Ana Perez-Blanca1, María Prado Nóvoa2, Maximiano Lombardo Torre3, Alejandro Espejo-Reina4, Francisco Ezquerro Juanco2, Alejandro Espejo-Baena3,4. 1. Andalucía Tech, Laboratorio de Biomecánica, Departamento de Ingeniería Mecánica, Universidad de Málaga, C/ Pedro Ortiz Ramos, s/n., Málaga, 29071, Spain. anaperez@uma.es. 2. Andalucía Tech, Laboratorio de Biomecánica, Departamento de Ingeniería Mecánica, Universidad de Málaga, C/ Pedro Ortiz Ramos, s/n., Málaga, 29071, Spain. 3. Servicio de Cirugía Ortopédica y Traumatología, Hospital Universitario Virgen de la Victoria, Málaga, Spain. 4. Hospital Vithas Parque San Antonio, Málaga, Spain.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To assess the role of suture cutout in the mechanics of failure of the repaired posterior meniscal root during the early post-operative period when using sutures of different shape. METHODS: Twenty medial porcine menisci were randomized in two groups depending on the suture shape used to repair the posterior root: thread or tape. The sutured menisci were subjected to cyclic loading (1000 cycles, (10, 30) N) followed by load-to-failure testing. Residual displacements, stiffness, and ultimate failure load were determined. During tests, the tissue-suture interface was recorded using a high-resolution camera. RESULTS: In cyclic tests, cutout progression at the suture insertion points was not observed for any specimen of either group and no differences in residual displacements were found between use of thread or tape. In load-to-failure tests, suture cutout started in all menisci at a load close to the ultimate failure and all specimens failed by suture pullout. Suture tape had a greater ultimate load with no other differences. CONCLUSIONS: In a porcine model of a repaired posterior meniscal root subjected to cyclic loads representative of current rehabilitation protocols in the early post-operative period under restricted loading conditions, suture cutout was not found as a main source of permanent root displacement when using suture thread or tape. Suture cutout progression started at high loading levels close to the ultimate load of the construct. Tape, with a meniscus-suture contact area larger than thread, produced higher ultimate load.
PURPOSE: To assess the role of suture cutout in the mechanics of failure of the repaired posterior meniscal root during the early post-operative period when using sutures of different shape. METHODS: Twenty medial porcine menisci were randomized in two groups depending on the suture shape used to repair the posterior root: thread or tape. The sutured menisci were subjected to cyclic loading (1000 cycles, (10, 30) N) followed by load-to-failure testing. Residual displacements, stiffness, and ultimate failure load were determined. During tests, the tissue-suture interface was recorded using a high-resolution camera. RESULTS: In cyclic tests, cutout progression at the suture insertion points was not observed for any specimen of either group and no differences in residual displacements were found between use of thread or tape. In load-to-failure tests, suture cutout started in all menisci at a load close to the ultimate failure and all specimens failed by suture pullout. Suture tape had a greater ultimate load with no other differences. CONCLUSIONS: In a porcine model of a repaired posterior meniscal root subjected to cyclic loads representative of current rehabilitation protocols in the early post-operative period under restricted loading conditions, suture cutout was not found as a main source of permanent root displacement when using suture thread or tape. Suture cutout progression started at high loading levels close to the ultimate load of the construct. Tape, with a meniscus-suture contact area larger than thread, produced higher ultimate load.
Authors: Ana Perez-Blanca; Alejandro Espejo-Baena; Daniel Amat Trujillo; María Prado Nóvoa; Alejandro Espejo-Reina; Clara Quintero López; Francisco Ezquerro Juanco Journal: Arthroscopy Date: 2015-11-04 Impact factor: 4.772
Authors: Alejandro Espejo-Baena; Alejandro Figueroa-Mata; José Serrano-Fernández; Francisco de la Torre-Solís Journal: Arthroscopy Date: 2007-10-03 Impact factor: 4.772
Authors: Robert F LaPrade; Christopher M LaPrade; Michael B Ellman; Travis Lee Turnbull; Anthony J Cerminara; Coen A Wijdicks Journal: Am J Sports Med Date: 2015-01-02 Impact factor: 6.202
Authors: Maria Prado-Novoa; Ana Perez-Blanca; Alejandro Espejo-Reina; Maria Jose Espejo-Reina; Alejandro Espejo-Baena Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2020-02-04 Impact factor: 4.379