Literature DB >> 19537550

Comparing niche- and process-based models to reduce prediction uncertainty in species range shifts under climate change.

Xavier Morin1, Wilfried Thuiller.   

Abstract

Obtaining reliable predictions of species range shifts under climate change is a crucial challenge for ecologists and stakeholders. At the continental scale, niche-based models have been widely used in the last 10 years to predict the potential impacts of climate change on species distributions all over the world, although these models do not include any mechanistic relationships. In contrast, species-specific, process-based predictions remain scarce at the continental scale. This is regrettable because to secure relevant and accurate predictions it is always desirable to compare predictions derived from different kinds of models applied independently to the same set of species and using the same raw data. Here we compare predictions of range shifts under climate change scenarios for 2100 derived from niche-based models with those of a process-based model for 15 North American boreal and temperate tree species. A general pattern emerged from our comparisons: niche-based models tend to predict a stronger level of extinction and a greater proportion of colonization than the process-based model. This result likely arises because niche-based models do not take phenotypic plasticity and local adaptation into account. Nevertheless, as the two kinds of models rely on different assumptions, their complementarity is revealed by common findings. Both modeling approaches highlight a major potential limitation on species tracking their climatic niche because of migration constraints and identify similar zones where species extirpation is likely. Such convergent predictions from models built on very different principles provide a useful way to offset uncertainties at the continental scale. This study shows that the use in concert of both approaches with their own caveats and advantages is crucial to obtain more robust results and that comparisons among models are needed in the near future to gain accuracy regarding predictions of range shifts under climate change.

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19537550     DOI: 10.1890/08-0134.1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ecology        ISSN: 0012-9658            Impact factor:   5.499


  50 in total

1.  Sporadic rainy events are more critical than increasing of drought intensity for woody species recruitment in a Mediterranean community.

Authors:  Luis Matías; Regino Zamora; Jorge Castro
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2012-01-05       Impact factor: 3.225

2.  Modelling ecological systems in a changing world.

Authors:  Matthew R Evans
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2012-01-19       Impact factor: 6.237

Review 3.  Why does phenology drive species distribution?

Authors:  Isabelle Chuine
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2010-10-12       Impact factor: 6.237

4.  Building the bridge between animal movement and population dynamics.

Authors:  Juan M Morales; Paul R Moorcroft; Jason Matthiopoulos; Jacqueline L Frair; John G Kie; Roger A Powell; Evelyn H Merrill; Daniel T Haydon
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2010-07-27       Impact factor: 6.237

5.  Present and future global distributions of the marine Cyanobacteria Prochlorococcus and Synechococcus.

Authors:  Pedro Flombaum; José L Gallegos; Rodolfo A Gordillo; José Rincón; Lina L Zabala; Nianzhi Jiao; David M Karl; William K W Li; Michael W Lomas; Daniele Veneziano; Carolina S Vera; Jasper A Vrugt; Adam C Martiny
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2013-05-23       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Ecology and the ratchet of events: climate variability, niche dimensions, and species distributions.

Authors:  Stephen T Jackson; Julio L Betancourt; Robert K Booth; Stephen T Gray
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2009-09-23       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Climate warming could increase recruitment success in glacier foreland plants.

Authors:  Andrea Mondoni; Simone Pedrini; Giulietta Bernareggi; Graziano Rossi; Thomas Abeli; Robin J Probert; Michele Ghitti; Costantino Bonomi; Simone Orsenigo
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2015-07-01       Impact factor: 4.357

8.  Partitioning prediction uncertainty in climate-dependent population models.

Authors:  Gilles Gauthier; Guillaume Péron; Jean-Dominique Lebreton; Patrick Grenier; Louise van Oudenhove
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2016-12-28       Impact factor: 5.349

9.  Influences of forest structure, climate and species composition on tree mortality across the eastern US.

Authors:  Emily R Lines; David A Coomes; Drew W Purves
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-10-13       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Projected loss of a salamander diversity hotspot as a consequence of projected global climate change.

Authors:  Joseph R Milanovich; William E Peterman; Nathan P Nibbelink; John C Maerz
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-08-16       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.