Literature DB >> 25236447

Using Drosophila melanogaster to identify chemotherapy toxicity genes.

Elizabeth G King1, Galina Kislukhin2, Kelli N Walters2, Anthony D Long2.   

Abstract

The severity of the toxic side effects of chemotherapy shows a great deal of interindividual variability, and much of this variation is likely genetically based. Simple DNA tests predictive of toxic side effects could revolutionize the way chemotherapy is carried out. Due to the challenges in identifying polymorphisms that affect toxicity in humans, we use Drosophila fecundity following oral exposure to carboplatin, gemcitabine and mitomycin C as a model system to identify naturally occurring DNA variants predictive of toxicity. We use the Drosophila Synthetic Population Resource (DSPR), a panel of recombinant inbred lines derived from a multiparent advanced intercross, to map quantitative trait loci affecting chemotoxicity. We identify two QTL each for carboplatin and gemcitabine toxicity and none for mitomycin. One QTL is associated with fly orthologs of a priori human carboplatin candidate genes ABCC2 and MSH2, and a second QTL is associated with fly orthologs of human gemcitabine candidate genes RRM2 and RRM2B. The third, a carboplatin QTL, is associated with a posteriori human orthologs from solute carrier family 7A, INPP4A&B, and NALCN. The fourth, a gemcitabine QTL that also affects methotrexate toxicity, is associated with human ortholog GPx4. Mapped QTL each explain a significant fraction of variation in toxicity, yet individual SNPs and transposable elements in the candidate gene regions fail to singly explain QTL peaks. Furthermore, estimates of founder haplotype effects are consistent with genes harboring several segregating functional alleles. We find little evidence for nonsynonymous SNPs explaining mapped QTL; thus it seems likely that standing variation in toxicity is due to regulatory alleles.
Copyright © 2014 by the Genetics Society of America.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Drosophila Synthetic Population Resource; MPP; Multiparent Advanced Generation Inter-Cross (MAGIC); Multiparental populations; advanced intercross line; chemotoxicity; complex traits; genetic heterogeneity; pharmacogenomics; quantitative trait loci

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25236447      PMCID: PMC4174942          DOI: 10.1534/genetics.114.161968

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genetics        ISSN: 0016-6731            Impact factor:   4.562


  43 in total

1.  Polymorphisms in hMSH2 and hMLH1 and response to platinum-based chemotherapy in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer patients.

Authors:  Hongyan Cheng; Ning Sun; Xinchen Sun; Baoan Chen; Fan Li; Jifeng Feng; Lu Cheng; Yuandong Cao
Journal:  Acta Biochim Biophys Sin (Shanghai)       Date:  2010-05-15       Impact factor: 3.848

2.  Theoretical basis of the Beavis effect.

Authors:  Shizhong Xu
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 4.562

3.  Poor performance of bootstrap confidence intervals for the location of a quantitative trait locus.

Authors:  Ani Manichaikul; Josée Dupuis; Saunak Sen; Karl W Broman
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2006-06-18       Impact factor: 4.562

4.  ABCC2 (MRP2, cMOAT) can be localized in the nuclear membrane of ovarian carcinomas and correlates with resistance to cisplatin and clinical outcome.

Authors:  Pawel Surowiak; Verena Materna; Irina Kaplenko; Marek Spaczynski; Barbara Dolinska-Krajewska; Elzbieta Gebarowska; Manfred Dietel; Maciej Zabel; Hermann Lage
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2006-12-01       Impact factor: 12.531

5.  Prognostic implications of genetic variants in advanced non-small cell lung cancer: a genome-wide association study.

Authors:  Youngjoo Lee; Kyong-Ah Yoon; Jungnam Joo; Donghoon Lee; Kieun Bae; Ji-Youn Han; Jin Soo Lee
Journal:  Carcinogenesis       Date:  2012-11-08       Impact factor: 4.944

Review 6.  Pharmacogenomics knowledge for personalized medicine.

Authors:  M Whirl-Carrillo; E M McDonagh; J M Hebert; L Gong; K Sangkuhl; C F Thorn; R B Altman; T E Klein
Journal:  Clin Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 6.875

7.  Assessment of cell viability, lipid peroxidation and quantification of DNA fragmentation after the treatment of anticancerous drug mitomycin C and curcumin in cultured human blood lymphocytes.

Authors:  Yasir Hasan Siddique; Gulshan Ara; Tanveer Beg; Jyoti Gupta; Mohammad Afzal
Journal:  Exp Toxicol Pathol       Date:  2009-07-15

Review 8.  Pharmacogenomics: a tool for improving cancer chemotherapy.

Authors:  Mariano Monzó; Alfons Navarro; Gerardo Ferrer; Rosa Artells
Journal:  Clin Transl Oncol       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 3.405

9.  Properties and modeling of GWAS when complex disease risk is due to non-complementing, deleterious mutations in genes of large effect.

Authors:  Kevin R Thornton; Andrew J Foran; Anthony D Long
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2013-02-21       Impact factor: 5.917

10.  Basal-like Breast cancer DNA copy number losses identify genes involved in genomic instability, response to therapy, and patient survival.

Authors:  Victor J Weigman; Hann-Hsiang Chao; Andrey A Shabalin; Xiaping He; Joel S Parker; Silje H Nordgard; Tatyana Grushko; Dezheng Huo; Chika Nwachukwu; Andrew Nobel; Vessela N Kristensen; Anne-Lise Børresen-Dale; Olufunmilayo I Olopade; Charles M Perou
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2011-11-03       Impact factor: 4.872

View more
  15 in total

Review 1.  Dissecting complex traits using the Drosophila Synthetic Population Resource.

Authors:  Anthony D Long; Stuart J Macdonald; Elizabeth G King
Journal:  Trends Genet       Date:  2014-08-28       Impact factor: 11.639

2.  Recent developments in in vitro and in vivo models for improved translation of preclinical pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics data.

Authors:  Jaydeep Yadav; Mehdi El Hassani; Jasleen Sodhi; Volker M Lauschke; Jessica H Hartman; Laura E Russell
Journal:  Drug Metab Rev       Date:  2021-05-25       Impact factor: 6.984

3.  Genetic dissection of intraspecific variation in a male-specific sexual trait in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  K M Cloud-Richardson; B R Smith; S J Macdonald
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2016-08-17       Impact factor: 3.821

4.  A Variable Genetic Architecture of Melanic Evolution in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  Héloïse Bastide; Jeremy D Lange; Justin B Lack; Amir Yassin; John E Pool
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2016-09-16       Impact factor: 4.562

5.  Natural variation in a single amino acid substitution underlies physiological responses to topoisomerase II poisons.

Authors:  Stefan Zdraljevic; Christine Strand; Hannah S Seidel; Daniel E Cook; John G Doench; Erik C Andersen
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2017-07-12       Impact factor: 5.917

6.  Genetic background influences susceptibility to chemotherapy-induced hematotoxicity.

Authors:  D M Gatti; S N Weber; N C Goodwin; F Lammert; G A Churchill
Journal:  Pharmacogenomics J       Date:  2017-06-13       Impact factor: 3.550

7.  Hidden genetic variation shapes the structure of functional elements in Drosophila.

Authors:  Mahul Chakraborty; Nicholas W VanKuren; Roy Zhao; Xinwen Zhang; Shannon Kalsow; J J Emerson
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2017-12-18       Impact factor: 38.330

8.  The Beavis Effect in Next-Generation Mapping Panels in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  Elizabeth G King; Anthony D Long
Journal:  G3 (Bethesda)       Date:  2017-06-07       Impact factor: 3.154

9.  Identifying Loci Contributing to Natural Variation in Xenobiotic Resistance in Drosophila.

Authors:  Michael A Najarro; Jennifer L Hackett; Brittny R Smith; Chad A Highfill; Elizabeth G King; Anthony D Long; Stuart J Macdonald
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2015-11-30       Impact factor: 5.917

10.  Strong epistatic and additive effects of linked candidate SNPs for Drosophila pigmentation have implications for analysis of genome-wide association studies results.

Authors:  Jean-Michel Gibert; Jorge Blanco; Marlies Dolezal; Viola Nolte; Frédérique Peronnet; Christian Schlötterer
Journal:  Genome Biol       Date:  2017-07-03       Impact factor: 13.583

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.