| Literature DB >> 25232481 |
Patrick Freyhardt1, Lilian Heckmann1, Alexander Beck1, Nicola Stolzenburg1, Jörg Schnorr1, Julia Kamp1, Jan L Rinnenthal2, Bernd Hamm1, Rolf W Günther1, Florian Streitparth1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Renal sympathetic denervation has recently gained clinical relevance for the treatment of therapy-resistant hypertension. Denervation is currently mainly performed using catheter-based transarterial radiofrequency ablation of periarterial sympathetic nerve fibers. Since this approach has numerous limitations, we conducted a study to evaluate the feasibility, safety, and efficacy of magnetic resonance-guided high-focused ultrasound (MRgHiFUS) for renal sympathetic denervation in pigs as an alternative to catheter-based ablation.Entities:
Keywords: Hypertension; MRgHiFUS sympathicolysis; Renal sympathetic denervation
Year: 2014 PMID: 25232481 PMCID: PMC4160576 DOI: 10.1186/2050-5736-2-12
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Ther Ultrasound ISSN: 2050-5736
MRI protocol for MRgHiFUS for renal sympathetic denervation
| Preprocedural planning | T2-w FSE: axial, sagittal, coronal |
| TR/TE 2,700/102 ms, ETL 20, bandwidth 15.6 kHz, FOV 36 cm, matrix 256 × 256, NEX 1.5, SL 4 mm | |
| MRI temperature monitoring | Phase imaging with the use of a FSGRE sequence, TR/TE 26.4/13.1 ms, flip angle 30°, bandwidth 5.7 kHz, matrix 256 × 128, FOV 36 cm, SL 3–5 mm |
| Postinterventional control | Fat-saturated T2-w FSE TR/TE 2,700/101 ms, ETL 20, bandwidth 15.6 kHz, FOV 36 cm, matrix 256 × 256, NEX 1.5, SL 4 mm |
| MR angiography | T1-w contrast-enhanced MR angiography FGRE 3D, TR/TE 3.45/1.2 ms, SL 1 mm, imaging frequency 63.8 kHz, pixel bandwidth 420, FOV 36 cm, matrix 384 × 376, flip angle 25° |
TR repetition time, TE echo time, ETL echo train length, FOV field of view, NEX number of excitations, SL slice thickness, FSGRE fast spoiled gradient-recalled echo.
Figure 1Sonication planning image. The sonication area lies within the blue-green bar, which includes the renal artery and the surrounding periarterial tissue.
Details of the test and therapeutic sonications in pig nos. 1–9 (mean values ± standard deviation)
| Pig1 | 3 | 26.3 | 525.3 | 20 | 17 | 4.1 | 15 | 100.4 | 2,291.3 | 22 | 17 | 4.1 |
| Pig 2 | 5 | 25.8 | 514.8 | 20 | 17 | 4.1 | 10 | 141.7 | 3,208 | 22.8 | 28.2 | 6.6 |
| Pig 3 | 2 | 39 | 465 | 12 | 24 | 4.9 | 8 | 146.6 | 1,759.8 | 12 | 25.1 | 4.8 |
| Pig 4 | 2 | 33 | 319 | 12 | 24 | 5.6 | 12 | 136.8 | 2,355.5 | 17.2 | 27.8 | 5.8 |
| Pig 5 | 2 | 30 | 599.5 | 20 | 26 | 6.4 | 7 | 165.6 | 3,309.3 | 20 | 28.9 | 7.2 |
| Pig 6 | 1 | 27 | 542 | 20 | 26 | 6.4 | 7 | 141.6 | 2,827.1 | 20 | 26.9 | 6.6 |
| Pig 7 | 2 | 25.5 | 507.5 | 20 | 26 | 6.4 | 9 | 103.3 | 2,578.8 | 25 | 23.8 | 6.4 |
| Pig 8 | 2 | 30.5 | 614.5 | 20 | 27 | 6.4 | 9 | 113.3 | 2,755 | 23.9 | 27.5 | 6.2 |
| Pig 9 | 3 | 23 | 463.3 | 20 | 27 | 6.4 | 11 | 147.2 | 2,947.3 | 20 | 27.1 | 6.7 |
| Mean | 2.4 | 28.9 | 505.7 | 18.2 | 23.8 | 5.6 | 9.8 | 132.9 | 2,670.2 | 20.3 | 25.8 | 6.0 |
| SD | 1.1 | 4.9 | 4.9 | 3.5 | 4.0 | 1.0 | 2.6 | 22.2 | 485.5 | 3.9 | 3.7 | 1.0 |
Overview of results with regard to MR signal intensity, histology, norepinephrine concentrations, and blood pressure
| Pig 1 | | X | | | 396.2 | -27.9 | 145/46 | X | ||
| Pig 2 | | X | | | 577.1 | -14 | 119/52 | X | ||
| Pig 3 | | X | | | 478.7 | 433.1 | 10 | 122/48 | 93/46 | |
| Pig 4 | | X | X | X | 509 | -12.5 | 139/84 | 135/83 | ||
| Pig 5 | | X | | | 346.1 | -8.2 | 118/55 | 118/49 | ||
| Pig 6 | | X | X | | 359.7 | -14 | 145/39 | 130/48 | ||
| Pig 7 | | X | X | | 429.5 | -38 | 117/39 | 111/34 | ||
| Pig 8 | | X | | | 348.9 | 270.5 | 29 | 112/62 | 122/52 | |
| Pig 9 | | X | | | 658.5 | -12.6 | 75/24 | 123/50 | ||
| Pig 10 | X | | | | 494.4 | 295.8 | 67.1 | 102/54 | 85/29 | |
| Mean | 391.7 | 442.2 | | 124/51 | 146/66 | 124/54 | ||||
| Pigs 1–9 | (±109.5) | (±121.1) | ||||||||
| Mean | 402 | 427.6 | 122/52 | 140/62 | 124/53 | |||||
| Pigs 1–10 | (±108.3) | (±123.2) | ||||||||
aLLOQ 20 ng/g tissue. Pig nos. 1 and 2 were sacrificed 2 h after the intervention to assess immediate effects on vessels and perivascular tissues. The other eight pigs were euthanized after 4 weeks. T2 signal intensity increase, histological changes, NE levels of the treated right (italicized) and untreated left kidneys (ng/g) at 4 weeks, and blood pressure values (systolic/diastolic in mmHg) before and after the intervention is given. All treated pigs developed edema in the tissue adjacent to the transverse process. Edema in the periarterial tissue was found in three pigs and corresponding histological changes in one pig. NE was lower on the treated side in seven pigs (italicized). Two pigs and the sham-treated pig had higher NE levels on the treated side. Average systolic and diastolic blood pressure 4 weeks after the intervention did not differ significantly from baseline.
Figure 2T2-w FSE images before and after the intervention (pigs 5 and 4). (a, b) T2-w FSE images before and after the intervention (pig 5). Postinterventional T2-w images show a signal increase within the paravertebral muscle adjacent to the transverse process (blue arrows). No signal increase is seen in the region of the perivascular tissue (white arrow). (c, d) T2-w FSE images before and after the intervention (pig 4). Postinterventional T2-w images show a signal intensity increase adjacent to the transverse process (blue arrows) and in the periarterial tissue (white arrows).
Figure 3Magnified view of a degenerated sympathetic nerve fiber (pig 4). Degeneration is indicated by a thickened perineurium (black arrow) as a correlate of fibrotic remodeling (Elastica van Gieson stain).
Figure 4Real-time temperature map with color-coded visualization of different tissue temperatures ( : low temperature/ : high temperature). The temperature map image shows focal heating (white arrow) in the dorsal periarterial space, possibly corresponding to energy absorption at a longish structure of thickened tissue consistent with an adjacent fascia. The bar indicated the region of sonciation.