Literature DB >> 25225181

Polyclonal versus monoclonal immunoglobulin-free light chains quantification.

Giuseppe Di Noto1, Elena Cimpoies1, Alessandra Dossi1, Lucia Paolini1, Annalisa Radeghieri1, Luigi Caimi1, Doris Ricotta2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The clinical usefulness of the serum-free light chain assays has expanded since their first description, and further applications other than plasma cell dyscrasia are emerging. Currently, we have the ability to perform the measurements with two certified methods: the Freelite™ assay (The Binding Site Ltd, Birmingham, UK) and the new N Latex free-light chain assay (Siemens, Germany). In the present study, we investigated the impact of free light chain concentrations and structures on their quantification, performed with both tests.
METHODS: A total of 524 serum samples from 497 patients from our routine laboratory were analysed with the Freelite™ and the N Latex free light chain assay. The results were compared in two subgroups: with or without monoclonal component. Twenty-four samples were subsequently investigated for the presence of dimeric and monomeric free light chain with sodium dodecyl sulphate polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis and densitometric quantification.
RESULTS: Methods comparison showed that the Pearson rank correlation coefficients were 0.90 for polyclonal k and 0.91 for polyclonal λ free light chain. Conversely for monoclonal immunoglobulins, the Pearson rank correlation coefficient was lower with 0.82 for kM >500 mg/L and 0.56 for λM >500 mg/L. Furthermore, densitometric quantification of the involved monoclonal free light chains showed that both assays do not reflect the Coomassie-stained protein mass.
CONCLUSION: Samples containing high amounts of a single pathologic free light chain may not be considered like a sample containing a sum of different polyclonal free light chains. Indeed, free light chain dimerization leads to different scatter efficiency of macromolecular complexes.
© The Author(s) 2015 Reprints and permissions: sagepub.co.uk/journalsPermissions.nav.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Monoclonal component; dimers; monomers; plasma cell dyscrasia; serum-free light chain

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25225181     DOI: 10.1177/0004563214553808

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Clin Biochem        ISSN: 0004-5632            Impact factor:   2.057


  4 in total

1.  Serum free light chain quantitative assays: Dilemma of a biomarker.

Authors:  Giovanni Cigliana; Francesca Gulli; Cecilia Napodano; Krizia Pocino; Elena De Santis; Luigi Colacicco; Iole Cordone; Laura Conti; Umberto Basile
Journal:  J Clin Lab Anal       Date:  2017-04-26       Impact factor: 2.352

2.  Analytical Criticalities Associated to Different Immunological Methods for Serum Free Light Chain Detection in Plasma Cell Dyscrasias: A Description of Particular Clinical Cases.

Authors:  Rocco Sabatino; Antonio Perrone; Marco Cuomo; Sandra Liotti; Vittoria Barchiesi; Monica Cantile; Ernesta Cavalcanti
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2017-04-12       Impact factor: 5.923

3.  Using Two Detection Methods to Observe the Changes and Significance of Free Light Chain in Serum and Urine in Patients with Renal Insufficiency.

Authors:  Lengnan Xu; Ban Zhao; Ying Sun; Songlan Wang; Xianguang Chen; Yonghui Mao
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2022-03-29       Impact factor: 3.411

4.  Verification study of free light chains assays on reagent-optimized analysers.

Authors:  Dragana Šegulja; Danica Matišić; Karmela Barišić; Dunja Rogić
Journal:  Biochem Med (Zagreb)       Date:  2019-10-15       Impact factor: 2.313

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.