BACKGROUND: The value of simulation in medical education is increasingly obvious. Nevertheless, the high cost of running a simulation center and the time's availability for students to get to simulation center remain a major problem. Technological developments and miniaturization of computer systems now allow handling of simulation manikins. Therefore, "in situ" simulation seems a valuable alternative to center simulation. OBJECTIVE(S): To identify the costs and feasibility of "in situ" simulation. To conduct an evaluation of the sessions by participants in order to adapt the educational objectives. DESIGN: Observational study. SETTING: 118 "in situ" simulation sessions were organized between March 2011 and February 2013 in the university hospital of Université Catholique de Louvain. Sessions took place in OR facilities. At the end of each session, a questionnaire was given to each participant. PARTICIPANTS: 357 of 368 participants completed a questionnaire. For each session, one or two nurses and 2 residents in anesthesia were invited. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Total costs for organizing the sessions. Number of realized sessions. Global satisfaction of participants. RESULTS: Total cost for organizing the sessions is 18 414 Euro. One hundred and one among the 118 scheduled sessions were performed, which corresponds to a rate of 85%. Three hundred and sixty-five people participated in training simulations. During the sessions, 357 questionnaires were completed. The global satisfaction was high with a median Likert scale of 5 (5-5) to the question "I would like to participate in other sessions in the future". CONCLUSION: The "in situ" simulation in anesthesia is feasible in a university hospital using the available facilities of the operating theater during the working hours of both participants and trainers. However, the number of annual sessions may be limited by the availability of the simulation room or staff.
BACKGROUND: The value of simulation in medical education is increasingly obvious. Nevertheless, the high cost of running a simulation center and the time's availability for students to get to simulation center remain a major problem. Technological developments and miniaturization of computer systems now allow handling of simulation manikins. Therefore, "in situ" simulation seems a valuable alternative to center simulation. OBJECTIVE(S): To identify the costs and feasibility of "in situ" simulation. To conduct an evaluation of the sessions by participants in order to adapt the educational objectives. DESIGN: Observational study. SETTING: 118 "in situ" simulation sessions were organized between March 2011 and February 2013 in the university hospital of Université Catholique de Louvain. Sessions took place in OR facilities. At the end of each session, a questionnaire was given to each participant. PARTICIPANTS: 357 of 368 participants completed a questionnaire. For each session, one or two nurses and 2 residents in anesthesia were invited. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Total costs for organizing the sessions. Number of realized sessions. Global satisfaction of participants. RESULTS: Total cost for organizing the sessions is 18 414 Euro. One hundred and one among the 118 scheduled sessions were performed, which corresponds to a rate of 85%. Three hundred and sixty-five people participated in training simulations. During the sessions, 357 questionnaires were completed. The global satisfaction was high with a median Likert scale of 5 (5-5) to the question "I would like to participate in other sessions in the future". CONCLUSION: The "in situ" simulation in anesthesia is feasible in a university hospital using the available facilities of the operating theater during the working hours of both participants and trainers. However, the number of annual sessions may be limited by the availability of the simulation room or staff.
Authors: Matthew W Semler; Raj D Keriwala; Jennifer K Clune; Todd W Rice; Meredith E Pugh; Arthur P Wheeler; Alison N Miller; Arna Banerjee; Kyla Terhune; Julie A Bastarache Journal: Ann Am Thorac Soc Date: 2015-04
Authors: Barbara Casolla; Maria Alonso de Leciñana; Raquel Neves; Waltraud Pfeilschifter; Veronica Svobodova; Simon Jung; André Kemmling; Robert Mikulik; Paola Santalucia Journal: Eur Stroke J Date: 2020-11-01