Literature DB >> 25228213

Measuring peritoneal absorption with the prolonged peritoneal equilibration test from 4 to 8 hours using various glucose concentrations.

Josep Teixidó-Planas1, Maria Isabel Troya-Saborido2, Guillermo Pedreira-Robles2, Milagros Del-Rio-Lafuente2, Ramon Romero-Gonzalez2, Josep Bonet-Sol2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Peritoneal fluid flows such as small-pore ultrafiltration and free water transport can now be calculated by means of the modified peritoneal equilibration test (PET). To calculate peritoneal fluid absorption, volume markers have been used, but that method is not easily applicable in clinical practice. Alternatively, absorption can be estimated using the personal dialysis capacity test. However, a method of measuring overall peritoneal absorption together with the PET is lacking. The aim of the present study was to assess whether overall peritoneal absorption was different when measured from the 4th to 8th hour in a prolonged PET using three different glucose solutions.
METHODS: The study enrolled 32 stable peritoneal dialysis (PD) patients from a tertiary university hospital, who underwent three 8-hour prolonged PETs with 1.36%, 2.27%, and 3.86% glucose solution. The PETs were performed in random order over a period of less than 1 month. During the prolonged PET, the peritoneal volume was emptied and reinfused at 60 and 240 minutes and drained at 480 minutes. Peritoneal absorption was calculated as the volume difference between the 4th and the 8th hour.
RESULTS: The dialysate-to-plasma ratio (D/P) of urea, the D/P creatinine, and the mass transfer area coefficient (MTC) of creatinine at 240 minutes were not significantly different with the three glucose solutions. The end-to-initial (D/D0) glucose, MTC urea, and MTC glucose were significantly different. All water transport parameters were significantly different, except for the 4- to 8-hour absorption volumes and rates. The peritoneal absorption rates were, for 1.36% solution, 1.03 ± 0.58 mL/min [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.83 to 1.24 mL/min]; for 2.27% solution, 0.86 ± 0.71 mL/min (95% CI: 0.61 to 1.11 mL/min); and for 3.86% solution, 1.05 ± 0.78 mL/min (95% CI: 0.77 to 1.33 mL/min). Peritoneal absorption volumes and rates from the 4th to the 8th hour showed good correlations for the various solutions.
CONCLUSIONS: Using any glucose solution, the prolonged PET with voiding and reinfusion at the 4th hour could be a practical method for calculating overall peritoneal absorption from the 4th to the 8th hour in PD patients.
Copyright © 2014 International Society for Peritoneal Dialysis.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Peritoneal absorption or reabsorption; peritoneal fluid flow pathways; peritoneal function test; peritoneal water transport

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25228213      PMCID: PMC4164404          DOI: 10.3747/pdi.2013.00235

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Perit Dial Int        ISSN: 0896-8608            Impact factor:   1.756


  38 in total

1.  Mini-peritoneal equilibration test: A simple and fast method to assess free water and small solute transport across the peritoneal membrane.

Authors:  Vincenzo La Milia; Salvatore Di Filippo; Monica Crepaldi; Lucia Del Vecchio; Cesare Dell'Oro; Simeone Andrulli; Francesco Locatelli
Journal:  Kidney Int       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 10.612

2.  A quantitative description of solute and fluid transport during peritoneal dialysis.

Authors:  O Heimbürger; J Waniewski; A Werynski; B Lindholm
Journal:  Kidney Int       Date:  1992-05       Impact factor: 10.612

3.  Fluid kinetics in CAPD patients during dialysis with a bicarbonate-based hypoosmolar solution.

Authors:  D G Struijk; R T Krediet; A L Imholz; G C Koomen; L Arisz
Journal:  Blood Purif       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 2.614

4.  Day-to-day variability of fluid and solute transport in upright and recumbent positions during CAPD.

Authors:  A L Imholz; G C Koomen; W J Voorn; D G Struijk; L Arisz; R T Krediet
Journal:  Nephrol Dial Transplant       Date:  1998-01       Impact factor: 5.992

5.  Physiological properties of the peritoneum in an adult peritoneal dialysis population over a three-year period.

Authors:  Ann-Cathrine Johansson; Börje Haraldsson
Journal:  Perit Dial Int       Date:  2006 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 1.756

Review 6.  Methods for estimation of peritoneal dialysate volume and reabsorption rate using macromolecular markers.

Authors:  J Waniewski; O Heimbürger; M S Park; A Werynski; B Lindholm
Journal:  Perit Dial Int       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 1.756

7.  Analysis of the prevalence and causes of ultrafiltration failure during long-term peritoneal dialysis: a cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Watske Smit; Natalie Schouten; Nicole van den Berg; Monique J Langedijk; Dirk G Struijk; Raymond T Krediet
Journal:  Perit Dial Int       Date:  2004 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 1.756

8.  Lyphatic absorption in CAPD patients with loss of ultrafiltration capacity.

Authors:  O Heimbürger; J Waniewski; A Werynski; M S Park; B Lindholm
Journal:  Blood Purif       Date:  1995 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.614

9.  Indirect measurement of lymphatic absorption in CAPD patients is not influenced by trapping.

Authors:  D G Struijk; G C Koomen; R T Krediet; L Arisz
Journal:  Kidney Int       Date:  1992-06       Impact factor: 10.612

10.  Assessing the peritoneal dialysis capacities of individual patients.

Authors:  B Haraldsson
Journal:  Kidney Int       Date:  1995-04       Impact factor: 10.612

View more
  1 in total

1.  A Uremic Pig Model for Peritoneal Dialysis.

Authors:  Joost C de Vries; Maaike K van Gelder; Anneke S Monninkhof; Sabbir Ahmed; Diënty H M Hazenbrink; Tri Q Nguyen; Gèrard A P de Kort; Evert-Jan P A Vonken; Koen R D Vaessen; Jaap A Joles; Marianne C Verhaar; Karin G F Gerritsen
Journal:  Toxins (Basel)       Date:  2022-09-14       Impact factor: 5.075

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.