Literature DB >> 25224177

Different strategies underlying uncertain decision making: higher executive performance is associated with enhanced feedback-related negativity.

Andrea Kóbor1, Ádám Takács, Karolina Janacsek, Dezső Németh, Ferenc Honbolygó, Valéria Csépe.   

Abstract

The aim of the present study was to investigate the role of executive functions (EFs) in different strategies underlying risky decision making. Adult participants from a nonclinical sample were assigned to low or high EF groups based on their performance on EF tasks measuring shifting, updating, and inhibition. ERPs were recorded while participants performed the Balloon Analogue Risk Task (BART). In this task, each balloon pump was associated with either a reward or a balloon pop with unknown probability. The BART behavioral measures did not show between-group differences. However, the feedback-related negativity (FRN) associated with undesirable outcomes was larger in the high EF group than in the low EF group. Since the FRN represents salience prediction error, our results suggest that the high EF group formed internal models that were violated by the outcomes. Thus, we provided ERP evidence for EFs influencing risky decision-making processes.
© 2014 Society for Psychophysiological Research.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Balloon Analogue Risk Task; Decision making; Event-related brain potentials (ERPs); Executive functions; Feedback-related negativity; Model-based learning; Risk-taking behavior

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25224177     DOI: 10.1111/psyp.12331

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychophysiology        ISSN: 0048-5772            Impact factor:   4.016


  10 in total

1.  High sensation seeking is associated with behavioral and neural insensitivity to increased negative outcomes during decision-making under uncertainty.

Authors:  Sihua Xu; Lijuan Luo; Zhiguo Xiao; Ke Zhao; Hua Wang; Cencen Wang; Hengyi Rao
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2019-12       Impact factor: 3.282

2.  Adaptation to recent outcomes attenuates the lasting effect of initial experience on risky decisions.

Authors:  Andrea Kóbor; Zsófia Kardos; Ádám Takács; Noémi Éltető; Karolina Janacsek; Eszter Tóth-Fáber; Valéria Csépe; Dezso Nemeth
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-05-12       Impact factor: 4.379

3.  Escalating risk and the moderating effect of resistance to peer influence on the P200 and feedback-related negativity.

Authors:  John Kiat; Elizabeth Straley; Jacob E Cheadle
Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci       Date:  2015-09-28       Impact factor: 4.235

4.  Global-local visual processing impacts risk taking behaviors, but only at first.

Authors:  Stephen Wee Hun Lim; Alexander Y L Yuen; Eddie M W Tong
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2015-08-31

5.  Real and hypothetical monetary rewards modulate risk taking in the brain.

Authors:  Sihua Xu; Yu Pan; You Wang; Andrea M Spaeth; Zhe Qu; Hengyi Rao
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-07-07       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  Event-Related Potentials in Relation to Risk-Taking: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Dilushi Chandrakumar; Daniel Feuerriegel; Stefan Bode; Megan Grech; Hannah A D Keage
Journal:  Front Behav Neurosci       Date:  2018-06-19       Impact factor: 3.558

7.  Event-related potentials in response to feedback following risk-taking in the hot version of the Columbia Card Task.

Authors:  Kristel de Groot; Jan W van Strien
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  2019-05-08       Impact factor: 4.016

8.  Towards a Functional Neuromarker of Impulsivity: Feedback-Related Brain Potential during Risky Decision-Making Associated with Self-Reported Impulsivity in a Non-Clinical Sample.

Authors:  Juliana Teti Mayer; Charline Compagne; Magali Nicolier; Yohan Grandperrin; Thibault Chabin; Julie Giustiniani; Emmanuel Haffen; Djamila Bennabi; Damien Gabriel
Journal:  Brain Sci       Date:  2021-05-21

9.  Differential effects of real versus hypothetical monetary reward magnitude on risk-taking behavior and brain activity.

Authors:  Sihua Xu; Yu Pan; Zhe Qu; Zhuo Fang; Zijing Yang; Fan Yang; Fenghua Wang; Hengyi Rao
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-02-27       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  Enhanced switching and familial susceptibility for psychosis.

Authors:  Fred W Sabb; Gerhard Hellemann; Nicholas B Allen; Carrie E Bearden
Journal:  Brain Behav       Date:  2018-04-25       Impact factor: 2.708

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.