Literature DB >> 25222633

Hospital costs of multiple-birth and singleton-birth children during the first 5 years of life and the role of assisted reproductive technology.

Georgina M Chambers1, Van Phuong Hoang1, Evelyn Lee1, Michele Hansen2, Elizabeth A Sullivan3, Carol Bower2, Michael Chapman4.   

Abstract

IMPORTANCE: The unprecedented increase in multiple births during the past 3 decades is a major public health concern and parallels the uptake of medically assisted conception. The economic implications of such births are not well understood.
OBJECTIVES: To conduct a comprehensive economic and health services assessment of the frequency, duration, and cost of hospital admissions during the first 5 years of life for singleton, twin, and higher-order multiple (HOM) children and to examine the contribution of assisted reproductive technology (ART) to the incidence and cost of multiple births. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: A retrospective population cohort study using individually linked birth, hospital, and death records among 233,850 infants born in Western Australia between October 1993 and September 2003, and followed up to September 2008. EXPOSURES: Multiple-gestation delivery and ART conception. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Odds of stillbirth, prematurity and low birth weight, frequency and length of hospital admissions, the mean costs by plurality, and the independent effect of prematurity on childhood costs.
RESULTS: Of 226,624 singleton, 6941 twin, and 285 HOM infants, 1.0% of singletons, 15.4% of twins, and 34.7% of HOM children were conceived following ART. Compared with singletons, twins and HOMs were 3.4 and 9.6 times, respectively, more likely to be stillborn and were 6.4 and 36.7 times, respectively, more likely to die during the neonatal period. Twins and HOMs were 18.7 and 525.1 times, respectively, more likely to be preterm, and 3.6 and 2.8 times, respectively, more likely to be small for gestational age. The mean hospital costs of a singleton, twin, and HOM child to age 5 years were $2730, $8993, and $24,411 (in 2009-2010 US dollars), respectively, with cost differences concentrated in the neonatal period and during the first year of life. Almost 15% of inpatient costs for multiple births could have been avoided if ART twins and HOMs had been born as singletons. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Compared with singletons, multiple-birth infants consume significantly more hospital resources, particularly during the neonatal period and first year of life. A significant proportion of the clinical and economic burden associated with multiple births can be prevented through single-embryo transfer. Increasing ART use worldwide and persistently high ART multiple-birth rates in several countries highlight the need for strategies that encourage single-embryo transfer. The costs from this study can be generalized to other settings.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25222633     DOI: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2014.1357

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JAMA Pediatr        ISSN: 2168-6203            Impact factor:   16.193


  15 in total

1.  Identification of Common Genetic Variants Influencing Spontaneous Dizygotic Twinning and Female Fertility.

Authors:  Hamdi Mbarek; Stacy Steinberg; Dale R Nyholt; Scott D Gordon; Michael B Miller; Allan F McRae; Jouke Jan Hottenga; Felix R Day; Gonneke Willemsen; Eco J de Geus; Gareth E Davies; Hilary C Martin; Brenda W Penninx; Rick Jansen; Kerrie McAloney; Jacqueline M Vink; Jaakko Kaprio; Robert Plomin; Tim D Spector; Patrik K Magnusson; Bruno Reversade; R Alan Harris; Kjersti Aagaard; Ragnar P Kristjansson; Isleifur Olafsson; Gudmundur Ingi Eyjolfsson; Olof Sigurdardottir; William G Iacono; Cornelis B Lambalk; Grant W Montgomery; Matt McGue; Ken K Ong; John R B Perry; Nicholas G Martin; Hreinn Stefánsson; Kari Stefánsson; Dorret I Boomsma
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2016-04-28       Impact factor: 11.025

2.  Twin Births in Medicaid: Prevalence, Outcomes, Utilization, and Cost in Four States, 2014-2015.

Authors:  Embry M Howell; Paul Johnson; Caitlin Cross-Barnet
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2020-05

3.  Diagnosis-Related Group Weight and Derived Case Mix Index to Assess the Complexity among Twins.

Authors:  Rikizam M Joya; Lesley Cottrell; Autumn Kiefer; Mark J Polak
Journal:  Am J Perinatol       Date:  2020-12-30       Impact factor: 3.079

4.  Accounting for past patient composition in evaluations of quality reporting.

Authors:  Katherine I Tierney; Samuel Fishman
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2022-02-03       Impact factor: 3.734

5.  Economic value of in vitro fertilization in Ukraine, Belarus, and Kazakhstan.

Authors:  Olena Mandrik; Saskia Knies; Johan L Severens
Journal:  Clinicoecon Outcomes Res       Date:  2015-06-12

6.  Pregnant after assisted reproduction: a risk pregnancy is born! 18-years perinatal outcome results from a population-based registry in Flanders, Belgium.

Authors:  W Ombelet; G Martens; L Bruckers
Journal:  Facts Views Vis Obgyn       Date:  2016-12

7.  Is mandating elective single embryo transfer ethically justifiable in young women?

Authors:  Kelton Tremellen; Dominic Wilkinson; Julian Savulescu
Journal:  Reprod Biomed Soc Online       Date:  2016-02-18

Review 8.  Availability, effectiveness and safety of ART in sub-Saharan Africa: a systematic review.

Authors:  Barend Botha; Delva Shamley; Silke Dyer
Journal:  Hum Reprod Open       Date:  2018-03-26

9.  Length of stay and cost of birth hospitalization: effects of subfertility and ART.

Authors:  Dmitry Dukhovny; Sunah S Hwang; Daksha Gopal; Howard Cabral; Stacey Missmer; Hafsatou Diop; Eugene Declercq; Judy E Stern
Journal:  J Perinatol       Date:  2018-08-30       Impact factor: 2.521

10.  Pregnancy outcomes of dichorionic triamniotic triplet pregnancies after in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer: multifoetal pregnancy reduction versus expectant management.

Authors:  Pei Cai; Yan Ouyang; Fei Gong; Xihong Li
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2020-03-17       Impact factor: 3.007

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.