Literature DB >> 25238814

Is nasogastric or nasojejunal decompression necessary following gastrectomy for gastric cancer? A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.

Da Wang1, Tingting Li, Jiang Yu, Yanfeng Hu, Hao Liu, Guoxin Li.   

Abstract

Whether nasogastric or nasojejunal decompression (ND) prevents anastomotic leakage, hastens the return of bowel function, and shortens hospital stay after gastrectomy for gastric cancer has long been controversial. We evaluated the necessity of routine ND after radical gastrectomy for gastric cancer with a systematic review and meta-analysis. We searched literature published prior to January 2014 in PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and BIOSIS Previews for relevant randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Only prospective RCTs comparing individuals with and without ND after gastrectomy for gastric cancer were included. Outcome measures included time to first flatus, time to starting oral diet, anastomotic leakage, pulmonary complications, wound dehiscence, length of hospital stay, morbidity, and mortality. Cochrane Collaboration RevMan 5.2 software was used for the meta-analysis. Eight RCT studies fulfilled our inclusion criteria. Of the 1,141 patients in those RCTs, 570 received nasogastric or nasojejunal decompression and 571 did not. Anastomotic leakage, pulmonary complications, wound dehiscence, morbidity, and mortality were comparable between the groups. Stratified by the type of gastrectomy or gastrojejunostomy, no significant differences in above mentioned outcomes were observed in subgroup analyses. The no ND group displayed a significantly shorter time to oral diet (weighted mean difference [WMD] = 0.45, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.29 to 0.61, p < 0.001) and a marginally shorter end of hospital stay (WMD = 0.48, 95% CI = -0.01 to 0.98, p = 0.05). The ND group significantly shortened time to first flatus (WMD = -0.7, 95% CI = -1.13 to -0.27, p = 0.001), especially with Roux-en-Y reconstruction (WMD = -1.0, 95 % CI = -1.52 to -0.48, p = 0.0002) and prolonged time to starting oral diet (WMD = 0.52, 95% CI = 0.13 to 0.90, p = 0.009) in the patients with subtotal gastrectomy. Routine ND appears to be unnecessary after gastrectomy for gastric cancer, irrespective of the extent of resection, and the type of digestive reconstruction.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25238814     DOI: 10.1007/s11605-014-2648-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg        ISSN: 1091-255X            Impact factor:   3.452


  17 in total

1.  Correlation of quality measures with estimates of treatment effect in meta-analyses of randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Ethan M Balk; Peter A L Bonis; Harry Moskowitz; Christopher H Schmid; John P A Ioannidis; Chenchen Wang; Joseph Lau
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2002-06-12       Impact factor: 56.272

2.  Efficacy and necessity of nasojejunal tube after gastrectomy.

Authors:  A Tavassoli; M T Rajabi; A Abdollahi; R Bagheri; S Noorshafiee
Journal:  Int J Surg       Date:  2010-12-15       Impact factor: 6.071

Review 3.  Review of the pathophysiology and management of postoperative ileus.

Authors:  Peter Mattei; John L Rombeau
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 3.352

4.  Nasojejunal tube placement after total gastrectomy: a multicenter prospective randomized trial.

Authors:  Giovanni Battista Doglietto; Valerio Papa; Antonio Pio Tortorelli; Maurizio Bossola; Marcello Covino; Fabio Pacelli
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  2004-12

5.  Naso-gastric or naso-jejunal decompression after partial distal gastrectomy for gastric cancer. Final results of a multicenter prospective randomized trial.

Authors:  Fabio Pacelli; Fausto Rosa; Daniele Marrelli; Paolo Morgagni; Massimo Framarini; Luigi Cristadoro; Corrado Pedrazzani; Riccardo Casadei; Luca Cozzaglio; Marcello Covino; Annibale Donini; Franco Roviello; Giovanni de Manzoni; Giovanni Battista Doglietto
Journal:  Gastric Cancer       Date:  2013-11-30       Impact factor: 7.370

Review 6.  Function-preserving surgery for gastric cancer.

Authors:  Hitoshi Katai
Journal:  Int J Clin Oncol       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 3.402

7.  Incidence of and risk factors for pulmonary complications after nonthoracic surgery.

Authors:  Finlay A McAlister; Kimberly Bertsch; Jeremy Man; John Bradley; Michael Jacka
Journal:  Am J Respir Crit Care Med       Date:  2004-11-24       Impact factor: 21.405

8.  Comparison of gastric cancer surgery with versus without nasogastric decompression.

Authors:  Jun Ho Lee; Woo Jin Hyung; Sung Hoon Noh
Journal:  Yonsei Med J       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 2.759

9.  There is no need for nasogastric decompression after partial gastrectomy with extensive lymphadenectomy.

Authors:  C C Wu; C R Hwang; T J Liu
Journal:  Eur J Surg       Date:  1994 Jun-Jul

10.  A meta-analysis of selective versus routine nasogastric decompression after elective laparotomy.

Authors:  M L Cheatham; W C Chapman; S P Key; J L Sawyers
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1995-05       Impact factor: 12.969

View more
  6 in total

Review 1.  State of the art of enhance recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocols in esophagogastric cancer surgery: the Western experience.

Authors:  Silvia Salvans; Luis Grande; Mariagiulia Dal Cero; Manuel Pera
Journal:  Updates Surg       Date:  2022-06-21

2.  Omitting nasogastric tube placement after gastrectomy does not enhance postoperative recovery: a propensity score matched analysis.

Authors:  Qi Wang; Zhouqiao Wu; Jinyao Shi; Shiyang Hou; Fei Shan; Shuangxi Li; Yan Zhang; Ziyu Li; Jiafu Ji
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2021-09-21       Impact factor: 2.895

3.  Protocol for enhanced recovery after surgery with 3D laparoscopic excision for choledochal cysts can benefit the recovery process.

Authors:  Yunpu Tan; Yingying Shen; Le Li; Jiakang Yu
Journal:  Pediatr Surg Int       Date:  2020-03-26       Impact factor: 1.827

4.  Laparoscopic Gastrectomy with Enhanced Recovery After Surgery Protocol: Single-Center Experience.

Authors:  Magdalena Pisarska; Michał Pędziwiatr; Piotr Major; Michał Kisielewski; Marcin Migaczewski; Mateusz Rubinkiewicz; Piotr Budzyński; Krzysztof Przęczek; Anna Zub-Pokrowiecka; Andrzej Budzyński
Journal:  Med Sci Monit       Date:  2017-03-23

5.  Impact of routine nasogastric decompression versus no nasogastric decompression after pancreaticoduodenectomy on perioperative outcomes: meta-analysis.

Authors:  Khaled Ammar; Chris Varghese; Thejasvin K; Viswakumar Prabakaran; Stuart Robinson; Samir Pathak; Bobby V M Dasari; Sanjay Pandanaboyana
Journal:  BJS Open       Date:  2021-11-09

6.  Efficacy of gastric decompression after pancreatic surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Jia Gao; Xinchun Liu; Haoran Wang; Rongchao Ying
Journal:  BMC Gastroenterol       Date:  2020-04-25       Impact factor: 3.067

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.