Anthony J Cerminara1, Christopher M LaPrade2, Sean D Smith2, Michael B Ellman1, Coen A Wijdicks2, Robert F LaPrade3. 1. Steadman Philippon Research Institute, Vail, Colorado, USA The Steadman Clinic, Vail, Colorado, USA. 2. Steadman Philippon Research Institute, Vail, Colorado, USA. 3. Steadman Philippon Research Institute, Vail, Colorado, USA The Steadman Clinic, Vail, Colorado, USA drlaprade@sprivail.org.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: A common treatment for posterior meniscal root tears is transtibial pull-out repair, which has been biomechanically reported to restore tibiofemoral contact mechanics to those of the intact knee. Biomechanical data suggest that there is significant displacement of the repaired meniscal root with cyclic loading, which may be responsible for the poor healing and meniscal extrusion demonstrated in some clinical studies. HYPOTHESIS/ PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to quantify the time-zero displacement of the posterior meniscal root in response to cyclic loading after transtibial pull-out repair and to quantify the individual contributions to displacement of the following: (1) suture elongation, (2) button-bone interface, and (3) meniscus-suture interface. The meniscus-suture interface was hypothesized to result in significantly more displacement than the button-bone interface or suture elongation. STUDY DESIGN: Descriptive laboratory study. METHODS: Transtibial pull-out repair of the posterior medial meniscal root was performed in 6 porcine knees, and cyclic displacement was measured using a loading protocol representative of postoperative rehabilitation. Displacement from (1) suture elongation, (2) the button-bone interface, and (3) the meniscus-suture interface was determined by cyclically loading 6 specimens for each construct using the same loading protocol to determine the contribution of each component to the overall displacement of the repair construct. RESULTS: After 1000 cycles, the repair construct displaced by a mean of 3.28 mm (95% CI, 2.07-4.49). The meniscus-suture component (mean, 2.52 mm; 95% CI, 2.21-2.83) displaced significantly more than the button-bone component (mean, 0.90 mm; 95% CI, 0.64-1.15; P = .006) and suture elongation component (mean, 0.71 mm; 95% CI, 0.36-1.06; P = .006) after 1000 cycles. Displacement of the button-bone and suture elongation components was not significantly different after 1000 cycles (P = .720). CONCLUSION: There was substantial displacement of the posterior medial meniscal root repaired with the transtibial pull-out technique under a cyclic loading protocol simulating postoperative rehabilitation. The meniscus-suture interface contributed to significantly more displacement than the button-bone interface and suture elongation in the transtibial pull-out repair construct. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: The results provide a framework for optimizing the transtibial pull-out repair technique. Future studies should focus on improving suture fixation strength within the meniscus-suture interface.
BACKGROUND: A common treatment for posterior meniscal root tears is transtibial pull-out repair, which has been biomechanically reported to restore tibiofemoral contact mechanics to those of the intact knee. Biomechanical data suggest that there is significant displacement of the repaired meniscal root with cyclic loading, which may be responsible for the poor healing and meniscal extrusion demonstrated in some clinical studies. HYPOTHESIS/ PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to quantify the time-zero displacement of the posterior meniscal root in response to cyclic loading after transtibial pull-out repair and to quantify the individual contributions to displacement of the following: (1) suture elongation, (2) button-bone interface, and (3) meniscus-suture interface. The meniscus-suture interface was hypothesized to result in significantly more displacement than the button-bone interface or suture elongation. STUDY DESIGN: Descriptive laboratory study. METHODS: Transtibial pull-out repair of the posterior medial meniscal root was performed in 6 porcine knees, and cyclic displacement was measured using a loading protocol representative of postoperative rehabilitation. Displacement from (1) suture elongation, (2) the button-bone interface, and (3) the meniscus-suture interface was determined by cyclically loading 6 specimens for each construct using the same loading protocol to determine the contribution of each component to the overall displacement of the repair construct. RESULTS: After 1000 cycles, the repair construct displaced by a mean of 3.28 mm (95% CI, 2.07-4.49). The meniscus-suture component (mean, 2.52 mm; 95% CI, 2.21-2.83) displaced significantly more than the button-bone component (mean, 0.90 mm; 95% CI, 0.64-1.15; P = .006) and suture elongation component (mean, 0.71 mm; 95% CI, 0.36-1.06; P = .006) after 1000 cycles. Displacement of the button-bone and suture elongation components was not significantly different after 1000 cycles (P = .720). CONCLUSION: There was substantial displacement of the posterior medial meniscal root repaired with the transtibial pull-out technique under a cyclic loading protocol simulating postoperative rehabilitation. The meniscus-suture interface contributed to significantly more displacement than the button-bone interface and suture elongation in the transtibial pull-out repair construct. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: The results provide a framework for optimizing the transtibial pull-out repair technique. Future studies should focus on improving suture fixation strength within the meniscus-suture interface.
Authors: Philipp Forkel; Constantin von Deimling; Lucca Lacheta; Florian B Imhoff; Peter Foehr; Lukas Willinger; Felix Dyrna; Wolf Petersen; Andreas B Imhoff; Rainer Burgkart Journal: Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc Date: 2018-04-27 Impact factor: 4.342
Authors: Santiago Pache; Zachary S Aman; Mitchell Kennedy; Gilberto Y Nakama; Gilbert Moatshe; Connor Ziegler; Robert F LaPrade Journal: Arch Bone Jt Surg Date: 2018-07
Authors: Christopher M LaPrade; Kyle A Jisa; Tyler R Cram; Robert F LaPrade Journal: Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc Date: 2014-09-06 Impact factor: 4.342
Authors: Philipp Forkel; Peter Foehr; Johannes C Meyer; Elmar Herbst; Wolf Petersen; Peter U Brucker; Rainer Burgkart; Andreas B Imhoff Journal: Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc Date: 2016-07-11 Impact factor: 4.342