K Oka1, C E Mullins2, R S Kushwaha3, A M Leen2, L Chan1. 1. 1] Department of Molecular and Cellular Biology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA [2] Department of Medicine, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA. 2. Department of Pediatrics, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA. 3. Texas Biomedical Research Institute, San Antonio, TX, USA.
Abstract
Autosomal dominant familial hypercholesterolemia (FH) is a monogenic life-threatening disease. We tested the efficacy of low-density lipoprotein receptor (LDLR) gene therapy using helper-dependent adenoviral vector (HDAd) in a nonhuman primate model of FH, comparing intravenous injection versus intrahepatic arterial injection in the presence of balloon catheter-based hepatic venous occlusion. Rhesus monkeys heterozygous for mutant LDLR gene (LDLR+/-) developed hypercholesterolemia while on a high-cholesterol diet. We treated them with HDAd-LDLR either by intravenous delivery or by catheter-based intrahepatic artery injection. Intravenous injection of ⩽1.1 × 10(12) viral particles (vp) kg(-1) failed to have any effect on plasma cholesterol. Increasing the dose to 5 × 10(12) vp kg(-1) led to a 59% lowering of the plasma cholesterol that lasted for 30 days before it returned to pre-treatment levels by day 40. A further increase in dose to 8.4 × 10(12) vp kg(-1) resulted in severe lethal toxicity. In contrast, direct hepatic artery injection following catheter-based hepatic venous occlusion enabled the use of a reduced HDAd-LDLR dose of 1 × 10(12) vp kg(-1) that lowered plasma cholesterol within a week, and reached a nadir of 59% pre-treatment level on days 20-48 after injection. Serum alanine aminotransferase remained normal until day 48 when it went up slightly and stayed mildly elevated on day 72 before it returned to normal on day 90. In this monkey, the HDAd-LDLR-induced trough of hypocholesterolemia started trending upward on day 72 and returned to pre-treatment levels on day 120. We measured the LDL apolipoprotein B turnover rate at 10 days before, and again 79 days after, HDAd-LDLR treatment in two monkeys that exhibited a cholesterol-lowering response. HDAd-LDLR therapy increased the LDL fractional catabolic rate by 78 and 50% in the two monkeys, coincident with an increase in hepatic LDLR mRNA expression. In conclusion, HDAd-mediated LDLR gene delivery to the liver using a balloon catheter occlusion procedure is effective in reversing hypercholesterolemia in a nonhuman primate FH model; however, the unsustainability of the hypocholesterolemic response during 3-4 months of follow up and heterogeneous response to the treatment remains a challenge.
Autosomal dominant familial hypercholesterolemia (FH) is a monogenic life-threatening disease. We tested the efficacy of low-density lipoprotein receptor (LDLR) gene therapy using helper-dependent adenoviral vector (HDAd) in a nonhuman primate model of FH, comparing intravenous injection versus intrahepatic arterial injection in the presence of balloon catheter-based hepatic venous occlusion. Rhesus monkeys heterozygous for mutant LDLR gene (LDLR+/-) developed hypercholesterolemia while on a high-cholesterol diet. We treated them with HDAd-LDLR either by intravenous delivery or by catheter-based intrahepatic artery injection. Intravenous injection of ⩽1.1 × 10(12) viral particles (vp) kg(-1) failed to have any effect on plasma cholesterol. Increasing the dose to 5 × 10(12) vp kg(-1) led to a 59% lowering of the plasma cholesterol that lasted for 30 days before it returned to pre-treatment levels by day 40. A further increase in dose to 8.4 × 10(12) vp kg(-1) resulted in severe lethal toxicity. In contrast, direct hepatic artery injection following catheter-based hepatic venous occlusion enabled the use of a reduced HDAd-LDLR dose of 1 × 10(12) vp kg(-1) that lowered plasma cholesterol within a week, and reached a nadir of 59% pre-treatment level on days 20-48 after injection. Serum alanine aminotransferase remained normal until day 48 when it went up slightly and stayed mildly elevated on day 72 before it returned to normal on day 90. In this monkey, the HDAd-LDLR-induced trough of hypocholesterolemia started trending upward on day 72 and returned to pre-treatment levels on day 120. We measured the LDL apolipoprotein B turnover rate at 10 days before, and again 79 days after, HDAd-LDLR treatment in two monkeys that exhibited a cholesterol-lowering response. HDAd-LDLR therapy increased the LDL fractional catabolic rate by 78 and 50% in the two monkeys, coincident with an increase in hepatic LDLR mRNA expression. In conclusion, HDAd-mediated LDLR gene delivery to the liver using a balloon catheter occlusion procedure is effective in reversing hypercholesterolemia in a nonhuman primate FH model; however, the unsustainability of the hypocholesterolemic response during 3-4 months of follow up and heterogeneous response to the treatment remains a challenge.
Autosomal dominant familial hypercholesterolemia (FH) is caused by mutations in the
low-density lipoprotein receptor (LDLR).[1]
Homozygous FHpatients present with massively elevated LDL cholesterol and cardiovascular
disease. They have severe atherosclerosis and die of ischemic heart disease usually in their
third decade of life. The majority of homozygous and a substantial proportion of
heterozygous patients are refractory to conventional pharmacological therapy. Therapeutic
options for these resistant patients are limited to LDL apheresis, portacaval anastomosis,
or liver transplantation.[2] Gene therapy has
been explored as an alternative treatment. The liver is the main target organ for FH gene
therapy because of its capacity to dispose of excess cholesterol by diverting it into bile
acids; it is also accessible to gene delivery via the intravenous (i.v.) route or the
hepatic artery. A number of studies have shown that hepatic reconstitution of LDLR
expression ex vivo can reverse hypercholesterolemia, including promising
results in a rabbit model of FH.[3] In the
only clinical gene therapy trial for FH to date, Grossman et al. isolated
hepatocytes from FHpatients, transduced them ex vivo with retroviral
vector expressing LDLR, and reimplanted them into the liver of the patients.[4,5] Only
marginal therapeutic benefit was achieved in this study. It was difficult to determine
whether the reduction of LDL cholesterol level was the direct result of the gene transfer or
other factors were involved. Plasma LDL level is determined by LDL production and removal.
For example, the decline of LDL cholesterol after portacaval anastomosis is caused by a
decreased secretion of very-low-density lipoprotein (VLDL), a precursor of LDL, not by an
enhanced LDL removal.[6] In this clinical
trial, LDL turnover was not measured, which led to the comment, “a modest
17% fall in plasma cholesterol after 25% hepatectomy and re-infusion of
hepatocytes infected with a retrovirus might have been due to either diminished lipoprotein
production or to enhanced activity of the patient’s own receptor”.[7] The focus has shifted to in vivo gene therapy
thereafter. Helper-dependent adenoviral vector (HDAd) is devoid of all viral protein genes
and has shown considerable promise for liver-directed gene transfer with long-term transgene
expression, which lasted a life-time in mice.[8] In a previous study in LDLR−/− mice, we showed
that a single injection of HDAd expressing monkey LDLR reduced plasma cholesterol over 2
years and attenuated atherosclerotic lesion progression.[9] We also demonstrated that LDLR gene therapy induces the regression of
established atherosclerosis in LDLR−/− mice.[10] Despite promising results of gene therapy in small
animal models, its efficacy in large animal models has not been tested; there are important
differences in physiology and in immune responses between rodents and humans. This issue is
particularly relevant in gene therapy for lipid disorders.[11]A nonhuman primate model of FH has been described in rhesus monkeys,[12,13]
which carried a heterozygous nonsense mutation involving codon Trp283[14] of the LDLR. Extensive cross-breeding of the affected
monkeys failed to yield any homozygotes, indicating that the mutation may be linked to a
lethal mutation. With the availability only of the heterozygous (LDLR+/−)
rhesus monkey, we will be modeling heterozygous FH in humans, a relatively common genetic
disorder that affects about 1 in 500 people in most ethnic groups.[15] Heterozygous LDLR-deficient monkeys displayed elevated
plasma cholesterol (5.17–6.47 mmol/l or 200–250 mg/dl) compared with
unaffected monkeys (2.59–3.36 mmol/l or 100–130 mg/dl); the plasma
cholesterol level further increased to 12.93–20.69 mmol/l (500–800 mg/dl)
when the animals were fed a high-cholesterol diet.[16] In this study, we tested the efficacy of HDAd-based monkey LDLR gene
therapy in high cholesterol diet-fed LDLR+/− rhesus monkeys. We compared the
effect of intravenous (i.v.) injection of HDAd-LDLR to that of a balloon catheter-based
procedure developed by Brunetti-Pierri et al.[17] We found that a single i.v. injection of HDAd-LDLR into
LDLR+/− monkeys produced a >50% lowering of plasma cholesterol
that lasted about a month. We next tested a modified percutaneous catheter-based gene
delivery strategy also developed by Brunetti-Pierri et al.[18] In this refinement, the HDAd-LDLR was injected directly
into the hepatic artery in the presence of increased intrahepatic pressure induced by
transient blockage of hepatic venous drainage by a balloon catheter positioned in the
inferior vena cava (IVC). The optimized gene delivery strategy was highly efficacious in
reducing the vector dose while substantially prolonging the therapeutic hypocholesterolemic
response to the treatment regimen.
Results
Intravenous Injection of HDAd-LDLR
We treated four LDLR+/− monkeys as study subjects with a single
i.v. injection of escalating doses of HDAd-LDLR.[9] We first treated monkey #8796 with 20 ml of saline and found
no significant changes in plasma cholesterol levels after treatment (Figure 1). As expected, we also failed to detect any change in
plasma cholesterol when we treated another LDLR+/− monkey #9908
with an empty vector HDAd-0 [0.8×1012 viral particles
(vp)/kg]. We next injected i.v. HDAd-LDLR into a third LDLR+/−
monkey #7139 at a dose of 1.1×1012 vp/kg, an HDAd dose that is
10-fold higher than the dose of HDAd-α-fetoprotein that stimulated significant
elevation in α-fetoprotein secretion in serum in baboons[17] and again failed to observe any change in plasma
cholesterol level in monkey #7139. We then treated a fourth monkey #13090
at an even higher i.v. dose of 5×1012 vp/kg of HDAd-LDLR. The treatment
was well-tolerated by the monkey and led to a 60% reduction of plasma cholesterol
from a baseline of 14.95 mmol/l (578 mg/dl) to 5.90 mmol/l (229 mg/dl) on day 7. The
plasma cholesterol lowering persisted until day 21, when it went up to 10.70 mmol/l (413
mg/dl)] on day 28, and towards pretreatment levels on day 42. These results
indicate that a dose higher than 1.1×1012 vp/kg was needed to reverse
hypercholesterolemia in LDLR+/− monkeys, and a dose of
5×1012 vp/kg significantly restored normal plasma cholesterol in a
heterozygous FH monkey, an effect that lasted for about a month. We next treated a fifth
monkey #11226 with an even higher dose of 8.4×1012 vp/kg, which
was modestly below a dose that had previously proven to be lethal[19] and observed severe acute toxicity and lethality
within a day of treatment. The clinical picture and necropsy revealed hemorrhagic shock
syndrome likely resulting from the high dose of HDAd vector used.
Figure 1
Efficacy of intravenous injection of HDAd expressing monkey LDLR in heterozygous
LDLR-deficient rhesus monkeys
Four heterozygous LDLR-deficient monkeys were treated with a single intravenous injection
of saline (#8796), empty vector at a dose of 0.8×1012 vp/kg
(#9908), or HDAd-LDLR at a dose of 1.1×1012 vp/kg
(#7139) or 5×1012 vp/kg (#13090). Baseline cholesterol
levels were 18.0 mmol/l (696 mg/dl) in monkey #8796, 9.5 mmol/l (368 mg/dl) in
monkey #9908, 8.0 mmol/l (308 mg/dl) in monkey #7139 and 15.0 mmol/l (578
mg/dl) in monkey #13090, respectively. The broken line shows pretreatment
cholesterol levels.
Balloon Occlusion-Based HDAd Delivery into Hepatic Artery
To improve upon i.v. vector injection as a delivery method, Brunetti-Perri et al
developed a protocol[17,18] to deliver the vector via an intrahepatic arterial
catheter. Simultaneously, under fluoroscopic guidance, they inserted a balloon catheter
into the inferior vena cava (IVC) via the femoral vein and positioned it over the hepatic
venous outflow (Figure 2a). Intrahepatic arterial
HDAd injection when the balloon was inflated led a10-fold increase efficiency in transgene
expression (Figure 2b and c). The IVC occlusion was
also monitored by the venous pressure (Figure. 2d).
We performed the same procedure in rhesus monkeys and injected the HDAd vector (2 ml)
within a minute via a hepatic artery catheter immediately after the balloon was
inflated.
Figure 2
Balloon catheter-based hepatic artery injection
(a). Schematic diagram of hepatic artery injection. The liver circulation is
isolated by inserting a balloon catheter via the femoral vein and placing it in the
inferior vena cava (IVC). A second IV catheter is inserted into the hepatic artery through
the contralateral femoral artery. The placement of the catheter is visualized using
fluoroscopy. Once occlusion of the hepatic circulation has been established via the
balloon catheter in the IVC, the vector is injected via the arterial catheter. The
occlusion is confirmed by monitoring hepatic venous pressure through the third catheter
inserted into the femoral vein. BD: bile duct; HA: hepatic artery; HV: hepatic vein; PV:
portal vein. (b) Fluoroscopy image to confirm the position of a
balloon-catheter. (c) Fluoroscopy after the balloon inflated. Contrast
reagent was injected to confirm that the catheter was placed at the IVC. (d)
Venous pressure. Occlusion was monitored by venous pressure.
The monkeys used for this procedure are summarized in Table 1. We first performed the procedure in a chow-fed (Purina
LabDiet5LEO, St. Louis, MO) normal LDLR+/+ (#19254) and a
heterozygous LDLR+/− (#19499) monkey. The injection was done
immediately after the balloon was deflated but while hepatic venous pressure remained
high. As reported previously[17,18], systemic blood pressure fell significantly when the
balloon was inflated. We found that serum IL-6 level increased 30 minutes after injection
and peaked at 2 hours (Figure 3a) but decreased to
non-detectable levels by 72 hours. The procedure also led to transient and inconsistent
changes in plasma liver enzymes (Figure 3b and c).
Alanine aminotransferase (ALT) and aspartate aminotransferase (AST) levels peaked at about
24 hours; the increase was mild and resolved by day 5. Plasma total cholesterol levels in
the LDLR+/− (#19499) monkey decreased from a baseline of 5.70
mmol/l (219 mg/dl) to 3.90 mmol/l (150 mg/dl) within 24 hours. It gradually went back up
over the next few days returning to baseline by day 5. The plasma cholesterol level did
not change in the non-FH (LDLR+/+) (#19254) monkey (Figure 3d).
Table 1
Summary of rhesus monkeys used for balloon-catheter occlusion
ID
Sex
Age (Years)
Bodyweight (kg)
Genotype
Dose (VP/kg)
#19254
F
3
3.9
N
Saline
#19499*
M
3
3.4
H
Saline
#21588
F
2
2.6
N
2.0×1012
#19360
F
3
4.0
N
2.0×1012
#19251
F
3
4.2
H
2.0×1012
#19498
M
3
5.0
H
2.0×1012
#18340
M
5
5.7
H
Saline
#19269
F
4
5.0
H
1×1012
#19255
M
4
5.7
H
Saline
#19536
F
4
4.4
H
0.3×1012
#20031*
F
3
3.4
N
N: normal; H: heterozygous LDLR-deficient.
Monkeys were used as donors for LDL turnover study.
Figure 3
Acute toxicity measurements associated with balloon catheter based hepatic artery
injection
One normal LDLR+/+ (#19254) and one heterozygous
LDLR+/− (#19499) monkeys on normal chow were treated by an
injection of saline after and a complete blood test and IL-6 measurement were performed.
(a) Plasma IL-6 levels. (b) Serum alanine aminotransferase
(ALT) levels. (c) Serum aspartate aminotransferase (AST) levels.
(d) Plasma cholesterol levels.
We next fed monkeys with a Rhesus Western diet (Texas Biomedical Research
Institute, San Antonio, TX) for 7 weeks prior to treatment and were kept on the diet
afterwards. We injected HDAd-LDLR (2×1012 vp/kg) into 4 monkeys
immediately after the balloon was deflated. The plasma cholesterol did not change in two
wild-type LDLR+/+ monkeys (#19360, and #21588) suggesting
that the gene delivery does not have an effect on the cholesterol dynamics in monkeys that
express normal amounts of LDLR. Of the two heterozygous LDLR+/− monkeys,
one (#19251) showed no change in plasma cholesterol (Figure 4A, green line), whereas another LDLR+/− monkey
(#19498) exhibited a 57% drop in plasma cholesterol level from 8.15 mmol/l
(315 mg/dl) to 3.25 mmol/l (126 mg/dl) at day 7 (Figure
4a, red line). So there was a heterogeneous response in heterozygous FH monkeys
treated at this dose of HDAd-LDLR. The cholesterol lowering effect of HDAd-LDLR in the
LDLR+/− (#19498) monkey that responded to the treatment was
sustained for about 100 days. The plasma lowering effect reached its nadir 7 days, and
stayed at or near the nadir for another three weeks. Afterwards, it gradually rose to 5.09
mmol/l (197 mg/dl) at day 78, and then to above the pretreatment level (9.30 mmol/l, or
361 mg/dl) by day 105 (Figure 4a, red line). The two
wild-type LDLR+/+ monkeys maintained normal serum ALT throughout the
observation period of 120 days. The LDLR+/− monkey (#19251) that
did not showed a hypocholesterolemic response also maintained normal ALT levels for 67
days, end of the observation period for this monkey. In contrast, the serum ALT of the
LDLR+/− monkey (#19498) that showed a hypocholesterolemic response
maintained a normal ALT level during the first 3 weeks of treatment when the plasma
cholesterol showed an excellent response (Figure 4a,
red line). The ALT began to edge above normal to 70 U/l on day 36, and continued to go up
to peak at 144 U/l on day 72, before it started trending down, eventually returning to
normal on day 120 (Figure 4b, red line). It is
noteworthy that this monkey that had responded to the treatment developed liver enzyme
elevation late, and the delayed increase in serum ALT coincided with the onset of loss of
the cholesterol lowering effect of the treatment. While the significance of the timing is
unclear, we note that a similar pattern is evident in an experiment involving another
LDLR+/− monkey (#19269, see below).
Figure 4
Plasma cholesterol level of rhesus monkeys after balloon-catheter based hepatic
artery delivery
HDAd-LDLR was injected into monkeys in a volume of 10 ml/kg at a dose of
2×1012 vp/kg. The vector was injected after the balloon was deflated.
#19360 and #21588 were normal LDLR+/+ monkeys and
#19251 and #19498 were heterozygous LDLR+/− monkeys.
(a) Changes in plasma cholesterol levels. Pretreatment plasma cholesterol
levels were 7.55 mmol/l (292 mg/dl) in #19360, 7.25 mmol/l (281 mg/dl) in
#21588, 10.30 mmol/l (399 mg/dl) in #19251 and 8.15 mmol/l (315 mg/dl) in
#19498, respectively. (b) Plasma ALT levels. Normal ALT range (5-61
IU/l) is shown by filled area. #19251 had a low hematocrit level at day 78 and
blood analyses were not performed. Because this animal did not show any effects of gene
therapy, further follow up was deemed unnecessary and #19251 was removed from the
study.
Optimized Balloon Occlusion Protocol Increases Efficacy of HDAd-LDLR Therapy
The HDAd-LDLR-mediated hypocholesterolemic response was encouraging in monkey
#19498. However, the dose used (2.2×1012 vp/kg) was only ~4
fold lower than a lethal dose (8.4×1012 vp/kg, lethal for monkey
#11226). In an attempt to increase the efficiency of HDAd-LDLR treatment so as to
obtain comparable results with a lower dose of HDAd, we decided to modify the protocol by
keeping the balloon inflated (and thus intrahepatic pressure maintained at a high level)
throughout the vector injection. We applied the modified protocol on
LDLR+/− monkey (#19269, fed a Rhesus Western diet)) at half the
dose used in the last group of monkeys, i.e., at 1 ×1012 vp/kg,
immediately after the balloon was inflated. The injection line was flushed with 20 mL of
saline and the IVC balloon was kept inflated for an additional 5 min before it was
deflated (Figure 2d). Despite the use of a lower
dose, the plasma cholesterol of this monkey (#19269) decreased from 10.40 mmol/l
(402 mg/dl) to 5.75 mmol/l (222 mg/dl) at day 7; at day 20, it decreased further to 4.30
mmol/l (165 mg/dl), constituting a 59% reduction from the pretreatment level. The
plasma cholesterol level stayed at the same level (4.30 mmol/l) until day 48 (Figure 5a), when ALT level went up modestly to 81 U/l and
stayed mildly elevated on day 72 (89 U/l) (Figure
5b). At day 72, plasma cholesterol level started trending upwards to 6.00 mmol/l
(232 mg/dl) and returned to the pretreatment level by day 120.
Figure 5
Plasma cholesterol and serum ALT levels in heterozygous LDLR-deficient monkey treated
by an optimal procedure
Monkey #19269 was treated with a single injection of HDAd-LDLR at a dose of
1×1012 vp/kg while the balloon was inflated. (a) Plasma
cholesterol level. Plasma cholesterol level was 10.40 mmol/l (402 mg/dl) before gene
transfer. (b) Serum ALT levels. Normal range (5-61 IU/l) is shown by filled
area.
Although intrahepatic delivery of HDAd-LDLR at a dose of
1×1012 vp/kg was effective in reversing hypercholesterolemia, the
beneficial effect of the treatment did not last beyond ~100 days. Contrary to the
transient nature (lasting up to 3–4 months only) of the cholesterol lowering
effect of HDAd-LDLR in LDLR+/− rhesus monkeys, wild-type baboons that had
been treated with a low dose (3×1010 vp/kg) HDAd-α-fetoprotein
vector were reported to exhibit a much more prolonged expression of
α-fetoprotein.[17] One
possible explanation is that there is heightened host immune responses to HDAd vector
because the dose we used in monkeys was 30 times higher than that in baboons.
Interestingly, observations similar to the current study have been reported in hemophilia
B patients treated with adeno-associated virus (AAV) expressing factor IX in which
transgene factor IX expression dropped precipitously at days 50–60 after
treatment, an effect attributed to preexisting immunity against AAV vector.[20] To examine the possibility of preexisting
memory T-cells against Ad by HDAd administration, we tested the effect of a dose of
0.3×1012 vp/kg, which is 10-fold higher than the effective dose
reported in baboons[17] but 3-fold lower
than the dose that induced the increase in ALT in our study. Two LDLR+/−
monkeys were treated with either 0.3×1012 vp/kg of vector
(#19536) or saline (#19255). HDAd administration at this dose did not
lower plasma cholesterol or increase liver enzymes (data not shown). We collected
peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) at days −21, +34 and
+70 and measured cytotoxic T-cell (CTL) activity as reflected by interferon-gamma
secretion by lymphocytes upon stimulation with Ad peptides.[21] There was no significant increase in CTL activity in
either monkey (Figure S1),
suggesting that hepatic arterial injection of HDAd at a dose of
0.3×1012 vp/kg did not stimulate preexisting memory T-cells. We also
measured neutralizing antibodies before and after vector injection. Plasma collected from
monkey #19522 treated with saline did not have any significant neutralizing
antibodies at any time of sampling, while plasma from monkey #19536 treated with
HDAd-LDLR inhibited the infection of 116 cells with HDAd-EGFP at 1:80 dilution at day
+34 and +70 but not at day −21.
Efficacy of LDLR gene therapy
In addition to evaluating the plasma cholesterol as the downstream response to
LDLR gene therapy, we also monitored the functional activity of the LDLR gene transfer 10
days before, and 79 days after, HDAd-mediated LDLR gene transfer. Hepatic LDLR gene
delivery in LDLR+/− monkeys, #19498 (Figure 4, red line) and #19269 (Figure
5), increased LDLR mRNA levels by 10- and 27-fold, respectively (Table 2, Figure 6). It
markedly lowered LDL cholesterol (by 47% and 67%, respectively, Table 2), and raised the LDL apoB Fractional Catabolic
Rate (FCR) in both monkeys by 78% and 50%, respectively, indicating that
the hypocholesterolemic response to the gene therapy was the result of markedly increased
LDLR activity in vivo (Table 2 and
Figure S2).
Table 2
Effects of gene therapy on plasma cholesterol and LDL metabolism.
#19498
Pre-treatment
Post-treatment
Plasma cholesterol (mmol/l)
7.60
4.75
LDL cholesterol (mmol/l)
5.90
3.10
HDL cholesterol (mmol/l)
1.75
1.75
Relative LDLR mRNA expression
1.37
14.32
LDL apoB FCR (pool/day)
0.230
0.410
LDL apoB production rate (mg/kg/day)
11.28
11.52
#19269
Plasma cholesterol (mmol/l)
9.60
4.50
LDL cholesterol (mmol/l)
6.80
2.25
HDL cholesterol (mmol/l)
2.75
2.30
Relative LDLR mRNA expression
0.47
12.64
LDL apoB FCR (pool/day)
0.276
0.415
LDL apoB production rate (mg/kg/day)
10.32
10.80
The pre-treatment studies were done 10 days before gene therapy and the post-treatment
studies were performed 79 days after gene transfer. Both were heterozygous
LDLR+/− monkeys. #19498 was injected by
2×1012 vp/kg HDAd-LDLR after balloon was deflated, whereas
#19269 was treated by 1×1012 vp/kg while balloon was
inflated.
Figure 6
Relative LDLR mRNA expression in rhesus monkeys treated with HDAd-LDLR
Monkey LDLR mRNA levels in needle biopsies of liver were quantified by TaqMan RT-PCR and
normalized to β-actin mRNA. The biopsy was performed 10 days before and 79 days
after HDAd-LDLR administration.
Discussion
FH is the most common and severe form of monogenic lipid disorder. Because of its
severity and limited availability of conventional therapeutic options, homozygous FH has
been an important candidate disease for gene therapy. We and others reported that in a mouse
model of homozygous FH, hepatic delivery of LDLR gene by i.v. HDAd or AAV inhibits
atherosclerotic lesion progression and may effect lesion regression.[9,10,22,23] Since a
nonhuman primate model of LDLR deficiency exists only in the heterozygous form, we used the
LDLR+/− monkeys a model to test the feasibility of LDLR gene therapy in
heterozygous FH, a much more common but serious disorder. Initially, we delivered the HDAd
via i.v. injection, a minimally invasive and preferred route of administration. However,
i.v. injection requires a high dose, approximately half the lethal dose in
baboons,[19] to be effective (Figure 1). At 5×1012 vp/kg, i.v.
HDAD-LDLR led to a 60% reduction of plasma cholesterol on day 7. However, the
hypocholesterolemic effect was short-lived and by day 42 plasma cholesterol level had
returned to pre-injection levels. A higher dose (8.4×1012 vp/kg) caused
severe acute toxicity, as reported in a baboon that received a similar lethal
dose.[19]In order to increase hepatic transduction efficiency and reduce dose-dependent
toxicity, Brunetti-Pierri et al. developed a catheter-based balloon occlusion method in
baboons.[17,18,24] We applied this approach to
our rhesus monkey model. We first tested the procedure by injecting saline into two monkeys
(one normal LDLR+/+ and one LDLR+/− monkey) to determine
their response to the procedure. The animals tolerated the procedure well. An acute increase
in IL-6 was found in a LDLR+/+ monkey as previously documented in
baboons[17] but not in a
LDLR+/− monkey, suggesting mild but variable responses of animals to the
procedure itself. We then treated two LDLR+/+ and two
LDLR+/− monkeys that had been fed a Rhesus Western (high cholesterol) diet
for 2.5 months. Only one monkey showed a therapeutic response. In this monkey, when we
injected the HDAd immediately after the IVC balloon was deflated, the plasma cholesterol
went down by 57% at day 6. Therefore, balloon catheter occlusion method appears to
be ~2.5-fold more effective than peripheral i.v. injection (2×1012 vp/kg
vs. 5×1012 vp/kg) in reducing plasma cholesterol (Figure 4). Unexpectedly, the LDLR+/− monkey
(#19498) that showed a cholesterol-lowering response developed a delayed rise in
plasma ALT level in at day 45 after the gene therapy, which lasted until day ~100. This
transient rise in ALT was followed by the attenuation of the HDAd-LDLR-induced plasma
cholesterol normalization and return of hypercholesterolemia. Contrary to our observations
in rhesus monkeys, the previous study in baboons using a similar balloon procedure led to
prolonged transgene expression that was detectable for at least 963 days at a dose of
3×1010 vp/kg[17] that
is 70-fold lower than the dose used here in rhesus monkeys. We considered the unforeseen
side effects of the high dose HDAd and heterogeneous response possibly resulting from the
intrahepatic venous pressure not being maintained during vector injection, and reduced the
dose to1×1012 vp/kg but kept the balloon inflated to maintain elevated
intrahepatic venous pressure during vector injection. This modification in protocol led to a
slightly more intense cholesterol-lowering effect using half the HDAd-LDLR dose (Figure 5). Again, however, we observed a mild transient
serum ALT elevation from day 50 to day 70, followed by a gradual return of the previously
normalized plasma cholesterol to pretreatment (elevated) levels by day 120.It is not clear what causes the increase of liver enzymes and subsequent loss of
LDLR gene transfer effects. We induced overexpression of the monkey LDLR gene in
LDLR+/− monkeys so humoral immunity to the expressed LDLR would not be an
issue, although it is possible that there are individual variations in antigen (or transgene
product) processing and presentation. Interestingly, Brunetti-Pierri et al. reported that
rhesus monkeys treated with HDAd expressing human factor IX (hFIX) at a dose of
1×1012 vp/kg expressed hFIX for up to 1,029 days despite development of
neutralizing antibodies.[18] There is a
fundamental difference in the nature of therapeutic proteins and levels required to reverse
phenotype between FH and hemophilia B individuals. LDLR is a membrane protein and the LDLR
activity must be over 50% of normal activity to achieve therapeutic effects, whereas
FIX is a secretory protein and as little as 1% of normal levels can substantially
correct the propensity for bleeding in hemophilia B.[25] Although humoral immune responses to therapeutic proteins are most
likely not relevant to our findings, we cannot completely exclude such a possibility.Host immune responses to the HDAd vector itself could be another factor in the
delayed failure of treatment. A similar silencing of transgene expression following an
asymptomatic increase of transaminases has been reported in clinical trials of Factor IX
gene therapy using AAV.[20] It was
attributed to pre-existing T cells to AAV capsids, which were reactivated upon AAV-mediated
gene transfer, eliminating the transduced cells. This response appears to be
dose-dependent.[25] We studied the
responses of PBMCs against immunogenic Ad hexon peptides[21] before and after HDAd administration. We did not find any significant T
cell responses. The dose used in this experiment did not influence plasma cholesterol
levels, which suggests that this dose is below the minimum effective dose for LDLR gene
therapy. At such a low dose, HDAd vector does not re-stimulate preexisting memory T cells
despite elevated neutralizing antibodies. In support of this explanation, the frequent
presence of memory T cells against human adenovirus has been reported in humans,[26] while nonhuman primates have very low
frequency of adenovirus-specific T cells in PBMCs.[27] However, high frequency of pre-existing adenovirus-specific T cells in
livers has been reported after active immunization.[28] Therefore, the responses of T cells isolated from PBMCs may not be
sufficient to detect preexisting cellular immunity against Ad in rhesus monkeys. However, we
exhausted available animals after the last experiment and there are no more
LDLR+/− monkeys available to further evaluate the possibility of cellular
immunity by treating LDLR+/− monkeys at a dose of 1×1012
vp/kg or higher, which could replicate the increase of liver enzymes preceding diminished
effects of LDLR gene therapy. Therefore, the cause of the transient nature of the efficacy
of LDLR gene therapy in this study remains speculative. Nonetheless, if the cause of our
findings is related to the preexisting cellular immunity against HDAd vector, a possible
solution is suggested by a recent clinical trial of AAV-mediated transfer of Factor IX for
Hemophilia B, where short term glucocorticoid administration normalized liver enzymes and
maintained Factor IX level.[25]Ad vectors are recognized by the host innate immune system during viral entry and
replication in host cells.[29] We did not
measure cytokine levels in the two monkeys (#19498 and #19269) when they
showed asymptomatic increase of ALT. Although the innate immune response reactions have been
reported in early phase but not in late phase toxicity associated with Ad [30,31], we
cannot completely exclude such a possibility.Despite the disappointment from the unexpected transient elevation of ALT followed
by the loss of efficacy of LDLR gene therapy, we showed that HDAd-mediated LDLR gene therapy
works in a nonhuman primate model of FH. We performed functional assay for LDLR activity 10
days before and 79 days after gene transfer. The two monkeys that showed a good cholesterol
lowering response displayed markedly higher hepatic LDLR mRNA expression concomitant with an
accelerated LDL fractional catabolic rate, which supports a substantial functional
enhancement. It is important to note that we took advantage of a natural nonhuman primate
model of heterozygous FH after our initial experiments in FHmouse models.[9] Not only are there differences in immune
responses between rodents and humans, there are also major differences in lipoprotein
physiology between these species.[11]
Critically important are hemodynamic forces, which cause vascular site-specific effects on
atherosclerosis.[32] Thus, it is
difficult to extrapolate the effect of gene therapy on atherosclerosis development in rodent
models to that in nonhuman primates and humans.[22,23,33]Proprotein convertase subtilisin-like/kexin type 9 (PCSK9), a secreted protease
that mediates degradation of LDLR,[34] has
attracted much attention as a therapeutic target for treating hypercholesterolemia. Both
monoclonal antibodies and siRNA have been reported to reduce LDL cholesterol.[35-37] Recently, the phase 2 trial targeting PCSK9 using a monoclonal antibody
was reported to have achieved substantial further LDL-C reduction in patients with
heterozygous FH who were treated with high-dose statins[38] and raised the question whether inhibition of PSCSK9 in homozygous FHpatients respond to the treatment.[39]
Homozygous FHpatients showed some responses to drug treatment in part via upregulation of
the LDLR.[40] However, PCSK9 facilitates
LDLR degradation by binding to LDLR and preventing its recycling.[34] Therefore, the inhibition of PSCK9 may not achieve the
targeting LDL-C levels in homozygous FHpatients with residual or no LDLR activity. More
studies are needed to determine whether targeting PSCK9 will be a treatment of choice for
FH. ApoB100, the major protein component of LDL, is another potential therapeutic target.
The use of lipid encapsulated siRNA targeting apoB100 was found to silence apoB mRNA in
rodents and nonhuman primates.[41,42]. Alternatively, AAV expressing apoB mRNA-specific shRNA
produced long-term apoB silencing and LDL cholesterol lowering in mice[43,44]. It is unclear
which of these therapeutic approaches will turn out to be the most safe and efficacious
therapies to lower plasma lipids in FHpatients.In summary, we have found that a single intrahepatic arterial injection of HDAd
expressing LDLR accompanied by balloon catheter-based hepatic venous occlusion method
corrects hypercholesterolemia in nonhuman primate model of heterozygous FH. Nevertheless,
the invasive nature of the procedure, the narrow margin between the effective and the toxic
dose, and the delayed immune response which could be associated with a delayed treatment
failure remain a significant challenge.
Materials and methods
Recombinant helper-dependent adenoviral vector
Seed stock of HDAd expressing rhesus monkeyLDLR was prepared as
described[9] and large scale vector
production was carried out using a suspension system.[45] Helper virus contamination and potential rearrangement were
determined by quantitative PCR (qPCR) using SYBR Green and Southern blot analysis. The
infectious titer of HDAd was defined by relative infectivity to an Adenovirus Type 5
Reference Material (VR-1516, ATCC) in competition to infect HEK293 cells[45] except quantification of vectors by
qPCR.[46] Helper virus contamination
measured by real time PCR was 0.05–0.01% and the ratio of viral particles
and infectious particles was approximately 15:1. Endotoxin levels tested by Limulus
Amebocyte Lysate was <0.05 EU/ml.
Nonhuman primates
Normal LDLR+/+ and heterozygous LDLR+/− rhesus
monkeys were housed at the Southwest Foundation for Biomedical Research. Animals of both
sex between 3 and 6 kg body weight (Table 1) were
fed rhesus western type diet (40% calories from saturated fat and 0.3 mg/Kcal
cholesterol) for 7 weeks prior to initiating the sampling schedule and maintained on the
diet through the experiment. Animals used for balloon-occlusion based injection into
hepatic artery are summarized in Table 1. All
animal protocols were performed according to the guidelines of Institutional Animal Care
and Usage Committee at the Texas Biomedical Research Institute.
Direct vector delivery into hepatic artery
HDAd was directly delivered to hepatic artery after hepatic venous flow
occlusion (Figure 2a) as described by Brunetti-Pieri
et al.[17] In brief, a 4 French sheath was
placed in the right femoral vein, an 11 French sheath in the left femoral vein and a 4
French sheath in the left femoral artery (FA) by standard percutaneous technique. A
20-gauge arterial catheter was placed in the femoral artery for continuous monitoring
blood pressure. The custom made 8×3 cm2 balloon occlusion catheter
(NuMED, Hopkinton, NY) was introduced into the right femoral vein sheath and positioned in
the inferior vena cava (IVC) with the tip just within the IVC-right arterial junction. The
placement of the balloon was visualized using fluoroscopy after inflating the balloon
catheter (Figure. 2b, c). HDAd or saline in a volume
of 2 ml were injected at a rate of 0.5 ml/15 seconds while balloon was inflated through a
catheter placed in the hepatic artery. The catheter was flushed with 20 ml of saline; the
balloon remained inflated for additional 5 min and then deflated. The occlusion was
monitored by venous pressure (Figure 2d).
Assay for cytotoxic T lymphocytes (CTL)
CTL activity was measured by INF-γ secretion by lymphocytes upon
stimulation with adenoviral peptides.[47,48] Blood (5 mL) was collected with
preservative-free heparin at −21, 34 and 70 days posttreatment and lymphocytes and
plasma were isolated using Lymphocyte separation medium (Lymphoprep, Axis-Shield).
Lymphocytes were frozen at −80°C in freezing medium until use. Cells were
thawed and incubated overnight. Pools of 188 overlapping 20 mer peptides derived from
immunodominant virion protein, hexon (JPT peptide Technologies)[21] were added to the culture next day, and the secreted
IFN-γ was captured by the immobilized antibody using a kit from R&D Systems
Inc. (cat#EL961). After the formation of colored spots, the membrane was sent to
ZellNet Consulting, Inc. for the analysis.
Assay for neutralizing antibodies
The neutralizing antibody titer was determined by an in vitro
transduction-inhibition assay. In brief, cells (116 cell line) were plated in a 96-well
plate at the density of 1×105 cells/well 2 days prior to infection.
Plasma was heat-inactivated at 55°C for 30 min and serially diluted into a 96-well
plate (0.1 ml/well). HDAd vector expressing EGFP under elongation factor-1 promoter
(HDAd-EGFP) was diluted to 2×108 vp/mL and 0.1 ml of the diluted HDAd
vector/well was added to the 96-well plate containing diluted plasma. The plate was
incubated at 37°C for 1 hour and then 0.1 ml of plasma/HDAd-EGFP mixture was
transferred to wells of a 96-well plate containing the 116 cells. After 30 minutes, 0.1 ml
of growth medium was added and incubated in CO2 incubator for 20 hours and the
fluorescence was measured by FLUO Star Omega microplate reader (BMG Labtech Inc., Durham,
NC).
Kinetic analysis
LDL (d=1.019−1.063) was isolated from donor monkeys, iodinated
and intravenously injected into vector treated monkeys.[49] LDL apoB turnover data collected for plasma and
urinary radioactivity at designated times were analyzed using a two-compartment model,
which is characterized by a plasma compartment and an extravascular exchange
compartment.[49]
Other procedures
Serum IL-6 concentrations were determined by Specialty Laboratories (Santa
Monica, CA). LDLR mRNA levels in needle biopsies of liver were quantified by TaqMan RT-PCR
and normalized to β-actin using human probes (Life Technologies, NY).
Authors: Daniel M Appledorn; Sonika Patial; Aaron McBride; Sarah Godbehere; Nico Van Rooijen; Narayanan Parameswaran; Andrea Amalfitano Journal: J Immunol Date: 2008-08-01 Impact factor: 5.422
Authors: Evan A Stein; Dan Gipe; Jean Bergeron; Daniel Gaudet; Robert Weiss; Robert Dufour; Richard Wu; Robert Pordy Journal: Lancet Date: 2012-05-26 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Jürgen Soutschek; Akin Akinc; Birgit Bramlage; Klaus Charisse; Rainer Constien; Mary Donoghue; Sayda Elbashir; Anke Geick; Philipp Hadwiger; Jens Harborth; Matthias John; Venkitasamy Kesavan; Gary Lavine; Rajendra K Pandey; Timothy Racie; Kallanthottathil G Rajeev; Ingo Röhl; Ivanka Toudjarska; Gang Wang; Silvio Wuschko; David Bumcrot; Victor Koteliansky; Stefan Limmer; Muthiah Manoharan; Hans-Peter Vornlocher Journal: Nature Date: 2004-11-11 Impact factor: 49.962
Authors: Ann M Leen; Uluhan Sili; Elio F Vanin; Alan M Jewell; Weidong Xie; Dario Vignali; Pedro A Piedra; Malcolm K Brenner; Cliona M Rooney Journal: Blood Date: 2004-07-20 Impact factor: 22.113
Authors: Nicola Brunetti-Pierri; Donna J Palmer; Arthur L Beaudet; K Dee Carey; Milton Finegold; Philip Ng Journal: Hum Gene Ther Date: 2004-01 Impact factor: 5.695
Authors: Michael J Koren; Pernille Lundqvist; Michael Bolognese; Joel M Neutel; Maria Laura Monsalvo; Jingyuan Yang; Jae B Kim; Rob Scott; Scott M Wasserman; Harold Bays Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2014-03-29 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: Maria Mytilinaiou; Ioannis Kyrou; Mike Khan; Dimitris K Grammatopoulos; Harpal S Randeva Journal: Front Pharmacol Date: 2018-07-12 Impact factor: 5.810