Literature DB >> 24839987

Magnetic resonance spectroscopy markers of disease progression in multiple sclerosis.

Sara Llufriu1, John Kornak2, Helene Ratiney3, Joonmi Oh4, Don Brenneman3, Bruce A Cree3, Mehul Sampat3, Stephen L Hauser3, Sarah J Nelson4, Daniel Pelletier5.   

Abstract

IMPORTANCE: Predicting disease evolution is becoming essential for optimizing treatment decision making in multiple sclerosis (MS). Multiple sclerosis pathologic damage typically includes demyelination, neuro-axonal loss, and astrogliosis.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the potential of magnetic resonance markers of central nervous system injury to predict brain-volume loss and clinical disability in multiple sclerosis. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Participants were selected from the Multiple Sclerosis Center at the University of California-San Francisco. The preliminary data set included 59 patients with MS and 43 healthy control individuals. The confirmatory data set included 220 patients from an independent, large genotype-phenotype research project. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Baseline N-acetylaspartate (NAA) level, myo-inositol (mI) in normal-appearing white and gray matter, myelin water fraction in normal-appearing white matter, markers of axonal damage, astrogliosis, and demyelination were evaluated as predictors in a preliminary data set. Potential predictors were subsequently tested for replication in a confirmatory data set. Clinical scores and percentage of brain-volume change were obtained annually over 4 years as outcomes. Predictors of outcomes were assessed using linear models, linear mixed-effects models, and logistic regression.
RESULTS: N-acetylaspartate and mI both had statistically significant effects on brain volume, prompting the use of the mI:NAA ratio in normal-appearing white matter as a predictor. The ratio was a predictor of brain-volume change in both cohorts (annual slope in the percentage of brain-volume change/unit of increase in the ratio: -1.68; 95% CI, -3.05 to -0.30; P = .02 in the preliminary study cohort and -1.08; 95% CI, -1.95 to -0.20; P = .02 in the confirmatory study cohort). Furthermore, the mI:NAA ratio predicted clinical disability (Multiple Sclerosis Functional Composite evolution: -0.52 points annually, P < .001; Multiple Sclerosis Functional Composite sustained progression: odds ratio, 2.76/SD increase in the ratio; 95% CI, 1.32 to 6.47; P = .01) in the preliminary data set and predicted Multiple Sclerosis Functional Composite evolution (-0.23 points annually; P = .01), Expanded Disability Status Scale evolution (0.57 points annually; P = .04), and Expanded Disability Status Scale sustained progression (odds ratio, 1.46; 95% CI, 1.10 to 1.94; P = .009) in the confirmatory data set. Myelin water fraction did not show predictive value. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: The mI:NAA ratio in normal-appearing white matter has consistent predictive power on brain atrophy and neurological disability evolution. The combined presence of astrogliosis and axonal damage in white matter has cardinal importance in disease severity.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24839987     DOI: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2014.895

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JAMA Neurol        ISSN: 2168-6149            Impact factor:   18.302


  22 in total

1.  Potential clinical impact of multiparametric quantitative MR spectroscopy in neurological disorders: A review and analysis.

Authors:  Ivan I Kirov; Assaf Tal
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2019-08-08       Impact factor: 4.668

Review 2.  The contribution of astrocytes to the neuroinflammatory response in multiple sclerosis and experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis.

Authors:  Roberta Brambilla
Journal:  Acta Neuropathol       Date:  2019-03-07       Impact factor: 17.088

3.  Whole-Brain Metabolic Abnormalities Are Associated With Mobility in Older Adults With Multiple Sclerosis.

Authors:  Christina Mueller; Jessica F Baird; Robert W Motl
Journal:  Neurorehabil Neural Repair       Date:  2022-02-14       Impact factor: 3.919

4.  N-acetylaspartate and neurofilaments as biomarkers of axonal damage in patients with progressive forms of multiple sclerosis.

Authors:  Alessandro Trentini; Manuel Comabella; Mar Tintoré; Marleen J A Koel-Simmelink; Joep Killestein; Birthe Roos; Alex Rovira; Carsten Korth; Philipp Ottis; Marinus A Blankenstein; Xavier Montalban; Tiziana Bellini; Charlotte E Teunissen
Journal:  J Neurol       Date:  2014-09-17       Impact factor: 4.849

5.  Translocator positron-emission tomography and magnetic resonance spectroscopic imaging of brain glial cell activation in multiple sclerosis.

Authors:  Gourab Datta; Ines R Violante; Gregory Scott; Karl Zimmerman; Andre Santos-Ribeiro; Eugenii A Rabiner; Roger N Gunn; Omar Malik; Olga Ciccarelli; Richard Nicholas; Paul M Matthews
Journal:  Mult Scler       Date:  2016-12-07       Impact factor: 6.312

6.  Recent imaging advances in neurology.

Authors:  Lorenzo Rocchi; Flavia Niccolini; Marios Politis
Journal:  J Neurol       Date:  2015-03-26       Impact factor: 4.849

7.  Altered in vivo brain GABA and glutamate levels are associated with multiple sclerosis central fatigue.

Authors:  Jameen Arm; Georg Oeltzschner; Oun Al-Iedani; Rod Lea; Jeannette Lechner-Scott; Saadallah Ramadan
Journal:  Eur J Radiol       Date:  2021-02-24       Impact factor: 3.528

Review 8.  Motion correction in magnetic resonance spectroscopy.

Authors:  Muhammad G Saleh; Richard A E Edden; Linda Chang; Thomas Ernst
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2020-04-17       Impact factor: 3.737

Review 9.  Nonconventional MRI biomarkers for in vivo monitoring of pathogenesis in multiple sclerosis.

Authors:  Ana C Londoño; Carlos A Mora
Journal:  Neurol Neuroimmunol Neuroinflamm       Date:  2014-11-20

10.  Development of a Sensitive Outcome for Economical Drug Screening for Progressive Multiple Sclerosis Treatment.

Authors:  Peter Kosa; Danish Ghazali; Makoto Tanigawa; Chris Barbour; Irene Cortese; William Kelley; Blake Snyder; Joan Ohayon; Kaylan Fenton; Tanya Lehky; Tianxia Wu; Mark Greenwood; Govind Nair; Bibiana Bielekova
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2016-08-15       Impact factor: 4.003

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.