Literature DB >> 25233839

Lord-Wingersky Algorithm Version 2.0 for Hierarchical Item Factor Models with Applications in Test Scoring, Scale Alignment, and Model Fit Testing.

Li Cai1.   

Abstract

Lord and Wingersky's (Appl Psychol Meas 8:453-461, 1984) recursive algorithm for creating summed score based likelihoods and posteriors has a proven track record in unidimensional item response theory (IRT) applications. Extending the recursive algorithm to handle multidimensionality is relatively simple, especially with fixed quadrature because the recursions can be defined on a grid formed by direct products of quadrature points. However, the increase in computational burden remains exponential in the number of dimensions, making the implementation of the recursive algorithm cumbersome for truly high-dimensional models. In this paper, a dimension reduction method that is specific to the Lord-Wingersky recursions is developed. This method can take advantage of the restrictions implied by hierarchical item factor models, e.g., the bifactor model, the testlet model, or the two-tier model, such that a version of the Lord-Wingersky recursive algorithm can operate on a dramatically reduced set of quadrature points. For instance, in a bifactor model, the dimension of integration is always equal to 2, regardless of the number of factors. The new algorithm not only provides an effective mechanism to produce summed score to IRT scaled score translation tables properly adjusted for residual dependence, but leads to new applications in test scoring, linking, and model fit checking as well. Simulated and empirical examples are used to illustrate the new applications.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25233839      PMCID: PMC4366368          DOI: 10.1007/s11336-014-9411-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychometrika        ISSN: 0033-3123            Impact factor:   2.500


  9 in total

1.  Summed-score linking using item response theory: application to depression measurement.

Authors:  M Orlando; C D Sherbourne; D Thissen
Journal:  Psychol Assess       Date:  2000-09

2.  Item factor analysis: current approaches and future directions.

Authors:  R J Wirth; Michael C Edwards
Journal:  Psychol Methods       Date:  2007-03

3.  Psychometric evaluation and calibration of health-related quality of life item banks: plans for the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS).

Authors:  Bryce B Reeve; Ron D Hays; Jakob B Bjorner; Karon F Cook; Paul K Crane; Jeanne A Teresi; David Thissen; Dennis A Revicki; David J Weiss; Ronald K Hambleton; Honghu Liu; Richard Gershon; Steven P Reise; Jin-shei Lai; David Cella
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 2.983

4.  An empirical study of a logistic mental test model.

Authors:  J Ross
Journal:  Psychometrika       Date:  1966-09       Impact factor: 2.500

5.  Generalized full-information item bifactor analysis.

Authors:  Li Cai; Ji Seung Yang; Mark Hansen
Journal:  Psychol Methods       Date:  2011-09

6.  Using the PedsQL™ 3.0 asthma module to obtain scores comparable with those of the PROMIS pediatric asthma impact scale (PAIS).

Authors:  David Thissen; James W Varni; Brian D Stucky; Yang Liu; Debra E Irwin; Darren A Dewalt
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2011-03-08       Impact factor: 4.147

7.  Invited Paper: The Rediscovery of Bifactor Measurement Models.

Authors:  Steven P Reise
Journal:  Multivariate Behav Res       Date:  2012-09-01       Impact factor: 5.923

8.  Empirically indistinguishable multidimensional IRT and locally dependent unidimensional item response models.

Authors:  Edward Haksing Ip
Journal:  Br J Math Stat Psychol       Date:  2009-10-16       Impact factor: 3.380

9.  Latent Class Models for Diary Method Data: Parameter Estimation by Local Computations.

Authors:  Frank Rijmen; Kristof Vansteelandt; Paul De Boeck
Journal:  Psychometrika       Date:  2007-10-04       Impact factor: 2.500

  9 in total
  6 in total

1.  A Note on the Poisson's Binomial Distribution in Item Response Theory.

Authors:  Jorge González; Marie Wiberg; Alina A von Davier
Journal:  Appl Psychol Meas       Date:  2016-02-14

2.  Physical function metric over measure: An illustration with the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) and the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy (FACT).

Authors:  Aaron J Kaat; Benjamin D Schalet; Joshua Rutsohn; Roxanne E Jensen; David Cella
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2017-09-08       Impact factor: 6.860

3.  Linking Scores with Patient-Reported Health Outcome Instruments: A Validation Study and Comparison of Three Linking Methods.

Authors:  Benjamin D Schalet; Sangdon Lim; David Cella; Seung W Choi
Journal:  Psychometrika       Date:  2021-06-26       Impact factor: 2.500

4.  Performance of the S - χ 2 Statistic for the Multidimensional Graded Response Model.

Authors:  Shiyang Su; Chun Wang; David J Weiss
Journal:  Educ Psychol Meas       Date:  2020-09-23       Impact factor: 3.088

5.  Establishing a Longitudinal Comparable Scale of Chinese Children's Cognitive Development through Calibrated Projection Linking.

Authors:  Xiangzi Ouyang; Qiusi Zhang; Tao Xin; Fu Liu
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2018-02-22

6.  Reliability and validity of the 6-item Headache Impact Test in chronic migraine from the PROMISE-2 study.

Authors:  Carrie R Houts; James S McGinley; R J Wirth; Roger Cady; Richard B Lipton
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2020-10-20       Impact factor: 4.147

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.