 |
| poly-unsaturated | 5.0 | 6.1 | 5.3 | 5.9 | 6.5 | 5.9 | 7.4 | 6.9 | 6.7 | 3.9 | 16.1 | 10.4 |
| omega-3 | < 0.01 | 0.19 | < 0.01 | < 0.01 | 0.18 | < 0.01 | < 0.01 | 0.47 | < 0.01 | < 0.01 | < 0.01 | < 0.01 |
| omega-6 | 5.0 | 5.9 | 5.3 | 6.0 | 6.3 | 5.9 | 7.4 | 6.4 | 6.7 | 3.9 | 16.1 | 10.4 |
| total trans isomers | < 0.01 | 0.08 | < 0.01 | < 0.01 | 0.24 | < 0.01 | < 0.01 | < 0.01 | < 0.01 | < 0.01 | < 0.01 | < 0.01 |
| Fractions distribution | 100 | 100 | 100 | 89.1 | 72.3 | 85.8 | 6.9 | 19.4 | 9.1 | 4.0 | 8.3 | 5.1 |
Control.
Optimized condition 1 (molasses supplementation only).
Optimized condition 2 (molasses supplementation with inorganic salts and yeast extract).
C14:0, C15:0, C16:1, C17:0, C17:1, C18:1 trans, C18:3, C:20, C22:0, C23:0, C24:0.
not determined.