Literature DB >> 25233880

Moving beyond qualitative evaluations of Bayesian models of cognition.

Pernille Hemmer1, Sean Tauber, Mark Steyvers.   

Abstract

Bayesian models of cognition provide a powerful way to understand the behavior and goals of individuals from a computational point of view. Much of the focus in the Bayesian cognitive modeling approach has been on qualitative model evaluations, where predictions from the models are compared to data that is often averaged over individuals. In many cognitive tasks, however, there are pervasive individual differences. We introduce an approach to directly infer individual differences related to subjective mental representations within the framework of Bayesian models of cognition. In this approach, Bayesian data analysis methods are used to estimate cognitive parameters and motivate the inference process within a Bayesian cognitive model. We illustrate this integrative Bayesian approach on a model of memory. We apply the model to behavioral data from a memory experiment involving the recall of heights of people. A cross-validation analysis shows that the Bayesian memory model with inferred subjective priors predicts withheld data better than a Bayesian model where the priors are based on environmental statistics. In addition, the model with inferred priors at the individual subject level led to the best overall generalization performance, suggesting that individual differences are important to consider in Bayesian models of cognition.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25233880     DOI: 10.3758/s13423-014-0725-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev        ISSN: 1069-9384


  23 in total

Review 1.  Toward a method of selecting among computational models of cognition.

Authors:  Mark A Pitt; In Jae Myung; Shaobo Zhang
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 8.934

2.  Is that what Bayesians believe? reply to Griffiths, Chater, Norris, and Pouget (2012).

Authors:  Jeffrey S Bowers; Colin J Davis
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  2012-05       Impact factor: 17.737

3.  Modeling individual differences in cognition.

Authors:  Michael D Lee; Michael R Webb
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2005-08

4.  How robust are probabilistic models of higher-level cognition?

Authors:  Gary F Marcus; Ernest Davis
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2013-10-01

5.  Bayesian hypothesis testing for psychologists: a tutorial on the Savage-Dickey method.

Authors:  Eric-Jan Wagenmakers; Tom Lodewyckx; Himanshu Kuriyal; Raoul Grasman
Journal:  Cogn Psychol       Date:  2010-01-12       Impact factor: 3.468

6.  A model for recognition memory: REM-retrieving effectively from memory.

Authors:  R M Shiffrin; M Steyvers
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  1997-06

7.  A Bayesian account of reconstructive memory.

Authors:  Pernille Hemmer; Mark Steyvers
Journal:  Top Cogn Sci       Date:  2009-01

8.  A Model of Knower-Level Behavior in Number-Concept Development.

Authors:  Michael D Lee; Barbara W Sarnecka
Journal:  Cogn Sci       Date:  2010-01-01

9.  Individual differences in working memory capacity and episodic retrieval: examining the dynamics of delayed and continuous distractor free recall.

Authors:  Nash Unsworth
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 3.051

10.  A rational analysis of the effects of memory biases on serial reproduction.

Authors:  Jing Xu; Thomas L Griffiths
Journal:  Cogn Psychol       Date:  2009-10-30       Impact factor: 3.468

View more
  5 in total

1.  Category effects on stimulus estimation: Shifting and skewed frequency distributions-A reexamination.

Authors:  Sean Duffy; John Smith
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2018-10

Review 2.  A rational model of function learning.

Authors:  Christopher G Lucas; Thomas L Griffiths; Joseph J Williams; Michael L Kalish
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2015-03-03

3.  Mnemonic construction and representation of temporal structure in the hippocampal formation.

Authors:  Jacob L S Bellmund; Lorena Deuker; Nicole D Montijn; Christian F Doeller
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2022-06-23       Impact factor: 17.694

4.  Why are the batteries in the microwave?: Use of semantic information under uncertainty in a search task.

Authors:  Gwendolyn L Rehrig; Michelle Cheng; Brian C McMahan; Rahul Shome
Journal:  Cogn Res Princ Implic       Date:  2021-04-14

Review 5.  Too Blind to See the Elephant? Why Neuroscientists Ought to Be Interested in Tinnitus.

Authors:  Marlies Knipper; Birgit Mazurek; Pim van Dijk; Holger Schulze
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2021-10-22
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.