Literature DB >> 25224280

Predictive factors of scapular notching in patients with reverse shoulder arthroplasty.

N Bigorre1, R Lancigu2, P Bizot2, L Hubert2.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: The main complication of reverse shoulder arthroplasty is the development of notches in the scapular pillar, which occurs in 44% to 100% of cases. Furthermore the functional score has been shown to be poorer in patients with high-grade notches. Many options have been proposed to reduce this risk. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the predictive factors of the development of scapular notches.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively evaluated 133 shoulders in 121 patients with reverse shoulder arthroplasty. We performed a radiographic assessment of the effect of positioning the glenoid component with inferior overhang of the glenosphere and the glenometaphyseal angle. All patients were reviewed after 2years follow-up, including a clinical assessment based on the Constant score and X-rays to assess the presence of notches.
RESULTS: Nineteen complications were reported, and 14 required revision surgery. We excluded patients in whom prosthetic components were changed. The quality of the X-rays was not satisfactory enough to be analyzed in over 15 patients so they were excluded. One hundred five patients were reviewed. At 2years follow-up, 50.4% of shoulders presented with notches. The Constant score was 69.3 points (54-83) in shoulders without notches, and 66.4 points (38-82) in shoulders with notches. The average glenosphere overhang was 3.5mm (-1 - 8mm). Notches were present in 65.5% if it was less than 3mm and 39.6% if it was more than 2mm (P<0. 05). The average glenometaphyseal angle was 27.3° (4-59°), and notches developed in 72.2% if it was more than 28° and 26.5% if it was less than 28° (P<0.05).
CONCLUSION: The position of the metaglene influences the development of notches. The risk decreases if the glenosphere overhangs the glenoid. The degree of adduction of the arm influences the development of notches and can be correlated with the patient's BMI. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV retrospective study.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cuff tear arthropathy; Inferior scapular notching; Reverse shoulder arthroplasty

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25224280     DOI: 10.1016/j.otsr.2014.06.013

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Orthop Traumatol Surg Res        ISSN: 1877-0568            Impact factor:   2.256


  8 in total

Review 1.  Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty: Biomechanics and Indications.

Authors:  Caitlin M Rugg; Monica J Coughlan; Drew A Lansdown
Journal:  Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med       Date:  2019-12

2.  Clinical implications of scapular notching at 2 and 5-year follow-up after reverse total shoulder arthroplasty.

Authors:  Robert J Shelley; Mikalyn T DeFoor; Stephen A Parada; Lynn A Crosby
Journal:  J Orthop       Date:  2020-08-19

3.  Delta Xtend reverse shoulder arthroplasty - Results at a minimum of five years.

Authors:  Craig M Ball
Journal:  Shoulder Elbow       Date:  2019-03-06

Review 4.  Influence of Glenosphere Design on Outcomes and Complications of Reverse Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Cassandra Lawrence; Gerald R Williams; Surena Namdari
Journal:  Clin Orthop Surg       Date:  2016-08-10

5.  Effect of scapular notching on clinical outcomes after reverse total shoulder arthroplasty.

Authors:  Young Hoon Jang; Jeong Hyun Lee; Sae Hoon Kim
Journal:  Bone Joint J       Date:  2020-11       Impact factor: 5.082

Review 6.  The modern reverse shoulder arthroplasty and an updated systematic review for each complication: part I.

Authors:  Sarav S Shah; Benjamin T Gaal; Alexander M Roche; Surena Namdari; Brian M Grawe; Macy Lawler; Stewart Dalton; Joseph J King; Joshua Helmkamp; Grant E Garrigues; Thomas W Wright; Bradley S Schoch; Kyle Flik; Randall J Otto; Richard Jones; Andrew Jawa; Peter McCann; Joseph Abboud; Gabe Horneff; Glen Ross; Richard Friedman; Eric T Ricchetti; Douglas Boardman; Robert Z Tashjian; Lawrence V Gulotta
Journal:  JSES Int       Date:  2020-09-07

Review 7.  The modern reverse shoulder arthroplasty and an updated systematic review for each complication: part II.

Authors:  Sarav S Shah; Alexander M Roche; Spencer W Sullivan; Benjamin T Gaal; Stewart Dalton; Arjun Sharma; Joseph J King; Brian M Grawe; Surena Namdari; Macy Lawler; Joshua Helmkamp; Grant E Garrigues; Thomas W Wright; Bradley S Schoch; Kyle Flik; Randall J Otto; Richard Jones; Andrew Jawa; Peter McCann; Joseph Abboud; Gabe Horneff; Glen Ross; Richard Friedman; Eric T Ricchetti; Douglas Boardman; Robert Z Tashjian; Lawrence V Gulotta
Journal:  JSES Int       Date:  2020-09-10

8.  Complications and Intraoperative Fractures in Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Andrea Dolci; Barbara Melis; Marco Verona; Antonio Capone; Giuseppe Marongiu
Journal:  Geriatr Orthop Surg Rehabil       Date:  2021-12-08
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.