Literature DB >> 25232461

Role of endoscopic ultrasound in the diagnosis of pancreatic cancer.

Juana Gonzalo-Marin1, Juan Jose Vila1, Manuel Perez-Miranda1.   

Abstract

Endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) with or without fine needle aspiration has become the main technique for evaluating pancreatobiliary disorders and has proved to have a higher diagnostic yield than positron emission tomography, computed tomography (CT) and transabdominal ultrasound for recognising early pancreatic tumors. As a diagnostic modality for pancreatic cancer, EUS has proved rates higher than 90%, especially for lesions less than 2-3 cm in size in which it reaches a sensitivity rate of 99% vs 55% for CT. Besides, EUS has a very high negative predictive value and thus EUS can reliably exclude pancreatic cancer. The complication rate of EUS is as low as 1.1%-3.0%. New technical developments such as elastography and the use of contrast agents have recently been applied to EUS, improving its diagnostic capability. EUS has been found to be superior to the recent multidetector CT for T staging with less risk of overstaying in comparison to both CT and magnetic resonance imaging, so that patients are not being ruled out of a potentially beneficial resection. The accuracy for N staging with EUS is 64%-82%. In unresectable cancers, EUS also plays a therapeutic role by means of treating oncological pain through celiac plexus block, biliary drainage in obstructive jaundice in patients where endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography is not affordable and aiding radiotherapy and chemotherapy.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Diagnosis; Endoscopy; Endosonography; Neoplasm Staging; Pancreatic neoplasms; Therapeutics

Year:  2014        PMID: 25232461      PMCID: PMC4163734          DOI: 10.4251/wjgo.v6.i9.360

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Gastrointest Oncol


  104 in total

1.  A first report of tumor seeding because of EUS-guided FNA of a pancreatic adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Sarto C Paquin; Gilles Gariépy; Luigi Lepanto; Raymond Bourdages; Ginette Raymond; Anand V Sahai
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 9.427

2.  EUS-guided celiac block and neurolysis.

Authors:  D Collins; I Penman; G Mishra; P Draganov
Journal:  Endoscopy       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 10.093

3.  Radial scanning and linear array endosonography for staging pancreatic cancer: a prospective randomized comparison.

Authors:  F Gress; T Savides; O Cummings; S Sherman; G Lehman; S Zaidi; R Hawes
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  1997-02       Impact factor: 9.427

4.  Influence of on-site cytopathology evaluation on the diagnostic accuracy of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) of solid pancreatic masses.

Authors:  Julio Iglesias-Garcia; J Enrique Dominguez-Munoz; Ihab Abdulkader; Jose Larino-Noia; Elena Eugenyeva; Antonio Lozano-Leon; Jeronimo Forteza-Vila
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2011-04-12       Impact factor: 10.864

Review 5.  Celiac plexus block for pancreatic cancer pain in adults.

Authors:  Paolo G Arcidiacono; Giliola Calori; Silvia Carrara; Ewan D McNicol; Pier A Testoni
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2011-03-16

6.  Randomized, double-blind, controlled trial of early endoscopic ultrasound-guided celiac plexus neurolysis to prevent pain progression in patients with newly diagnosed, painful, inoperable pancreatic cancer.

Authors:  Jonathan M Wyse; Marco Carone; Sarto C Paquin; Mariana Usatii; Anand V Sahai
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2011-08-15       Impact factor: 44.544

7.  Contrast-enhanced endoscopic ultrasound in discrimination between focal pancreatitis and pancreatic cancer.

Authors:  Michael Hocke; Ewald Schulze; Peter Gottschalk; Theodor Topalidis; Christoph F Dietrich
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2006-01-14       Impact factor: 5.742

8.  Comparison between multislice CT and MR imaging in the diagnostic evaluation of patients with pancreatic masses.

Authors:  M Fusari; S Maurea; M Imbriaco; C Mollica; G Avitabile; F Soscia; L Camera; M Salvatore
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2010-01-15       Impact factor: 3.469

Review 9.  Preoperative tissue diagnosis for tumours of the pancreas.

Authors:  W Hartwig; L Schneider; M K Diener; F Bergmann; M W Büchler; J Werner
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 6.939

10.  Comparison of endoscopic ultrasonography and multidetector computed tomography for detecting and staging pancreatic cancer.

Authors:  John DeWitt; Benedict Devereaux; Melissa Chriswell; Kathleen McGreevy; Thomas Howard; Thomas F Imperiale; Donato Ciaccia; Kathleen A Lane; Dean Maglinte; Kenyon Kopecky; Julia LeBlanc; Lee McHenry; James Madura; Alex Aisen; Harvey Cramer; Oscar Cummings; Stuart Sherman
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2004-11-16       Impact factor: 25.391

View more
  16 in total

Review 1.  Review of current and evolving clinical indications for endoscopic ultrasound.

Authors:  Anjuli K Luthra; John A Evans
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2016-02-10

Review 2.  The role of artificial intelligence in pancreatic surgery: a systematic review.

Authors:  D Schlanger; F Graur; C Popa; E Moiș; N Al Hajjar
Journal:  Updates Surg       Date:  2022-03-02

3.  Endoscopic Ultrasonography is a Promising Tool for Preoperative Prediction of the Operability of Pancreatic Carcinoma.

Authors:  Tarek Ezzat Abdellatif; Khaled Safwat; Hazem Hakim Elmenshawy; Wael Abdalla; Sameh Mohamed Naguib
Journal:  J Gastrointest Cancer       Date:  2021-01-07

4.  Interobserver agreement among cytopathologists in the evaluation of pancreatic endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration cytology specimens.

Authors:  Rawad Mounzer; Roy Yen; Carrie Marshall; Sharon Sams; Sanjana Mehrotra; Mohamed Sherif Said; Joshua C Obuch; Brian Brauer; Augustin Attwell; Norio Fukami; Raj Shah; Stuart Amateau; Matthew Hall; Lindsay Hosford; Robert Wilson; Amit Rastogi; Sachin Wani
Journal:  Endosc Int Open       Date:  2016-06-21

Review 5.  Endoscopic ultrasound for staging of colonic cancer proximal to the rectum: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Marie Louise Malmstrøm; Adrian Săftoiu; Peter Vilmann; Tobias Wirenfeldt Klausen; Ismail Gögenur
Journal:  Endosc Ultrasound       Date:  2016 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 5.628

6.  Extramedullary plasmacytoma mimicking pancreatic cancer: A case report and literature review.

Authors:  Jae Hyung Kim; Woo Hyun Paik; Mee Joo; Jung Gon Kim; Jong Wook Kim; Won Ki Bae; Nam-Hoon Kim; Kyung-Ah Kim; June Sung Lee
Journal:  Endosc Ultrasound       Date:  2017 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 5.628

7.  The effect of solid pancreatic mass lesions on pancreatic duct diameter at endoscopic ultrasound.

Authors:  Anand C Baxi; Qingwei Jiang; Jinghua Hao; Zhuo Yang; Kevin Woods; Steven Keilin; Field F Willingham; Qiang Cai
Journal:  Endosc Ultrasound       Date:  2017 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 5.628

8.  Determination of optimal ultrasound planes for the initialisation of image registration during endoscopic ultrasound-guided procedures.

Authors:  Ester Bonmati; Yipeng Hu; Eli Gibson; Laura Uribarri; Geri Keane; Kurinchi Gurusami; Brian Davidson; Stephen P Pereira; Matthew J Clarkson; Dean C Barratt
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2018-04-16       Impact factor: 2.924

9.  The efficacy of rapid on-site evaluation during endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration of pancreatic masses.

Authors:  Abhinav Koul; Anand C Baxi; Ruilian Shang; Xianmei Meng; Lianyong Li; Steven A Keilin; Field F Willingham; Qiang Cai
Journal:  Gastroenterol Rep (Oxf)       Date:  2017-04-24

10.  Quantitative analysis of endobronchial ultrasound elastography in computed tomography-negative mediastinal and hilar lymph nodes.

Authors:  Keigo Uchimura; Kei Yamasaki; Shinji Sasada; Sachika Hara; Issei Ikushima; Yosuke Chiba; Takashi Tachiwada; Toshinori Kawanami; Kazuhiro Yatera
Journal:  Thorac Cancer       Date:  2020-07-21       Impact factor: 3.500

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.