Literature DB >> 22996916

Correlation of sonographic features of invasive ductal mammary carcinoma with age, tumor grade, and hormone-receptor status.

Michael Aho1, Abid Irshad, Susan J Ackerman, Madelene Lewis, Rebecca Leddy, Thomas L Pope, Amy S Campbell, Abbie Cluver, Bethany J Wolf, Joan E Cunningham.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To determine whether presenting sonographic features of invasive ductal carcinomas (IDC) are associated with patient age, tumor histologic grade, and hormonal receptor status.
METHODS: Sonographic features of 101 consecutive cases of IDC seen at ultrasound were retrospectively assessed based on the BI-RADS criteria of posterior acoustic appearance, tumor margins, and echogenicity. Associations between sonographic features and tumor characteristics were statistically evaluated with attention to patient age.
RESULTS: IDC with shadowing compared with unchanged posterior acoustic appearance were significantly more likely to be of low histologic grade (Odds Ratio [OR] = 5.00; p < 0.05) and estrogen receptor (ER) -positive (OR = 10.00; p < 0.05). Conversely, posterior enhancement was associated with ER-negative status (OR = 4.45; p < 0.01), particularly among patients younger than 60 years of age (OR = 5.36, p < 0.05). Circumscribed tumors were more often high grade, particularly among older women (p < 0.01), and hormone receptor--negative regardless of age group. Among older women, tumors with mixed echogenicity tended to be high grade and progesterone receptor--negative (p values < 0.05). Noncircumscribed borders were observed for all tumors with posterior shadowing, and 97% of such tumors were also ER positive.
CONCLUSIONS: Sonographic features were significantly associated with tumor grade and hormone receptor status, with some differences based on patient age. Specifically, the presence of posterior shadowing was associated with lower histologic grade and ER-positive status, especially in older patients. In contrast, we found that posterior acoustic enhancement was more commonly associated with ER-negative status, especially in younger patients.
Copyright © 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22996916      PMCID: PMC4527309          DOI: 10.1002/jcu.21990

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Ultrasound        ISSN: 0091-2751            Impact factor:   0.910


  19 in total

1.  Correlation between ultrasound characteristics, mammographic findings and histological grade in patients with invasive ductal carcinoma of the breast.

Authors:  P M Lamb; N M Perry; S J Vinnicombe; C A Wells
Journal:  Clin Radiol       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 2.350

2.  Posterior acoustic shadowing in benign breast lesions: sonographic-pathologic correlation.

Authors:  Susan P Weinstein; Emily F Conant; Carolyn Mies; Geza Acs; Steven Lee; Chandra Sehgal
Journal:  J Ultrasound Med       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 2.153

3.  Causes of shadowing in breast sonography.

Authors:  G Kossoff
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  1988       Impact factor: 2.998

4.  Correlation between mammographic and sonographic findings and prognostic factors in patients with node-negative invasive breast cancer.

Authors:  H J Shin; H H Kim; M O Huh; M J Kim; A Yi; H Kim; B H Son; S H Ahn
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2010-08-03       Impact factor: 3.039

5.  The world Health Organization Histological Typing of Breast Tumors--Second Edition. The World Organization.

Authors: 
Journal:  Am J Clin Pathol       Date:  1982-12       Impact factor: 2.493

6.  Diagnostic ultrasound in breast cancer: analysis of retrotumorous echo patterns correlated with sonic attenuation by cancerous connective tissue.

Authors:  T Kobayashi
Journal:  J Clin Ultrasound       Date:  1979-12       Impact factor: 0.910

7.  Racial differences in the incidence of breast cancer subtypes defined by combined histologic grade and hormone receptor status.

Authors:  Joan E Cunningham; Alberto J Montero; Elizabeth Garrett-Mayer; Hans J Berkel; Bert Ely
Journal:  Cancer Causes Control       Date:  2009-12-19       Impact factor: 2.506

8.  [Causes of attenuation of the sound waves in neoplasms of the breast. Histologic and echographic correlation study].

Authors:  G Gozzi; C Cressa; M Bazzocchi; G Stanta; C Vidali
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  1986-04       Impact factor: 3.469

9.  Pathological prognostic factors in breast cancer. I. The value of histological grade in breast cancer: experience from a large study with long-term follow-up.

Authors:  C W Elston; I O Ellis
Journal:  Histopathology       Date:  1991-11       Impact factor: 5.087

10.  Correlation of ultrasound findings with histology, tumor grade, and biological markers in breast cancer.

Authors:  Sung Hyun Kim; Bo Kyoung Seo; Juneyoung Lee; Seok Jin Kim; Kyu Ran Cho; Ki Yeol Lee; Bo-Kyung Je; Hee Young Kim; Young-Sik Kim; Ju-Han Lee
Journal:  Acta Oncol       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 4.089

View more
  12 in total

1.  Correlation between Ultrasound Findings of Tumor Margin and Clinicopathological Findings in Patients with Invasive Ductal Carcinoma of the Breast.

Authors:  Naoko Sannomiya; Yuiko Hattori; Naoyuki Ueda; Akira Kamida; Yuki Koyanagi; Haruki Nagira; Saeko Ikunishi; Kenta Shimabayashi; Yuki Hashimoto; Aya Murata; Kengo Sato; Yumi Hirooka; Keiko Hosoya; Kiyosuke Ishiguro; Yoko Murata; Yasuaki Hirooka
Journal:  Yonago Acta Med       Date:  2016-06-29       Impact factor: 1.641

2.  Adenoid cystic carcinoma of the breast: a study of five cases.

Authors:  Lixian Liu; Xi Lin; Huiling Xiang; Guoxue Tang; Chunyan Li
Journal:  J Radiol Case Rep       Date:  2020-11-30

3.  The role of ultrasonographic findings to predict molecular subtype, histologic grade, and hormone receptor status of breast cancer.

Authors:  Filiz Çelebi; Kezban Nur Pilancı; Çetin Ordu; Filiz Ağacayak; Gül Alço; Serkan İlgün; Dauren Sarsenov; Zeynep Erdoğan; Vahit Özmen
Journal:  Diagn Interv Radiol       Date:  2015 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.630

4.  Heterogeneity of triple-negative breast cancer: mammographic, US, and MR imaging features according to androgen receptor expression.

Authors:  Min Sun Bae; So Yeon Park; Sung Eun Song; Won Hwa Kim; Su Hyun Lee; Wonshik Han; In-Ae Park; Dong-Young Noh; Woo Kyung Moon
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2014-09-16       Impact factor: 5.315

5.  Computer-aided assessment of tumor grade for breast cancer in ultrasound images.

Authors:  Dar-Ren Chen; Cheng-Liang Chien; Yan-Fu Kuo
Journal:  Comput Math Methods Med       Date:  2015-02-24       Impact factor: 2.238

6.  The biology of malignant breast tumors has an impact on the presentation in ultrasound: an analysis of 315 cases.

Authors:  S Wojcinski; N Stefanidou; P Hillemanns; F Degenhardt
Journal:  BMC Womens Health       Date:  2013-11-19       Impact factor: 2.809

Review 7.  Molecular subtypes and imaging phenotypes of breast cancer.

Authors:  Nariya Cho
Journal:  Ultrasonography       Date:  2016-07-21

8.  Sonographic features of invasive ductal breast carcinomas predictive of malignancy grade.

Authors:  Kanika Gupta; Meenakshisundaram Kumaresan; Bhuvaneswari Venkatesan; Tushar Chandra; Aruna Patil; Maya Menon
Journal:  Indian J Radiol Imaging       Date:  2018 Jan-Mar

9.  Triple-negative invasive breast carcinoma: the association between the sonographic appearances with clinicopathological feature.

Authors:  Jia-Wei Li; Kai Zhang; Zhao-Ting Shi; Xun Zhang; Juan Xie; Jun-Ying Liu; Cai Chang
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-06-13       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  Association of sonographic features and molecular subtypes in predicting breast cancer disease outcomes.

Authors:  Haoyu Wang; Jiejie Yao; Ying Zhu; Weiwei Zhan; Xiaosong Chen; Kunwei Shen
Journal:  Cancer Med       Date:  2020-07-13       Impact factor: 4.452

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.