| Literature DB >> 25227417 |
Eiad Abdelmohsen AlFaris, Naghma Naeem1, Farhana Irfan, Riaz Qureshi, Cees van der Vleuten.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Any curriculum change is essentially an environmental change; therefore there is a need to assess the impact of any change in the curriculum on the students' perception of the Educational Environment (EE) and psychological well-being. The objectives of the current study are to (i) compare the EE perceptions of medical students studying in a System Based Curriculum (SBC) with those studying in a traditional curriculum (ii) compare the rate of depressive symptoms among the same students studying in both types of curricula (iii) determine whether there is a difference in the EE perception and depressive symptoms based on gender and year of study.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2014 PMID: 25227417 PMCID: PMC4177056 DOI: 10.1186/1472-6920-14-192
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Med Educ ISSN: 1472-6920 Impact factor: 2.463
The demographic characteristics of the two groups of students
| Traditional curriculum number (%) | Systemic based curriculum number (%) | Total number | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| Male | 330 (73.5) | 127 (51.0) | 457 |
| Female | 119 (26.5) | 122 (49.0) | 241 | |
| Total | 449 | 249 | 698 | |
|
| First | 239 (52.2) | 122 (49.0) | 361 |
| Second | 219 (47.8) | 127 (51.0) | 346 | |
| Total | 458 | 249 | 707 | |
A comparison of total DREEM scores and BDI scores by year of study
| DREEM | BDI II | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mean total score | Mean total score | |||||||||
| Traditional | System based | T value | P value | Effect Size | Traditional | System based | T value | P value | Effect size | |
| 1st year | 104.54 | 120.97 | 8.5 | <0.0001 | 0.472 | 18.79 (10.8) | 15.88 (9.4) | 2.4 | 0.017 | 0.123 |
| 2nd year | 91.65 | 118.38 | 12.3 | <0.0001 | 16.81 (9.4) | 15.37 (8.3) | 1.27 | 0.20 | ||
| Total | 94.6(21.0) | 118.5 (23.5) | 14.21 | <0.01 | 18.0 (10.3) | 15.6 (8.9) | 2.91 | 0.004 | ||
A comparison of total DREEM scores by sex and year of study
| Curriculum type | Year | Male | Female | Total | P value* | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N | Mean | SD | N | Mean | SD | N | Mean | SD | |||
| Traditional | First | 166 | 99.51 | 19.67 | 73 | 103.38 | 17.37 | 239 | 100.69 | 19.04 | NS |
| Second | 168 | 86.10 | 21.62 | 51 | 93.86 | 18.44 | 219 | 87.90 | 21.14 |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| SBC | First | 57 | 114.89 | 22.31 | 73 | 123.73 | 23.22 | 130 | 119.85 | 23.16 |
|
| Second | 79 | 112.38 | 22.23 | 65 | 123.09 | 24.63 | 144 | 117.22 | 23.87 |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
*LEs improved in the Abdul Jabbar. cribed by Beck*.
*Results are based on two-sided tests assuming equal variances with significance level 0.05.
Demographic characteristics versus BDI II scores and the statistical association (Traditional Curriculum and System Based Curricula)
| Total No. | Minimal n (%) | Mild n (%) | Moderate n (%) | Severe n (%) | Mean total score (SD) | Chi square | P value | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Traditional | Academic year | 1st | 176 | 63 (35.8) | 42 (23.9) | 40 (22.7) | 31 (17.6) | 18.79 (SD = 10.83) | 2.626 | .453 |
| 2nd | 118 | 45 (38.1) | 33 (28.0) | 27 (22.9) | 13 (11.0) | 16.81 (SD = 9.43) | ||||
| Total | 294 | 108 (36.7) | 75 (25.5) | 67 (22.7) | 44 (14.9) | 18.0 (SD = 10.3) | ||||
| Gender | Male | 213 | 91 (42.7) | 55 (25.8) | 38 (17.8) | 29 (13.6) | 16.74 (SD = 10.16) | 16.827 | .001 | |
| Female | 81 | 17 (21.0) | 20 (24.7) | 29 (35.8) | 15 (18.5) | 21.31 (SD = 10.07) | ||||
| SBC | Academic year | 1st | 122 | 59 (48.4) | 30 (24.6) | 24 (19.7) | 9 (7.4) | 15.88 (SD = 9.43) | .833 | .842 |
| 2nd | 127 | 59 (46.5) | 31 (24.4) | 30 (23.6) | 7 (5.5) | 15.37 (SD = 8.36) | ||||
| Total | 249 | 118 (47.4) | 61 (24.4) | 54 (21.6) | 16 (6.4) | 15.6 (SD = 8.9) | ||||
| Gender | Male | 127 | 61 (48.0) | 26 (20.5) | 29 (22.8) | 11 (8.7) | 16.48 (SD = 10.05) | 3.911 | .271 | |
| Female | 122 | 57 (46.7) | 35 (28.7) | 25 (20.5) | 5 (4.1) | 14.72 (SD = 7.43) |