Mariana Selwaness1, Quirijn van den Bouwhuijsen1, Robbert S van Onkelen1, Albert Hofman1, Oscar H Franco1, Aad van der Lugt1, Jolanda J Wentzel1, Meike Vernooij2. 1. From the Departments of Epidemiology (M.S., Q.v.d.B., R.S.v.O., A.H., O.H.F., M.V.), Radiology (Q.v.d.B., A.v.d.L., M.V.), and Cardiology (J.J.W.), Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, The Netherlands. 2. From the Departments of Epidemiology (M.S., Q.v.d.B., R.S.v.O., A.H., O.H.F., M.V.), Radiology (Q.v.d.B., A.v.d.L., M.V.), and Cardiology (J.J.W.), Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, The Netherlands. m.vernooij@erasmusmc.nl.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Ischemic stroke is more often diagnosed in the left hemisphere than in the right. It is unknown whether this asymmetrical prevalence relates to differences in carotid atherosclerosis. We compared atherosclerotic plaque prevalence, severity, and composition between left and right carotid arteries. METHODS: In a population-based cohort, carotid MRI scanning was performed in 1414 stroke-free participants (≥45 years). Using a multisequence MRI protocol, we assessed the prevalence, stenosis, and thickness of the plaque and its predominant component (ie, lipid core, intraplaque hemorrhage, calcification, or fibrous tissue in each carotid artery). Differences between left and right side were tested using paired t tests, McNemar test and Generalized Estimating Equation analyses. RESULTS: The majority (85%) of the participants had bilateral carotid plaques. Unilateral plaques were twice more prevalent on the left than on the right side (67% versus 33%; P<0.001). Plaque thickness was also greater on the left (3.1±1.2 versus 2.9±1.3 mm; P<0.001); degree of stenosis did not differ. Intraplaque hemorrhage and fibrous tissue were more prevalent on the left (9.1 versus 5.9%; P<0.001 and 45.0 versus 38.5%; P<0.001), whereas calcification occurred more often on the right (37.4 versus 31.6% at the left; P<0.001). Lipid was equally distributed. CONCLUSIONS: Carotid atherosclerotic plaque size and composition are not symmetrically distributed. Predominance of intraplaque hemorrhage in left-sided carotid plaques suggests a greater vulnerability as opposed to right-sided plaques, which are more calcified and therefore considered more stable.
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE:Ischemic stroke is more often diagnosed in the left hemisphere than in the right. It is unknown whether this asymmetrical prevalence relates to differences in carotid atherosclerosis. We compared atherosclerotic plaque prevalence, severity, and composition between left and right carotid arteries. METHODS: In a population-based cohort, carotid MRI scanning was performed in 1414 stroke-free participants (≥45 years). Using a multisequence MRI protocol, we assessed the prevalence, stenosis, and thickness of the plaque and its predominant component (ie, lipid core, intraplaque hemorrhage, calcification, or fibrous tissue in each carotid artery). Differences between left and right side were tested using paired t tests, McNemar test and Generalized Estimating Equation analyses. RESULTS: The majority (85%) of the participants had bilateral carotid plaques. Unilateral plaques were twice more prevalent on the left than on the right side (67% versus 33%; P<0.001). Plaque thickness was also greater on the left (3.1±1.2 versus 2.9±1.3 mm; P<0.001); degree of stenosis did not differ. Intraplaque hemorrhage and fibrous tissue were more prevalent on the left (9.1 versus 5.9%; P<0.001 and 45.0 versus 38.5%; P<0.001), whereas calcification occurred more often on the right (37.4 versus 31.6% at the left; P<0.001). Lipid was equally distributed. CONCLUSIONS: Carotid atherosclerotic plaque size and composition are not symmetrically distributed. Predominance of intraplaque hemorrhage in left-sided carotid plaques suggests a greater vulnerability as opposed to right-sided plaques, which are more calcified and therefore considered more stable.
Authors: Albert Hofman; Guy G O Brusselle; Sarwa Darwish Murad; Cornelia M van Duijn; Oscar H Franco; André Goedegebure; M Arfan Ikram; Caroline C W Klaver; Tamar E C Nijsten; Robin P Peeters; Bruno H Ch Stricker; Henning W Tiemeier; André G Uitterlinden; Meike W Vernooij Journal: Eur J Epidemiol Date: 2015-09-19 Impact factor: 8.082
Authors: Benjamin Ungar; Ana B Pavel; Philip M Robson; Audrey Kaufman; Alison Pruzan; Patrick Brunner; Shivani Kaushik; James G Krueger; Mark G Lebwohl; Venkatesh Mani; Zahi A Fayad; Emma Guttman-Yassky Journal: J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract Date: 2020-07-25
Authors: Marnie G Silverstein-Metzler; Jamie N Justice; Susan E Appt; Leanne Groban; Dalane W Kitzman; John Jeffrey Carr; Thomas C Register; Carol A Shively Journal: Menopause Date: 2017-10 Impact factor: 2.953
Authors: J Kikuta; K Kamagata; K Takabayashi; T Taoka; H Yokota; C Andica; A Wada; Y Someya; Y Tamura; R Kawamori; H Watada; S Naganawa; S Aoki Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2021-11-18 Impact factor: 3.825
Authors: Victor J Del Brutto; Chuanhui Dong; Kaylie Cullison; Michelle R Caunca; Marialaura Simonetto; Digna E Cabral; Jose Gutierrez; Mitchell S V Elkind; Ralph L Sacco; Tatjana Rundek Journal: J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis Date: 2022-05-26 Impact factor: 2.677
Authors: Sibu Mundiyanapurath; Peter Arthur Ringleb; Sascha Diatschuk; Mikkel Bo Hansen; Kim Mouridsen; Leif Østergaard; Wolfgang Wick; Martin Bendszus; Alexander Radbruch Journal: PLoS One Date: 2016-06-23 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Pedro P Santos; Paula S Da Silveira; Fabio L Souza-Duran; Jaqueline H Tamashiro-Duran; Márcia Scazufca; Paulo R Menezes; Claudia Da Costa Leite; Paulo A Lotufo; Homero Vallada; Maurício Wajngarten; Tânia C De Toledo Ferraz Alves; Patricia Rzezak; Geraldo F Busatto Journal: Front Psychol Date: 2017-01-26