Literature DB >> 25237807

A multi-scale distribution model for non-equilibrium populations suggests resource limitation in an endangered rodent.

William T Bean1, Robert Stafford2, H Scott Butterfield3, Justin S Brashares4.   

Abstract

Species distributions are known to be limited by biotic and abiotic factors at multiple temporal and spatial scales. Species distribution models, however, frequently assume a population at equilibrium in both time and space. Studies of habitat selection have repeatedly shown the difficulty of estimating resource selection if the scale or extent of analysis is incorrect. Here, we present a multi-step approach to estimate the realized and potential distribution of the endangered giant kangaroo rat. First, we estimate the potential distribution by modeling suitability at a range-wide scale using static bioclimatic variables. We then examine annual changes in extent at a population-level. We define "available" habitat based on the total suitable potential distribution at the range-wide scale. Then, within the available habitat, model changes in population extent driven by multiple measures of resource availability. By modeling distributions for a population with robust estimates of population extent through time, and ecologically relevant predictor variables, we improved the predictive ability of SDMs, as well as revealed an unanticipated relationship between population extent and precipitation at multiple scales. At a range-wide scale, the best model indicated the giant kangaroo rat was limited to areas that received little to no precipitation in the summer months. In contrast, the best model for shorter time scales showed a positive relation with resource abundance, driven by precipitation, in the current and previous year. These results suggest that the distribution of the giant kangaroo rat was limited to the wettest parts of the drier areas within the study region. This multi-step approach reinforces the differing relationship species may have with environmental variables at different scales, provides a novel method for defining "available" habitat in habitat selection studies, and suggests a way to create distribution models at spatial and temporal scales relevant to theoretical and applied ecologists.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25237807      PMCID: PMC4169526          DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0106638

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  PLoS One        ISSN: 1932-6203            Impact factor:   3.240


  5 in total

1.  Relating populations to habitats using resource selection functions.

Authors: 
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  1999-07       Impact factor: 17.712

2.  Using the satellite-derived NDVI to assess ecological responses to environmental change.

Authors:  Nathalie Pettorelli; Jon Olav Vik; Atle Mysterud; Jean-Michel Gaillard; Compton J Tucker; Nils Chr Stenseth
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  2005-06-09       Impact factor: 17.712

3.  Aligning conservation priorities across taxa in Madagascar with high-resolution planning tools.

Authors:  C Kremen; A Cameron; A Moilanen; S J Phillips; C D Thomas; H Beentje; J Dransfield; B L Fisher; F Glaw; T C Good; G J Harper; R J Hijmans; D C Lees; E Louis; R A Nussbaum; C J Raxworthy; A Razafimpahanana; G E Schatz; M Vences; D R Vieites; P C Wright; M L Zjhra
Journal:  Science       Date:  2008-04-11       Impact factor: 47.728

4.  Comparing niche- and process-based models to reduce prediction uncertainty in species range shifts under climate change.

Authors:  Xavier Morin; Wilfried Thuiller
Journal:  Ecology       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 5.499

5.  Partitioning the effects of an ecosystem engineer: kangaroo rats control community structure via multiple pathways.

Authors:  Laura R Prugh; Justin S Brashares
Journal:  J Anim Ecol       Date:  2011-11-18       Impact factor: 5.091

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.