Literature DB >> 25230311

The incentive amplifying effects of nicotine are reduced by selective and non-selective dopamine antagonists in rats.

Matthew I Palmatier1, Marissa R Kellicut2, A Brianna Sheppard2, Russell W Brown2, Donita L Robinson3.   

Abstract

Nicotine is a psychomotor stimulant with 'reinforcement enhancing' effects--the actions of nicotine in the brain increase responding for non-nicotine rewards. We hypothesized that this latter effect of nicotine depends on increased incentive properties of anticipatory cues; consistent with this hypothesis, multiple laboratories have reported that nicotine increases sign tracking, i.e. approach to a conditioned stimulus (CS), in Pavlovian conditioned-approach tasks. Incentive motivation and sign tracking are mediated by mesolimbic dopamine (DA) transmission and nicotine facilitates mesolimbic DA release. Therefore, we hypothesized that the incentive-promoting effects of nicotine would be impaired by DA antagonists. To test this hypothesis, separate groups of rats were injected with nicotine (0.4mg/kg base) or saline prior to Pavlovian conditioning sessions in which a CS (30s illumination of a light or presentation of a lever) was immediately followed by a sweet reward delivered in an adjacent location. Both saline and nicotine pretreated rats exhibited similar levels of conditioned approach to the reward location (goal tracking), but nicotine pretreatment significantly increased approach to the CS (sign tracking), regardless of type (lever or light). The DAD1 antagonist SCH-23390 and the DAD2/3 antagonist eticlopride reduced conditioned approach in all rats, but specifically reduced goal tracking in the saline pretreated rats and sign tracking in the nicotine pretreated rats. The non-selective DA antagonist flupenthixol reduced sign-tracking in nicotine rats at all doses tested; however, only the highest dose of flupenthixol reduced goal tracking in both nicotine and saline groups. The reductions in conditioned approach behavior, especially those by SCH-23390, were dissociated from simple motor suppressant effects of the antagonists. These experiments are the first to investigate the effects of dopaminergic drugs on the facilitation of sign-tracking engendered by nicotine and they implicate dopaminergic systems both in conditioned approach as well as the incentive-promoting effects of nicotine.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Conditioning; Dopamine receptor antagonist; Goal tracking; Nicotine; Sign tracking

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25230311      PMCID: PMC4440414          DOI: 10.1016/j.pbb.2014.08.012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pharmacol Biochem Behav        ISSN: 0091-3057            Impact factor:   3.533


  68 in total

1.  Euphoriant effects of nicotine in smokers: fact or artifact?

Authors:  Reuven Dar; Rachel Kaplan; Lior Shaham; Hanan Frenk
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2007-01-19       Impact factor: 4.530

Review 2.  A neural substrate of prediction and reward.

Authors:  W Schultz; P Dayan; P R Montague
Journal:  Science       Date:  1997-03-14       Impact factor: 47.728

3.  Nicotine content of cigarettes and the smoking habit: their relevance to subjective ratings of preferences in smokers.

Authors:  C Agué
Journal:  Psychopharmacologia       Date:  1972

4.  Social interaction promotes nicotine self-administration with olfactogustatory cues in adolescent rats.

Authors:  Hao Chen; Burt M Sharp; Shannon G Matta; Qingling Wu
Journal:  Neuropsychopharmacology       Date:  2011-07-27       Impact factor: 7.853

5.  Sex differences in nicotine sensitization and conditioned hyperactivity in adolescent rats neonatally treated with quinpirole: role of D2 and D3 receptor subtypes.

Authors:  Brianna Sheppard; Julia Lehmann; Zackary A Cope; Russell W Brown
Journal:  Behav Neurosci       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 1.912

6.  Cue-reactors: individual differences in cue-induced craving after food or smoking abstinence.

Authors:  Stephen V Mahler; Harriet de Wit
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-11-10       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Inactivation of the medial prefrontal cortex of the rat impairs strategy set-shifting, but not reversal learning, using a novel, automated procedure.

Authors:  Stan B Floresco; Annie E Block; Maric T L Tse
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  2008-02-15       Impact factor: 3.332

8.  Genetic reconstruction of dopamine D1 receptor signaling in the nucleus accumbens facilitates natural and drug reward responses.

Authors:  Bryan B Gore; Larry S Zweifel
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2013-05-15       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 9.  Predictive reward signal of dopamine neurons.

Authors:  W Schultz
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1998-07       Impact factor: 2.714

10.  Metabotropic glutamate 5 receptor (mGluR5) antagonists decrease nicotine seeking, but do not affect the reinforcement enhancing effects of nicotine.

Authors:  Matthew I Palmatier; Xiu Liu; Eric C Donny; Anthony R Caggiula; Alan F Sved
Journal:  Neuropsychopharmacology       Date:  2007-11-28       Impact factor: 7.853

View more
  11 in total

1.  Sex and Adolescent Ethanol Exposure Influence Pavlovian Conditioned Approach.

Authors:  Aric C Madayag; Sierra J Stringfield; Kathryn J Reissner; Charlotte A Boettiger; Donita L Robinson
Journal:  Alcohol Clin Exp Res       Date:  2017-03-13       Impact factor: 3.455

2.  Orbitofrontal participation in sign- and goal-tracking conditioned responses: Effects of nicotine.

Authors:  Sierra J Stringfield; Matthew I Palmatier; Charlotte A Boettiger; Donita L Robinson
Journal:  Neuropharmacology       Date:  2016-12-22       Impact factor: 5.250

3.  Nicotine Self-Administration With Tobacco Flavor Additives in Male Rats.

Authors:  Matthew I Palmatier; Amanda L Smith; Ethan M Odineal; Emily A Williams; Ashley B Sheppard; Curtis A Bradley
Journal:  Nicotine Tob Res       Date:  2020-02-06       Impact factor: 4.244

4.  Individual variation in the motivational properties of a nicotine cue: sign-trackers vs. goal-trackers.

Authors:  Lindsay M Yager; Terry E Robinson
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2015-05-19       Impact factor: 4.530

Review 5.  Cued for risk: Evidence for an incentive sensitization framework to explain the interplay between stress and anxiety, substance abuse, and reward uncertainty in disordered gambling behavior.

Authors:  Samantha N Hellberg; Trinity I Russell; Mike J F Robinson
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2019-06       Impact factor: 3.282

6.  Nicotine-induced enhancement of a sensory reinforcer in adult rats: antagonist pretreatment effects.

Authors:  Doran J Satanove; Simon Rahman; T M Vanessa Chan; Suelynn Ren; Paul B S Clarke
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2020-11-04       Impact factor: 4.530

7.  Ethanol Exposure History and Alcoholic Reward Differentially Alter Dopamine Release in the Nucleus Accumbens to a Reward-Predictive Cue.

Authors:  Amanda M Fiorenza; Tatiana A Shnitko; Kaitlin M Sullivan; Sudheer R Vemuru; Alexander Gomez-A; Julie Y Esaki; Charlotte A Boettiger; Claudio Da Cunha; Donita L Robinson
Journal:  Alcohol Clin Exp Res       Date:  2018-04-30       Impact factor: 3.455

8.  The tendency to sign-track predicts cue-induced reinstatement during nicotine self-administration, and is enhanced by nicotine but not ethanol.

Authors:  Cassandra L Versaggi; Christopher P King; Paul J Meyer
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2016-06-09       Impact factor: 4.530

9.  Shifts in the neurobiological mechanisms motivating cocaine use with the development of an addiction-like phenotype in male rats.

Authors:  Wendy J Lynch; Anousheh Bakhti-Suroosh; Jean M Abel; Camilla Davis
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2020-11-25       Impact factor: 4.530

10.  Systemic nicotine enhances opioid self-administration and modulates the formation of opioid-associated memories partly through actions within the insular cortex.

Authors:  Gregory C Loney; Christopher P King; Paul J Meyer
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-02-08       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.