Literature DB >> 25227878

Experiences, utilisation and outcomes of maternity care in England among women from different socio-economic groups: findings from the 2010 National Maternity Survey.

A Lindquist1,2, J J Kurinczuk1, M Redshaw1, M Knight1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this analysis was to explore the healthcare-seeking behaviours and experiences of maternity care among women from different socio-economic groups in order to improve understanding of why socially disadvantaged women have poorer maternal health outcomes in the UK.
DESIGN: Secondary analysis of a national survey of women conducted 3 months after they had given birth.
SETTING: England. SAMPLE: A total of 5332 women.
METHODS: Logistic regression analysis to investigate differences in outcomes among different socio-economic groups, classified by the Index of Multiple Deprivation (IMD). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Healthcare-seeking behaviours, outcomes and experiences of maternity care.
RESULTS: With each increase in IMD quintile (decrease in socio-economic position), women were shown to be 25% (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 0.75; 95% confidence interval [95% CI] 0.63-0.90) less likely to have had any antenatal care and 15% (aOR 0.85; 95% CI 0.80-0.90) less likely to have had a routine postnatal check-up. They were 4% (aOR 1.04; 95% CI 0.99-1.10) more likely to have had an antenatal hospital admission, 7% (aOR 1.07; 95% CI 0.99-1.16) more likely to have been transferred during labour and 4% (aOR 1.04; 95% CI 0.99-1.09) more likely to have had a caesarean birth, although these results were not statistically significant. With decreasing socio-economic position women were more likely to report that they were not treated respectfully or spoken to in a way they could understand by doctors and midwives.
CONCLUSIONS: This analysis suggests the need for a focusing of professionals and services towards pregnant women from lower socio-economic groups and more targeted maternal public health education towards socially disadvantaged women.
© 2014 The Authors. BJOG An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Index of multiple deprivation; UK; maternity care; socio-economic

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25227878     DOI: 10.1111/1471-0528.13059

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BJOG        ISSN: 1470-0328            Impact factor:   6.531


  27 in total

1.  Evaluating Iowa Severe Maternal Morbidity Trends and Maternal Risk Factors: 2009-2014.

Authors:  Brittni N Frederiksen; Catherine J Lillehoj; Debra J Kane; Dave Goodman; Kristin Rankin
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2017-09

2.  An analysis of demographic and pregnancy outcome data to explain non-attendance for postpartum glucose testing in women with gestational diabetes mellitus: Why are patients missing follow-up?

Authors:  Zora A Castling; Tom Farrell
Journal:  Obstet Med       Date:  2018-11-07

3.  NICU Hospitalization: Long-Term Implications on Parenting and Child Behaviors.

Authors:  Rachel E Lean; Cynthia E Rogers; Rachel A Paul; Emily D Gerstein
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Pediatr       Date:  2018-01-24

4.  Marvellous to mediocre: findings of national survey of UK practice and provision of care in pregnancies after stillbirth or neonatal death.

Authors:  T A Mills; C Ricklesford; A E P Heazell; A Cooke; T Lavender
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2016-05-06       Impact factor: 3.007

5.  Sociodemographic differences in women's experience of early labour care: a mixed methods study.

Authors:  Jane Henderson; Maggie Redshaw
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2017-07-13       Impact factor: 2.692

6.  Parents' experience of perinatal post-mortem following stillbirth: A mixed methods study.

Authors:  Jane Henderson; Maggie Redshaw
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-06-06       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Evaluation of community-level interventions to increase early initiation of antenatal care in pregnancy: protocol for the Community REACH study, a cluster randomised controlled trial with integrated process and economic evaluations.

Authors:  Mary Sawtell; Lorna Sweeney; Meg Wiggins; Cathryn Salisbury; Sandra Eldridge; Lauren Greenberg; Rachael Hunter; Inderjeet Kaur; Christine McCourt; Bethan Hatherall; Gail Findlay; Joanne Morris; Sandra Reading; Adrian Renton; Ruth Adekoya; Belinda Green; Belinda Harvey; Sarah Latham; Kanta Patel; Logan Vanlessen; Angela Harden
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2018-03-05       Impact factor: 2.279

8.  Perinatal health care access, childbirth concerns, and birthing decision-making among pregnant people in California during COVID-19.

Authors:  Mackenzie D M Whipps; Jennifer E Phipps; Leigh Ann Simmons
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2021-07-02       Impact factor: 3.007

9.  Risk factors for maternal morbidity in Victoria, Australia: a population-based study.

Authors:  Anthea C Lindquist; Jennifer J Kurinczuk; Euan M Wallace; Jeremy Oats; Marian Knight
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2015-08-25       Impact factor: 2.692

10.  Project 20: Midwives' insight into continuity of care models for women with social risk factors: what works, for whom, in what circumstances, and how.

Authors:  Hannah Rayment-Jones; Sergio A Silverio; James Harris; Angela Harden; Jane Sandall
Journal:  Midwifery       Date:  2020-01-29       Impact factor: 2.372

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.