Literature DB >> 25228004

N-acetylaspartate and neurofilaments as biomarkers of axonal damage in patients with progressive forms of multiple sclerosis.

Alessandro Trentini1, Manuel Comabella, Mar Tintoré, Marleen J A Koel-Simmelink, Joep Killestein, Birthe Roos, Alex Rovira, Carsten Korth, Philipp Ottis, Marinus A Blankenstein, Xavier Montalban, Tiziana Bellini, Charlotte E Teunissen.   

Abstract

Primary and secondary progressive forms of multiple sclerosis (PPMS and SPMS) have different pathological characteristics. However, it is unknown whether neurodegenerative mechanisms are shared. We measured cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) levels of neurofilament (Nf) light and heavy isoforms and N-acetylaspartic acid (NAA) in 21 PP, 10 SPMS patients and 15 non-inflammatory neurological disease controls (NINDC). Biomarkers were related to Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) and Multiple Sclerosis Severity Score (MSSS) over a long period of follow-up [median (interquartile range) 9 (5.5-12.5) years] in 19 PPMS and 4 SPMS patients, and to T2 lesion load, T1 lesion load, and brain parenchymal fraction at the time of lumbar puncture. Nf light was higher in PPMS (p < 0.005) and Nf heavy was increased in both SPMS and PPMS (p < 0.05 and p < 0.01) compared to NINDC, but were comparable between the two MS subtypes. Nf heavy was a predictor of the ongoing disability measured by MSSS (R(2) = 0.17, β = 0.413; p < 0.05). Conversely, Nf light was the only predictor of the EDSS annual increase (R(2) = 0.195, β = 0.441; p < 0.05). The frequency of abnormal biomarkers did not differ between the two MS progressive subtypes. Our data suggest that PP and SPMS likely share similar mechanisms of axonal damage. Moreover, Nf heavy can be a biomarker of ongoing axonal damage. Conversely, Nf light can be used as a prognostic marker for accumulating disability suggesting it as a good tool for possible treatment monitoring in the progressive MS forms.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25228004     DOI: 10.1007/s00415-014-7507-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurol        ISSN: 0340-5354            Impact factor:   4.849


  21 in total

1.  Multiple sclerosis: Neurofilament light chain antibodies are correlated to cerebral atrophy.

Authors:  M J Eikelenboom; A Petzold; R H C Lazeron; E Silber; M Sharief; E J Thompson; F Barkhof; G Giovannoni; C H Polman; B M J Uitdehaag
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  2003-01-28       Impact factor: 9.910

2.  Elevated neurofilament levels in neurological diseases.

Authors:  Niklas Norgren; Lars Rosengren; Torgny Stigbrand
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2003-10-10       Impact factor: 3.252

3.  Neurofilament light as a prognostic marker in multiple sclerosis.

Authors:  Jonatan Salzer; Anders Svenningsson; Peter Sundström
Journal:  Mult Scler       Date:  2010-01-19       Impact factor: 6.312

4.  A comparative study of CSF neurofilament light and heavy chain protein in MS.

Authors:  Jens Kuhle; Kim Plattner; Jonathan P Bestwick; Raija L Lindberg; Sreeram V Ramagopalan; Niklas Norgren; Ahuva Nissim; Andrea Malaspina; David Leppert; Gavin Giovannoni; Ludwig Kappos
Journal:  Mult Scler       Date:  2013-03-25       Impact factor: 6.312

5.  A consensus protocol for the standardization of cerebrospinal fluid collection and biobanking.

Authors:  C E Teunissen; A Petzold; J L Bennett; F S Berven; L Brundin; M Comabella; D Franciotta; J L Frederiksen; J O Fleming; R Furlan; R Q Hintzen; S G Hughes; M H Johnson; E Krasulova; J Kuhle; M C Magnone; C Rajda; K Rejdak; H K Schmidt; V van Pesch; E Waubant; C Wolf; G Giovannoni; B Hemmer; H Tumani; F Deisenhammer
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  2009-12-01       Impact factor: 9.910

6.  Combination of CSF N-acetylaspartate and neurofilaments in multiple sclerosis.

Authors:  C E Teunissen; E Iacobaeus; M Khademi; L Brundin; N Norgren; M J A Koel-Simmelink; M Schepens; F Bouwman; H A M Twaalfhoven; H J Blom; C Jakobs; C D Dijkstra
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  2009-04-14       Impact factor: 9.910

7.  CSF inflammation and axonal damage are increased and correlate in progressive multiple sclerosis.

Authors:  Jeppe Romme Christensen; Lars Börnsen; Mohsen Khademi; Tomas Olsson; Poul Erik Jensen; Per Soelberg Sørensen; Finn Sellebjerg
Journal:  Mult Scler       Date:  2012-11-24       Impact factor: 6.312

8.  Magnetic resonance spectroscopy markers of disease progression in multiple sclerosis.

Authors:  Sara Llufriu; John Kornak; Helene Ratiney; Joonmi Oh; Don Brenneman; Bruce A Cree; Mehul Sampat; Stephen L Hauser; Sarah J Nelson; Daniel Pelletier
Journal:  JAMA Neurol       Date:  2014-07-01       Impact factor: 18.302

9.  Major differences in the dynamics of primary and secondary progressive multiple sclerosis.

Authors:  A J Thompson; A G Kermode; D Wicks; D G MacManus; B E Kendall; D P Kingsley; W I McDonald
Journal:  Ann Neurol       Date:  1991-01       Impact factor: 10.422

10.  CSF neurofilament and N-acetylaspartate related brain changes in clinically isolated syndrome.

Authors:  M Khalil; C Enzinger; C Langkammer; S Ropele; A Mader; A Trentini; M L G Vane; M Wallner-Blazek; G Bachmaier; J-J Archelos; M J A Koel-Simmelink; M A Blankenstein; S Fuchs; F Fazekas; C E Teunissen
Journal:  Mult Scler       Date:  2012-08-23       Impact factor: 6.312

View more
  12 in total

Review 1.  Body fluid biomarkers for multiple sclerosis--the long road to clinical application.

Authors:  Charlotte E Teunissen; Arjan Malekzadeh; Cyra Leurs; Claire Bridel; Joep Killestein
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurol       Date:  2015-09-22       Impact factor: 42.937

Review 2.  Blood Biomarkers as Outcome Measures in Inflammatory Neurologic Diseases.

Authors:  Nabil K El Ayoubi; Samia J Khoury
Journal:  Neurotherapeutics       Date:  2017-01       Impact factor: 7.620

Review 3.  Multiple sclerosis.

Authors:  Massimo Filippi; Amit Bar-Or; Fredrik Piehl; Paolo Preziosa; Alessandra Solari; Sandra Vukusic; Maria A Rocca
Journal:  Nat Rev Dis Primers       Date:  2018-11-08       Impact factor: 52.329

Review 4.  The developing landscape of diagnostic and prognostic biomarkers for spinal cord injury in cerebrospinal fluid and blood.

Authors:  C H Hulme; S J Brown; H R Fuller; J Riddell; A Osman; J Chowdhury; N Kumar; W E Johnson; K T Wright
Journal:  Spinal Cord       Date:  2016-12-20       Impact factor: 2.772

Review 5.  A Personalized Approach in Progressive Multiple Sclerosis: The Current Status of Disease Modifying Therapies (DMTs) and Future Perspectives.

Authors:  Emanuele D'Amico; Francesco Patti; Aurora Zanghì; Mario Zappia
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2016-10-17       Impact factor: 5.923

Review 6.  Neurofilament light chain as a biological marker for multiple sclerosis: a meta-analysis study.

Authors:  Laisheng Cai; Jingwei Huang
Journal:  Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat       Date:  2018-09-03       Impact factor: 2.570

Review 7.  The Cerebrospinal Fluid in Multiple Sclerosis.

Authors:  Florian Deisenhammer; Henrik Zetterberg; Brit Fitzner; Uwe K Zettl
Journal:  Front Immunol       Date:  2019-04-12       Impact factor: 7.561

8.  Neurofilament light chain level is a weak risk factor for the development of MS.

Authors:  Georgina Arrambide; Carmen Espejo; Herena Eixarch; Luisa M Villar; José C Alvarez-Cermeño; Carmen Picón; Jens Kuhle; Giulio Disanto; Ludwig Kappos; Jaume Sastre-Garriga; Deborah Pareto; Eva Simon; Manuel Comabella; Jordi Río; Carlos Nos; Carmen Tur; Joaquín Castilló; Angela Vidal-Jordana; Ingrid Galán; Maria J Arévalo; Cristina Auger; Alex Rovira; Xavier Montalban; Mar Tintore
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  2016-08-12       Impact factor: 9.910

9.  Serum Neurofilament light: A biomarker of neuronal damage in multiple sclerosis.

Authors:  Giulio Disanto; Christian Barro; Pascal Benkert; Yvonne Naegelin; Sabine Schädelin; Antonella Giardiello; Chiara Zecca; Kaj Blennow; Henrik Zetterberg; David Leppert; Ludwig Kappos; Claudio Gobbi; Jens Kuhle
Journal:  Ann Neurol       Date:  2017-06       Impact factor: 10.422

Review 10.  "Bridging the Gap" Everything that Could Have Been Avoided If We Had Applied Gender Medicine, Pharmacogenetics and Personalized Medicine in the Gender-Omics and Sex-Omics Era.

Authors:  Donato Gemmati; Katia Varani; Barbara Bramanti; Roberta Piva; Gloria Bonaccorsi; Alessandro Trentini; Maria Cristina Manfrinato; Veronica Tisato; Alessandra Carè; Tiziana Bellini
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2019-12-31       Impact factor: 5.923

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.