Literature DB >> 25238815

Assessment of a complication risk score and study of complication profile in laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy.

Giuseppe Malleo1, Roberto Salvia, Giuseppe Mascetta, Alessandro Esposito, Luca Landoni, Luca Casetti, Laura Maggino, Claudio Bassi, Giovanni Butturini.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: This study assessed the patient-specific risk for major postoperative morbidity in a series of 100 laparoscopic distal pancreatectomies (LDP).
METHODS: A previously established complication risk score (CRS), identifying body mass index (BMI), estimated blood loss (EBL), and pancreatic specimen length as determinants of postoperative morbidity were examined against the observed outcomes. In addition, multivariate analyses were performed to investigate risk factors specific to our study population.
RESULTS: The postoperative morbidity rate was 49 %, major complication accounted for 12 %, and clinically relevant pancreatic fistulae (PF) were 13 %. The incidence of any complications, major complications, any PF, and clinically relevant PF did not vary appreciably when the CRS increased. The multivariate analysis indicated that male sex and an EBL ≥150 mL were independent predictors of major morbidity and clinically relevant PF.
CONCLUSION: In conclusion, the previously published CRS based on pre- and intraoperative factors was not able to predict the postoperative risk in our population. This is probably because risk scores may not be able to adjust for the case-mix (heterogeneity in baseline patient characteristics). According to our data, men and patients with EBL ≥150 mL are more likely to develop major postoperative complications after LDP.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25238815     DOI: 10.1007/s11605-014-2651-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg        ISSN: 1091-255X            Impact factor:   3.452


  12 in total

Review 1.  Laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy is associated with significantly less overall morbidity compared to the open technique: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Raghunandan Venkat; Barish H Edil; Richard D Schulick; Anne O Lidor; Martin A Makary; Christopher L Wolfgang
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 12.969

Review 2.  Laparoscopic left pancreatectomy: current concepts.

Authors:  Mohammad Abu Hilal; Arjun S Takhar
Journal:  Pancreatology       Date:  2013-04-26       Impact factor: 3.996

3.  Spleen-preserving distal pancreatectomy with conservation of the splenic artery and vein.

Authors:  W Kimura; T Inoue; N Futakawa; H Shinkai; I Han; T Muto
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  1996-11       Impact factor: 3.982

Review 4.  Systematic review and meta-analysis of case-matched studies comparing open and laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy: is it a safe procedure?

Authors:  Stephanos Pericleous; Nicos Middleton; Siobhan Chloe McKay; Kaye Amelia Bowers; Robert Rayner Hutchins
Journal:  Pancreas       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 3.327

5.  Laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy: trends and lessons learned through an 11-year experience.

Authors:  Peter J Kneuertz; Sameer H Patel; Carrie K Chu; Sarah B Fisher; Shishir K Maithel; Juan M Sarmiento; Sharon M Weber; Charles A Staley; David A Kooby
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2012-05-24       Impact factor: 6.113

6.  Assessment of complications after pancreatic surgery: A novel grading system applied to 633 patients undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy.

Authors:  Michelle L DeOliveira; Jordan M Winter; Markus Schafer; Steven C Cunningham; John L Cameron; Charles J Yeo; Pierre-Alain Clavien
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 12.969

7.  Twenty-three years of the Warshaw operation for distal pancreatectomy with preservation of the spleen.

Authors:  Cristina R Ferrone; Ioannis T Konstantinidis; Dushyant V Sahani; Jennifer A Wargo; Carlos Fernandez-del Castillo; Andrew L Warshaw
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 12.969

8.  Laparoscopic left pancreatectomy: complication risk score correlates with morbidity and risk for pancreatic fistula.

Authors:  Sharon M Weber; Clifford S Cho; Nipun Merchant; Scott Pinchot; Robert Rettammel; Atilla Nakeeb; David Bentrem; Alex Parikh; Ashley E Mazo; Robert C G Martin; Charles R Scoggins; Syed A Ahmad; Hong Jin Kim; Nicholas Hamilton; William Hawkins; C Max Schmidt; David A Kooby
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2009-07-16       Impact factor: 5.344

9.  National trends in resection of the distal pancreas.

Authors:  Armando Rosales-Velderrain; Steven P Bowers; Ross F Goldberg; Tatyan M Clarke; Mauricia A Buchanan; John A Stauffer; Horacio J Asbun
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2012-08-28       Impact factor: 5.742

10.  Laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy: results on a consecutive series of 58 patients.

Authors:  Gianluigi Melotti; Giovanni Butturini; Micaela Piccoli; Luca Casetti; Claudio Bassi; Barbara Mullineris; Maria Grazia Lazzaretti; Paolo Pederzoli
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 12.969

View more
  5 in total

Review 1.  Pancreatic surgery in Italy. Criteria to identify the hospital units and the tertiary referral centers entitled to perform it.

Authors:  Claudio Bassi; Giampaolo Balzano; Alessandro Zerbi; Marco Ramera
Journal:  Updates Surg       Date:  2016-06-07

2.  Laparoscopic versus open distal pancreatectomy-a propensity score-matched analysis from the German StuDoQ|Pancreas registry.

Authors:  Ulrich Friedrich Wellner; Hryhoriy Lapshyn; Detlef K Bartsch; Ioannis Mintziras; Ulrich Theodor Hopt; Uwe Wittel; Hans-Jörg Krämling; Hubert Preissinger-Heinzel; Matthias Anthuber; Bernd Geissler; Jörg Köninger; Katharina Feilhauer; Merten Hommann; Luisa Peter; Natascha C Nüssler; Thomas Klier; Ulrich Mansmann; Tobias Keck
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2016-11-04       Impact factor: 2.571

3.  Visceral Obesity and Open Passive Drainage Increase the Risk of Pancreatic Fistula Following Distal Pancreatectomy.

Authors:  Charles Vanbrugghe; Maxime Ronot; François Cauchy; Christian Hobeika; Safi Dokmak; Béatrice Aussilhou; Emilia Ragot; Sébastien Gaujoux; Olivier Soubrane; Philippe Lévy; Alain Sauvanet
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2018-08-17       Impact factor: 3.452

Review 4.  Recent Advances in Pancreatic Cancer Surgery.

Authors:  Laura Maggino; Charles M Vollmer
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Gastroenterol       Date:  2017-12

5.  Male gender and increased body mass index independently predicts clinically relevant morbidity after spleen-preserving distal pancreatectomy.

Authors:  Traian Dumitrascu; Mihai Eftimie; Andra Aiordachioae; Cezar Stroescu; Simona Dima; Mihnea Ionescu; Irinel Popescu
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2018-11-27
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.