Amanda M Fiorenza1, Tatiana A Shnitko2, Kaitlin M Sullivan2, Sudheer R Vemuru2, Alexander Gomez-A3, Julie Y Esaki3, Charlotte A Boettiger4, Claudio Da Cunha1,3, Donita L Robinson2. 1. Departamento de Bioquímica, Universidade Federal do Paraná, Curitiba, Paraná, Brazil. 2. Department of Psychiatry and Bowles Center for Alcohol Studies, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina. 3. Departamento de Farmacologia, Universidade Federal do Paraná, Curitiba, Paraná, Brazil. 4. Department of Psychology & Neuroscience, Bowles Center for Alcohol Studies and Biomedical Research Imaging Center, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Conditioned stimuli (CS) that predict reward delivery acquire the ability to induce phasic dopamine release in the nucleus accumbens (NAc). This dopamine release may facilitate conditioned approach behavior, which often manifests as approach to the site of reward delivery (called "goal-tracking") or to the CS itself (called "sign-tracking"). Previous research has linked sign-tracking in particular to impulsivity and drug self-administration, and addictive drugs may promote the expression of sign-tracking. Ethanol (EtOH) acutely promotes phasic release of dopamine in the accumbens, but it is unknown whether an alcoholic reward alters dopamine release to a CS. We hypothesized that Pavlovian conditioning with an alcoholic reward would increase dopamine release triggered by the CS and subsequent sign-tracking behavior. Moreover, we predicted that chronic intermittent EtOH (CIE) exposure would promote sign-tracking while acute administration of naltrexone (NTX) would reduce it. METHODS: Rats received 14 doses of EtOH (3 to 5 g/kg, intragastric) or water followed by 6 days of Pavlovian conditioning training. Rewards were a chocolate solution with or without 10% (w/v) alcohol. We used fast-scan cyclic voltammetry to measure phasic dopamine release in the NAc core in response to the CS and the rewards. We also determined the effect of NTX (1 mg/kg, subcutaneous) on conditioned approach. RESULTS: Both CIE and alcoholic reward, individually but not together, associated with greater dopamine to the CS than control conditions. However, this increase in dopamine release was not linked to greater sign-tracking, as both CIE and alcoholic reward shifted conditioned approach from sign-tracking behavior to goal-tracking behavior. However, they both also increased sensitivity to NTX, which reduced goal-tracking behavior. CONCLUSIONS: While a history of EtOH exposure or alcoholic reward enhanced dopamine release to a CS, they did not promote sign-tracking under the current conditions. These findings are consistent with the interpretation that EtOH can stimulate conditioned approach, but indicate that the conditioned response may manifest as goal-tracking.
BACKGROUND: Conditioned stimuli (CS) that predict reward delivery acquire the ability to induce phasic dopamine release in the nucleus accumbens (NAc). This dopamine release may facilitate conditioned approach behavior, which often manifests as approach to the site of reward delivery (called "goal-tracking") or to the CS itself (called "sign-tracking"). Previous research has linked sign-tracking in particular to impulsivity and drug self-administration, and addictive drugs may promote the expression of sign-tracking. Ethanol (EtOH) acutely promotes phasic release of dopamine in the accumbens, but it is unknown whether an alcoholic reward alters dopamine release to a CS. We hypothesized that Pavlovian conditioning with an alcoholic reward would increase dopamine release triggered by the CS and subsequent sign-tracking behavior. Moreover, we predicted that chronic intermittent EtOH (CIE) exposure would promote sign-tracking while acute administration of naltrexone (NTX) would reduce it. METHODS:Rats received 14 doses of EtOH (3 to 5 g/kg, intragastric) or water followed by 6 days of Pavlovian conditioning training. Rewards were a chocolate solution with or without 10% (w/v) alcohol. We used fast-scan cyclic voltammetry to measure phasic dopamine release in the NAc core in response to the CS and the rewards. We also determined the effect of NTX (1 mg/kg, subcutaneous) on conditioned approach. RESULTS: Both CIE and alcoholic reward, individually but not together, associated with greater dopamine to the CS than control conditions. However, this increase in dopamine release was not linked to greater sign-tracking, as both CIE and alcoholic reward shifted conditioned approach from sign-tracking behavior to goal-tracking behavior. However, they both also increased sensitivity to NTX, which reduced goal-tracking behavior. CONCLUSIONS: While a history of EtOH exposure or alcoholic reward enhanced dopamine release to a CS, they did not promote sign-tracking under the current conditions. These findings are consistent with the interpretation that EtOH can stimulate conditioned approach, but indicate that the conditioned response may manifest as goal-tracking.
Authors: Ruud van den Bos; Johanneke van der Harst; Natalie Vijftigschild; Berry Spruijt; Gilles van Luijtelaar; Roald Maes Journal: Behav Brain Res Date: 2004-08-31 Impact factor: 3.332
Authors: Allison M Ahrens; Bryan F Singer; Christopher J Fitzpatrick; Jonathan D Morrow; Terry E Robinson Journal: Behav Brain Res Date: 2015-07-30 Impact factor: 3.352
Authors: Alexander Gómez-A; Tatiana A Shnitko; Kevin L Caref; Saleem M Nicola; Donita L Robinson Journal: Nutr Neurosci Date: 2020-06-24 Impact factor: 4.994
Authors: Amanda Elton; Monica L Faulkner; Donita L Robinson; Charlotte A Boettiger Journal: Neuropsychopharmacology Date: 2021-03-16 Impact factor: 8.294