Literature DB >> 25232920

Does the length of specimen storage affect influenza testing results by real-time reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction? an analysis of influenza surveillance specimens, 2008 to 2010.

Dl Caselton1, G Arunga, G Emukule, P Muthoka, L Mayieka, A Kosgey, R Ochola, Lw Waiboci, Dr Feikin, Ja Mott, Rf Breiman, Ma Katz.   

Abstract

In some influenza surveillance systems, timely transport to laboratories for reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) testing is challenging.Guidelines suggest that samples can be stored at 4°Cfor up to 96 hours but the effect of longer storage times has not been systematically evaluated. We collected nasopharyngeal and oropharyngeal specimens from patients in Kenya and stored them in viral transport medium at 2 to 8°C before testing for influenza A and B using real-time RT-PCR. From April 2008 to November 2010, we collected 7,833 samples; 940 (12%) were positive for influenza. In multivariable analysis, specimens stored for six days were less likely to be influenza-positive compared to specimens stored between zero and one day (adjusted odds ratio (a OR): 0.49, 95%confidence interval (CI): 0.27–0.93). There was no statistically significant difference in influenza positivity of specimens stored for five days compared to zero to one day. There was no statistically significant relationship between days in refrigeration and cycle threshold(Ct) values for positive samples (p=0.31). We found that samples could remain in storage for at least five days without affecting the proportion-positive of samples,potentially increasing the feasibility of including influenza surveillance sites in remote areas.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25232920     DOI: 10.2807/1560-7917.es2014.19.36.20893

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Euro Surveill        ISSN: 1025-496X


  4 in total

1.  Detection of influenza by real time RT-PCR is not affected by delays in respiratory specimen processing.

Authors:  Ryan Dare; Yuwei Zhu; John V Williams; Marie Griffin; H Keipp Talbot
Journal:  J Med Virol       Date:  2016-04-26       Impact factor: 2.327

2.  Comparison of Respiratory Specimen Collection Methods for Detection of Influenza Virus Infection by Reverse Transcription-PCR: a Literature Review.

Authors:  Sarah Spencer; Mark G Thompson; Brendan Flannery; Alicia Fry
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2019-08-26       Impact factor: 5.948

3.  Evaluation of the point-of-care Becton Dickinson Veritor™ Rapid influenza diagnostic test in Kenya, 2013-2014.

Authors:  Linus K Ndegwa; Gideon Emukule; Timothy M Uyeki; Eunice Mailu; Sandra S Chaves; Marc-Alain Widdowson; Bandika V Lewa; Francis K Muiruri; Peter Omoth; Barry Fields; Joshua A Mott
Journal:  BMC Infect Dis       Date:  2017-01-11       Impact factor: 3.090

4.  An evaluation of the Zambia influenza sentinel surveillance system, 2011-2017.

Authors:  Paul Simusika; Stefano Tempia; Edward Chentulo; Lauren Polansky; Mazyanga Lucy Mazaba; Idah Ndumba; Quinn K Mbewe; Mwaka Monze
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2020-01-13       Impact factor: 2.655

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.