Literature DB >> 25225000

Mood-dependent integration in discourse comprehension: happy and sad moods affect consistency processing via different brain networks.

Giovanna Egidi1, Alfonso Caramazza2.   

Abstract

According to recent research on language comprehension, the semantic features of a text are not the only determinants of whether incoming information is understood as consistent. Listeners' pre-existing affective states play a crucial role as well. The current fMRI experiment examines the effects of happy and sad moods during comprehension of consistent and inconsistent story endings, focusing on brain regions previously linked to two integration processes: inconsistency detection, evident in stronger responses to inconsistent endings, and fluent processing (accumulation), evident in stronger responses to consistent endings. The analysis evaluated whether differences in the BOLD response for consistent and inconsistent story endings correlated with self-reported mood scores after a mood induction procedure. Mood strongly affected regions previously associated with inconsistency detection. Happy mood increased sensitivity to inconsistency in regions specific for inconsistency detection (e.g., left IFG, left STS), whereas sad mood increased sensitivity to inconsistency in regions less specific for language processing (e.g., right med FG, right SFG). Mood affected more weakly regions involved in accumulation of information. These results show that mood can influence activity in areas mediating well-defined language processes, and highlight that integration is the result of context-dependent mechanisms. The finding that language comprehension can involve different networks depending on people's mood highlights the brain's ability to reorganize its functions.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cognition–emotion interaction; Context; Inconsistency detection; Individual differences; Language network

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25225000     DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2014.09.008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroimage        ISSN: 1053-8119            Impact factor:   6.556


  7 in total

1.  MTurk Participants Have Substantially Lower Evaluative Subjective Well-Being Than Other Survey Participants.

Authors:  Arthur A Stone; Marta Walentynowicz; Stefan Schneider; Doerte U Junghaenel; Cheng K Wen
Journal:  Comput Human Behav       Date:  2019-01-04

Review 2.  Grounding the neurobiology of language in first principles: The necessity of non-language-centric explanations for language comprehension.

Authors:  Uri Hasson; Giovanna Egidi; Marco Marelli; Roel M Willems
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2018-07-24

3.  The Decision Strategies of Adolescents with Different Emotional Stabilities in Unfair Situations.

Authors:  Yajing Si; Lin Jiang; Chanlin Yi; Qi Zhang; Cunbo Li; Jing Yu; Peiyang Li; Qiang Liu; Feng Wan; Fali Li; Dezhong Yao; Peng Xu
Journal:  Neurosci Bull       Date:  2021-08-10       Impact factor: 5.271

4.  The effect of emotion on morphosyntactic learning in foreign language learners.

Authors:  Xinmiao Liu; Xiaodong Xu; Haiyan Wang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-11-26       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Improving ESP Writing Class Learning Outcomes Among Medical University Undergraduates: How Do Emotions Impact?

Authors:  Nan Hu; Min Chen
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2022-06-20

6.  Neural Correlates of Causal Inferences in Discourse Understanding and Logical Problem-Solving: A Meta-Analysis Study.

Authors:  Wangshu Feng; Weijuan Wang; Jia Liu; Zhen Wang; Lingyun Tian; Lin Fan
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2021-06-23       Impact factor: 3.169

7.  In a Bilingual Mood: Mood Affects Lexico-Semantic Processing Differently in Native and Non-Native Languages.

Authors:  Marcin Naranowicz; Katarzyna Jankowiak; Patrycja Kakuba; Katarzyna Bromberek-Dyzman; Guillaume Thierry
Journal:  Brain Sci       Date:  2022-02-26
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.