Literature DB >> 25227528

[Experience with medial unicompartmental prostheses with a mobile plateau].

M F Pietschmann1, P Weber, A Steinbrück, L Wohlleb, V Jansson, P E Müller.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) has become an accepted therapy for medial osteoarthritis. The main reasons for its popularity are the minimally invasive surgical technique and the reports of excellent long-term results including high patient satisfaction and good knee joint function especially in younger patients.
OBJECTIVES: The purpose of our retrospective study was to evaluate the physical activities of patients who had undergone an Oxford III medial UKA. Special attention was paid to implant positioning and osteoarthritis of the patellofemoral joint.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Of 181 implanted Oxford III prosthesis, 136 (75.1%) could be followed up. The mean age at time of surgery was 65.2 years; the average time of follow-up was 4.2 years. In addition to a physical examination and x-ray, the following scores were obtained: WOMAC (Western Ontario and McMaster Osteoarthritis Index), OKS (Oxford Knee Score), KSS (Knee Society Score), UCLA activity and the Turba score.
RESULTS: The majority of the patients (81%) returned to their sporting activity following knee surgery. Higher complication rates or progression of osteoarthritis associated with sporting activities were not observed. The active patients had significantly higher scores for the OKS, KSS, WOMAC, and UCLA scores. The correct implant position, especially avoiding overcorrection to valgus malalignment, is important for good clinical outcome.
CONCLUSION: Our results demonstrate that a high degree of patient satisfaction in terms of physical and sporting activity can be achieved using the Oxford III UKA for medial osteoarthritis without an increased risk for complications.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25227528     DOI: 10.1007/s00132-014-3010-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Orthopade        ISSN: 0085-4530            Impact factor:   1.087


  44 in total

1.  Oxford medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. A survival analysis of an independent series.

Authors:  U C Svärd; A J Price
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2001-03

2.  Radiological assessment of osteo-arthrosis.

Authors:  J H KELLGREN; J S LAWRENCE
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  1957-12       Impact factor: 19.103

3.  The Oxford unicompartmental knee prosthesis: an independent 10-year survival analysis.

Authors:  Peter Vorlat; Guy Putzeys; Dominique Cottenie; Tom Van Isacker; Nicole Pouliart; Frank Handelberg; Pierre-Paul Casteleyn; Filip Gheysen; René Verdonk
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2005-05-14       Impact factor: 4.342

4.  Free bone cement fragments after minimally invasive unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: an underappreciated problem.

Authors:  S M Hauptmann; P Weber; C Glaser; C Birkenmaier; V Jansson; P E Müller
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2008-05-31       Impact factor: 4.342

5.  Minimally invasive unicompartmental knee replacement: retrospective clinical and radiographic evaluation of 83 patients.

Authors:  Danilo Bruni; Francesco Iacono; Alessandro Russo; Stefano Zaffagnini; Giulio Maria Marcheggiani Muccioli; Simone Bignozzi; Laura Bragonzoni; Maurilio Marcacci
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2009-09-18       Impact factor: 4.342

6.  Pre-operative patellofemoral degenerative changes do not affect the outcome after medial Oxford unicompartmental knee replacement: a report from an independent centre.

Authors:  S N Kang; T O Smith; W B Sprenger De Rover; N P Walton
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2011-04

7.  Patient-perceived outcome measures following unicompartmental knee arthroplasty with mini-incision.

Authors:  I Jahromi; N P Walton; P J Dobson; P L Lewis; D G Campbell
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2004-06-26       Impact factor: 3.075

8.  Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty in patients aged less than 65.

Authors:  Annette W-Dahl; Otto Robertsson; Lars Lidgren; Lisa Miller; David Davidson; Stephen Graves
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 3.717

9.  Assessing activity in joint replacement patients.

Authors:  C A Zahiri; T P Schmalzried; E S Szuszczewicz; H C Amstutz
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  1998-12       Impact factor: 4.757

10.  Unicondylar arthroplasty in knees with deficient anterior cruciate ligaments.

Authors:  Gerard A Engh; Deborah J Ammeen
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 4.176

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.