| Literature DB >> 25230306 |
Fernando Cornelio Jiménez González1, Osslan Osiris Vergara Villegas2, Dulce Esperanza Torres Ramírez3, Vianey Guadalupe Cruz Sánchez4, Humberto Ochoa Domínguez5.
Abstract
Technological innovations in the field of disease prevention and maintenance of patient health have enabled the evolution of fields such as monitoring systems. One of the main advances is the development of real-time monitors that use intelligent and wireless communication technology. In this paper, a system is presented for the remote monitoring of the body temperature and heart rate of a patient by means of a wireless sensor network (WSN) and mobile augmented reality (MAR). The combination of a WSN and MAR provides a novel alternative to remotely measure body temperature and heart rate in real time during patient care. The system is composed of (1) hardware such as Arduino microcontrollers (in the patient nodes), personal computers (for the nurse server), smartphones (for the mobile nurse monitor and the virtual patient file) and sensors (to measure body temperature and heart rate), (2) a network layer using WiFly technology, and (3) software such as LabView, Android SDK, and DroidAR. The results obtained from tests show that the system can perform effectively within a range of 20 m and requires ten minutes to stabilize the temperature sensor to detect hyperthermia, hypothermia or normal body temperature conditions. Additionally, the heart rate sensor can detect conditions of tachycardia and bradycardia.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2014 PMID: 25230306 PMCID: PMC4208221 DOI: 10.3390/s140917212
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sensors (Basel) ISSN: 1424-8220 Impact factor: 3.576
Research on biomedical wireless monitoring systems.
| Dağtas | Patient monitoring in a smart home | Cardiac activity | ZigBee | ECG | CPU | Communication with home server via ZigBee; incoming data stored for future reference | |
| Curtis | Ambulatory patient monitoring system | Vital signs, position of patient | WiFi | GPS, ECG, accelerometer | PDA, CPU | Open platform, low cost, geo-positioning | |
| Abbate | Monitoring system for the elderly | Acceleration and tilt angle | ZigBee, Bluetooth | Accelerometers, gyroscope | CPU | Mobility of nodes | |
| Gómez | Cardiac condition monitoring system | Cardiac activity, pressure and volume | ZigBee | Conductance catheter | FPGA, CPU | Management of multiple signals | |
| Cancela | Parkinson's disease monitoring system | Gait, posture, leg and hand movement | ZigBee | Accelerometer, gyroscope, microphone | PDA | Focused on one disease | |
| Vijayalakshmi | General patient monitoring system | Cardiac activity, respiration, muscle activity | ZigBee, Bluetooth, WiFi | EMG, EEG, EKG | PDA, CPU | Communication with medical server through Internet | |
| Our proposal, 2014 | General patient monitoring system | Cardiac activity, Body temperature | WiFi | ECG, Body temperature | Smartphone, CPU | Communication with nurse server and smartphones through Internet | |
Figure 1.General schematic of the levels of the SMTRPM.
Figure 2.Sink node connected to BT and HR sensors: (a) general view of the sink node; (b) sink node attached to HR sensor; (c) sink node attached to BT sensor.
Figure 3.BT prototype: (a) BT sensor based on an NTC-CL80 thermistor and (b) elastic band with the thermistor located to acquire the patient's BT.
Comparative trials between the BT prototype and the commercial thermometer.
| 3247.35 | 36.05 °C | 36.5 °C | 0.012 |
| 3273.35 | 36.16 °C | 36.5 °C | 0.009 |
| 36.43 °C | 36.5 °C | 0.002 |
Figure 4.Heart rate prototype: (a) the photoplethysmographic sensor located on the patient's finger and (b) an example of an ECG curve showing how to identify the R wave and the N-N interval.
Comparative trials between the HR prototype and a conventional digital watch.
| 1 | 72 | 76 | 0.056 | |
| 2 | 65 | 65 | 0 | |
| 3 | 70 | 68 | 0.029 | |
| 4 | 72 | 76 | 0.056 | |
| 5 | 68 | 65 | 0.044 | |
| 6 | 65 | 69 | 0.062 | |
| 7 | 72 | 68 | 0.056 | |
| 8 | 82 | 85 | 0.037 | |
| 9 | 86 | 85 | 0.012 | |
| 10 | 65 | 65 | 0 | |
Figure 5.Flow diagram for the BT algorithm.
Figure 6.Flow diagram for the HR algorithm.
Figure 7.Specific anomaly detection via AODV (ad hoc on-demand vector) routing.
Figure 8.General anomaly detection via AODV routing.
HR package.
| Normal | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Tachycardia | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 |
| Bradycardia | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
Figure 9.Monitor screen of the NSI showing the BT behavior of the last patient node measured in °C.
Figure 10.Main screen of the NSI showing the monitoring of two rooms and four patients.
Figure 11.Patient hyperthermia condition alarm displayed on the mobile nurse monitor.
Figure 12.Example of VPF application: (a) VPF shows current BT value, and (b) VPF shows current HR value.
Figure 13.BT measurement trials with different β values to determine the response time of the BT prototype.
Figure 14.Tests of HR measurements in patients following physical activity.
Figure 15.Tests of HR measurements in patients without previous physical activity.
Communication test (packet loss rate values).
| 6 m | 0.13% | Private one | 0.11% |
| 12 m | 0.19% | Private two | 0.14% |
| 20 m | 0.8% | Public one | 48% |
| 23 m | No comm | Public two | No comm |
Comparative test between the diagnostics provided by the SMTRPM and the nurses.
| Tachycardia | 4% | 6% | |
| Bradycardia | 2% | 10% | |
| Hyperthermia | 0% | 0% | |
| Hypothermia | 2% | 0% |