Literature DB >> 25240420

Attentional priority determines working memory precision.

Zuzanna Klyszejko1, Masih Rahmati1, Clayton E Curtis2.   

Abstract

Visual working memory is a system used to hold information actively in mind for a limited time. The number of items and the precision with which we can store information has limits that define its capacity. How much control do we have over the precision with which we store information when faced with these severe capacity limitations? Here, we tested the hypothesis that rank-ordered attentional priority determines the precision of multiple working memory representations. We conducted two psychophysical experiments that manipulated the priority of multiple items in a two-alternative forced choice task (2AFC) with distance discrimination. In Experiment 1, we varied the probabilities with which memorized items were likely to be tested. To generalize the effects of priority beyond simple cueing, in Experiment 2, we manipulated priority by varying monetary incentives contingent upon successful memory for items tested. Moreover, we illustrate our hypothesis using a simple model that distributed attentional resources across items with rank-ordered priorities. Indeed, we found evidence in both experiments that priority affects the precision of working memory in a monotonic fashion. Our results demonstrate that representations of priority may provide a mechanism by which resources can be allocated to increase the precision with which we encode and briefly store information.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Attention; Capacity; Psychophysics; Visual working memory

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25240420      PMCID: PMC4250278          DOI: 10.1016/j.visres.2014.09.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vision Res        ISSN: 0042-6989            Impact factor:   1.886


  28 in total

1.  Organization of visual short-term memory.

Authors:  Y Jiang; I R Olson; M M Chun
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 3.051

Review 2.  Seeing, sensing, and scrutinizing.

Authors:  R A Rensink
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 1.886

3.  The psychometric function: I. Fitting, sampling, and goodness of fit.

Authors:  F A Wichmann; N J Hill
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  2001-11

Review 4.  The frontoparietal attention network of the human brain: action, saliency, and a priority map of the environment.

Authors:  Radek Ptak
Journal:  Neuroscientist       Date:  2011-06-02       Impact factor: 7.519

5.  The number and quality of representations in working memory.

Authors:  Weiwei Zhang; Steven J Luck
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2011-10-10

Review 6.  Changing concepts of working memory.

Authors:  Wei Ji Ma; Masud Husain; Paul M Bays
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2014-02-25       Impact factor: 24.884

Review 7.  Computational modelling of visual attention.

Authors:  L Itti; C Koch
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 34.870

Review 8.  Attention, intention, and priority in the parietal lobe.

Authors:  James W Bisley; Michael E Goldberg
Journal:  Annu Rev Neurosci       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 12.449

9.  Noise in neural populations accounts for errors in working memory.

Authors:  Paul M Bays
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2014-03-05       Impact factor: 6.167

10.  The role of attentional priority and saliency in determining capacity limits in enumeration and visual working memory.

Authors:  David Melcher; Manuela Piazza
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-12-16       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  14 in total

1.  Dissociable signatures of visual salience and behavioral relevance across attentional priority maps in human cortex.

Authors:  Thomas C Sprague; Sirawaj Itthipuripat; Vy A Vo; John T Serences
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2018-02-28       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  Working memory prioritization impacts neural recovery from distraction.

Authors:  Remington Mallett; Jarrod A Lewis-Peacock
Journal:  Cortex       Date:  2019-09-20       Impact factor: 4.027

3.  Why Does the Neocortex Need the Cerebellum for Working Memory?

Authors:  Heike Stein
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2021-07-28       Impact factor: 6.167

4.  Behavioral Prioritization Enhances Working Memory Precision and Neural Population Gain.

Authors:  Aspen H Yoo; Alfredo Bolaños; Grace E Hallenbeck; Masih Rahmati; Thomas C Sprague; Clayton E Curtis
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2022-01-05       Impact factor: 3.420

5.  Working memory accuracy for multiple targets is driven by reward expectation and stimulus contrast with different time-courses.

Authors:  P Christiaan Klink; Danique Jeurissen; Jan Theeuwes; Damiaan Denys; Pieter R Roelfsema
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-08-22       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  The Graded Fate of Unattended Stimulus Representations in Visuospatial Working Memory.

Authors:  Muhammet I Sahan; Edwin S Dalmaijer; Tom Verguts; Masud Husain; Wim Fias
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2019-02-26

7.  Electrophysiological correlates of the flexible allocation of visual working memory resources.

Authors:  Christine Salahub; Holly A Lockhart; Blaire Dube; Naseem Al-Aidroos; Stephen M Emrich
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-12-19       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  A resource-rational theory of set size effects in human visual working memory.

Authors:  Ronald van den Berg; Wei Ji Ma
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2018-08-07       Impact factor: 8.140

9.  Strategic allocation of working memory resource.

Authors:  Aspen H Yoo; Zuzanna Klyszejko; Clayton E Curtis; Wei Ji Ma
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-11-01       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  Stochastic sampling provides a unifying account of visual working memory limits.

Authors:  Sebastian Schneegans; Robert Taylor; Paul M Bays
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2020-08-11       Impact factor: 11.205

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.