Literature DB >> 21534682

Generalized full-information item bifactor analysis.

Li Cai1, Ji Seung Yang, Mark Hansen.   

Abstract

Full-information item bifactor analysis is an important statistical method in psychological and educational measurement. Current methods are limited to single-group analysis and inflexible in the types of item response models supported. We propose a flexible multiple-group item bifactor analysis framework that supports a variety of multidimensional item response theory models for an arbitrary mixing of dichotomous, ordinal, and nominal items. The extended item bifactor model also enables the estimation of latent variable means and variances when data from more than 1 group are present. Generalized user-defined parameter restrictions are permitted within or across groups. We derive an efficient full-information maximum marginal likelihood estimator. Our estimation method achieves substantial computational savings by extending Gibbons and Hedeker's (1992) bifactor dimension reduction method so that the optimization of the marginal log-likelihood requires only 2-dimensional integration regardless of the dimensionality of the latent variables. We use simulation studies to demonstrate the flexibility and accuracy of the proposed methods. We apply the model to study cross-country differences, including differential item functioning, using data from a large international education survey on mathematics literacy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21534682      PMCID: PMC3150629          DOI: 10.1037/a0023350

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychol Methods        ISSN: 1082-989X


  9 in total

1.  How many IRT parameters does it take to model psychopathology items?

Authors:  Steven P Reise; Niels G Waller
Journal:  Psychol Methods       Date:  2003-06

2.  Limited-information goodness-of-fit testing of item response theory models for sparse 2 tables.

Authors:  Li Cai; Albert Maydeu-Olivares; Donna L Coffman; David Thissen
Journal:  Br J Math Stat Psychol       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 3.380

3.  Item factor analysis: current approaches and future directions.

Authors:  R J Wirth; Michael C Edwards
Journal:  Psychol Methods       Date:  2007-03

4.  Methodological issues for building item banks and computerized adaptive scales.

Authors:  David Thissen; Bryce B Reeve; Jakob Bue Bjorner; Chih-Hung Chang
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2007-02-10       Impact factor: 4.147

5.  SEM of another flavour: two new applications of the supplemented EM algorithm.

Authors:  Li Cai
Journal:  Br J Math Stat Psychol       Date:  2007-10-29       Impact factor: 3.380

6.  The role of the bifactor model in resolving dimensionality issues in health outcomes measures.

Authors:  Steven P Reise; Julien Morizot; Ron D Hays
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2007-05-04       Impact factor: 4.147

7.  Parsing the general and specific components of depression and anxiety with bifactor modeling.

Authors:  Leonard J Simms; Daniel F Grös; David Watson; Michael W O'Hara
Journal:  Depress Anxiety       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 6.505

8.  Using computerized adaptive testing to reduce the burden of mental health assessment.

Authors:  Robert D Gibbons; David J Weiss; David J Kupfer; Ellen Frank; Andrea Fagiolini; Victoria J Grochocinski; Dulal K Bhaumik; Angela Stover; R Darrell Bock; Jason C Immekus
Journal:  Psychiatr Serv       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 3.084

9.  Latent Class Models for Diary Method Data: Parameter Estimation by Local Computations.

Authors:  Frank Rijmen; Kristof Vansteelandt; Paul De Boeck
Journal:  Psychometrika       Date:  2007-10-04       Impact factor: 2.500

  9 in total
  41 in total

1.  Limited-information goodness-of-fit testing of hierarchical item factor models.

Authors:  Li Cai; Mark Hansen
Journal:  Br J Math Stat Psychol       Date:  2012-05-29       Impact factor: 3.380

2.  Comparing Surface and Underlying Local Dependence Levels via Polychoric Correlations.

Authors:  Carrie R Houts; Michael C Edwards
Journal:  Appl Psychol Meas       Date:  2014-12-11

3.  Best Design for Multidimensional Computerized Adaptive Testing With the Bifactor Model.

Authors:  Dong Gi Seo; David J Weiss
Journal:  Educ Psychol Meas       Date:  2015-03-25       Impact factor: 2.821

4.  Reliability and validity of PROMIS measures administered by telephone interview in a longitudinal localized prostate cancer study.

Authors:  Caroleen W Quach; Michelle M Langer; Ronald C Chen; David Thissen; Deborah S Usinger; Marc A Emerson; Bryce B Reeve
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2016-05-30       Impact factor: 4.147

5.  Development of the PROMIS positive emotional and sensory expectancies of smoking item banks.

Authors:  Joan S Tucker; William G Shadel; Maria Orlando Edelen; Brian D Stucky; Zhen Li; Mark Hansen; Li Cai
Journal:  Nicotine Tob Res       Date:  2014-09       Impact factor: 4.244

6.  The PROMIS smoking assessment toolkit--background and introduction to supplement.

Authors:  Maria Orlando Edelen
Journal:  Nicotine Tob Res       Date:  2014-09       Impact factor: 4.244

7.  Development of the PROMIS health expectancies of smoking item banks.

Authors:  Maria Orlando Edelen; Joan S Tucker; William G Shadel; Brian D Stucky; Jennifer Cerully; Zhen Li; Mark Hansen; Li Cai
Journal:  Nicotine Tob Res       Date:  2014-09       Impact factor: 4.244

8.  Invited Paper: The Rediscovery of Bifactor Measurement Models.

Authors:  Steven P Reise
Journal:  Multivariate Behav Res       Date:  2012-09-01       Impact factor: 5.923

9.  Maximum Marginal Likelihood Estimation of a Monotonic Polynomial Generalized Partial Credit Model with Applications to Multiple Group Analysis.

Authors:  Carl F Falk; Li Cai
Journal:  Psychometrika       Date:  2014-12-09       Impact factor: 2.500

10.  Psychometric properties of the PROMIS short form measures in a U.S. cohort of 961 patients with chronic hepatitis C prescribed direct acting antiviral therapy.

Authors:  D M Evon; J Amador; P Stewart; B B Reeve; A S Lok; R K Sterling; A M Di Bisceglie; N Reau; M Serper; S Sarkar; J K Lim; C E Golin; M W Fried
Journal:  Aliment Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2018-01-29       Impact factor: 8.171

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.