Literature DB >> 25732094

A rational model of function learning.

Christopher G Lucas1, Thomas L Griffiths2, Joseph J Williams3, Michael L Kalish4.   

Abstract

Theories of how people learn relationships between continuous variables have tended to focus on two possibilities: one, that people are estimating explicit functions, or two that they are performing associative learning supported by similarity. We provide a rational analysis of function learning, drawing on work on regression in machine learning and statistics. Using the equivalence of Bayesian linear regression and Gaussian processes, which provide a probabilistic basis for similarity-based function learning, we show that learning explicit rules and using similarity can be seen as two views of one solution to this problem. We use this insight to define a rational model of human function learning that combines the strengths of both approaches and accounts for a wide variety of experimental results.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bayesian modeling; Function learning

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25732094     DOI: 10.3758/s13423-015-0808-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev        ISSN: 1069-9384


  17 in total

1.  Simplified learning in complex situations: knowledge partitioning in function learning.

Authors:  Stephan Lewandowsky; Michael Kalish; S K Ngang
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  2002-06

2.  Simplicity: a unifying principle in cognitive science?

Authors:  Nick Chater; Paul Vitányi
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 20.229

3.  Rational approximations to rational models: alternative algorithms for category learning.

Authors:  Adam N Sanborn; Thomas L Griffiths; Daniel J Navarro
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 8.934

4.  The conceptual basis of function learning and extrapolation: comparison of rule-based and associative-based models.

Authors:  Mark A McDaniel; Jerome R Busemeyer
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2005-02

5.  Function learning: induction of continuous stimulus-response relations.

Authors:  K Koh; D E Meyer
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  1991-09       Impact factor: 3.051

6.  Toward a universal law of generalization for psychological science.

Authors:  R N Shepard
Journal:  Science       Date:  1987-09-11       Impact factor: 47.728

7.  Extrapolation: the sine qua non for abstraction in function learning.

Authors:  E L DeLosh; J R Busemeyer; M A McDaniel
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  1997-07       Impact factor: 3.051

8.  Population of linear experts: knowledge partitioning and function learning.

Authors:  Michael L Kalish; Stephan Lewandowsky; John K Kruschke
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 8.934

9.  Rules and exemplars in category learning.

Authors:  M A Erickson; J K Kruschke
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  1998-06

10.  Iterated learning: intergenerational knowledge transmission reveals inductive biases.

Authors:  Michael L Kaush; Thomas L Griffiths; Stephan Lewandowsky
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2007-04
View more
  7 in total

1.  Generalization guides human exploration in vast decision spaces.

Authors:  Charley M Wu; Eric Schulz; Maarten Speekenbrink; Jonathan D Nelson; Björn Meder
Journal:  Nat Hum Behav       Date:  2018-11-12

2.  Long term study of motivational and cognitive effects of low-intensity focused ultrasound neuromodulation in the dorsal striatum of nonhuman primates.

Authors:  F Munoz; A Meaney; A Gross; K Liu; A N Pouliopoulos; D Liu; E E Konofagou; V P Ferrera
Journal:  Brain Stimul       Date:  2022-01-29       Impact factor: 9.184

3.  Transitive inference in humans (Homo sapiens) and rhesus macaques (Macaca mulatta) after massed training of the last two list items.

Authors:  Greg Jensen; Yelda Alkan; Fabian Muñoz; Vincent P Ferrera; Herbert S Terrace
Journal:  J Comp Psychol       Date:  2017-03-23       Impact factor: 2.231

4.  Bayesian regression explains how human participants handle parameter uncertainty.

Authors:  Jannes Jegminat; Maya A Jastrzębowska; Matthew V Pachai; Michael H Herzog; Jean-Pascal Pfister
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2020-05-18       Impact factor: 4.475

5.  How Do People Generalize Causal Relations over Objects? A Non-parametric Bayesian Account.

Authors:  Bonan Zhao; Christopher G Lucas; Neil R Bramley
Journal:  Comput Brain Behav       Date:  2021-11-30

Review 6.  The augmented radiologist: artificial intelligence in the practice of radiology.

Authors:  Erich Sorantin; Michael G Grasser; Ariane Hemmelmayr; Sebastian Tschauner; Franko Hrzic; Veronika Weiss; Jana Lacekova; Andreas Holzinger
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2021-10-19

7.  Instance-based generalization for human judgments about uncertainty.

Authors:  Philipp Schustek; Rubén Moreno-Bote
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2018-06-04       Impact factor: 4.475

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.