Literature DB >> 25222154

Repair of single-point mutations by polypurine reverse Hoogsteen hairpins.

Anna Solé1, Xenia Villalobos, Carlos J Ciudad, Véronique Noé.   

Abstract

Polypurine reverse Hoogsteen hairpins (PPRHs) are formed by two intramolecularly bound antiparallel homopurine domains linked by a five-thymidine loop. One of the homopurine strands binds with antiparallel orientation by Watson-Crick bonds to the polypyrimidine target sequence, forming a triplex. We had previously reported the ability of PPRHs to effectively bind dsDNA displacing the fourth strand away from the newly formed triplex. The main goal of this work was to explore the possibility of repairing a point mutation in mammalian cells using PPRHs as tools. These repair-PPRHs contain different combinations of extended sequences of DNA with the corrected nucleotide to repair the point mutation. As a model we used the dihydrofolate reductase gene. On the one hand, we demonstrate in vitro that PPRHs bind specifically to their polypyrimidine target sequence, opening the two strands of the dsDNA, and allowing the binding of a given repair oligonucleotide to the displaced strand of the DNA. Subsequently, we show at a cellular level (Chinese ovary hamster cells) that repair-PPRHs are able to correct a single-point mutation in a dihydrofolate reductase minigene bearing a nonsense mutation, both in an extrachromosomal location and when the mutated plasmid was stably transfected into the cells. Finally, this methodology was successfully applied to repair a single-point mutation at the endogenous locus, using the DA5 cell line with a deleted nucleotide in exon six of the dhfr gene.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25222154      PMCID: PMC4208591          DOI: 10.1089/hgtb.2014.049

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Gene Ther Methods        ISSN: 1946-6536            Impact factor:   2.396


  54 in total

1.  Triplex-induced recombination in human cell-free extracts. Dependence on XPA and HsRad51.

Authors:  H J Datta; P P Chan; K M Vasquez; R C Gupta; P M Glazer
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2001-02-27       Impact factor: 5.157

Review 2.  Oligonucleotide-directed gene-editing technology: mechanisms and future prospects.

Authors:  Ioannis Papaioannou; J Paul Simons; James S Owen
Journal:  Expert Opin Biol Ther       Date:  2012-02-10       Impact factor: 4.388

Review 3.  RNA-guided genetic silencing systems in bacteria and archaea.

Authors:  Blake Wiedenheft; Samuel H Sternberg; Jennifer A Doudna
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2012-02-15       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 4.  Genome editing with engineered zinc finger nucleases.

Authors:  Fyodor D Urnov; Edward J Rebar; Michael C Holmes; H Steve Zhang; Philip D Gregory
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 53.242

5.  Monomeric site-specific nucleases for genome editing.

Authors:  Benjamin P Kleinstiver; Jason M Wolfs; Tomasz Kolaczyk; Alanna K Roberts; Sherry X Hu; David R Edgell
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2012-05-07       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Efficient CRISPR/Cas9 genome editing with low off-target effects in zebrafish.

Authors:  Alexander Hruscha; Peter Krawitz; Alexandra Rechenberg; Verena Heinrich; Jochen Hecht; Christian Haass; Bettina Schmid
Journal:  Development       Date:  2013-11-20       Impact factor: 6.868

7.  Mechanism of escape from nonsense-mediated mRNA decay of human beta-globin transcripts with nonsense mutations in the first exon.

Authors:  Gabriele Neu-Yilik; Beate Amthor; Niels H Gehring; Sharif Bahri; Helena Paidassi; Matthias W Hentze; Andreas E Kulozik
Journal:  RNA       Date:  2011-03-09       Impact factor: 4.942

8.  Targeted genome editing across species using ZFNs and TALENs.

Authors:  Andrew J Wood; Te-Wen Lo; Bryan Zeitler; Catherine S Pickle; Edward J Ralston; Andrew H Lee; Rainier Amora; Jeffrey C Miller; Elo Leung; Xiangdong Meng; Lei Zhang; Edward J Rebar; Philip D Gregory; Fyodor D Urnov; Barbara J Meyer
Journal:  Science       Date:  2011-06-23       Impact factor: 47.728

9.  Polypurine reverse Hoogsteen hairpins as a gene therapy tool against survivin in human prostate cancer PC3 cells in vitro and in vivo.

Authors:  Laura Rodríguez; Xenia Villalobos; Sheila Dakhel; Laura Padilla; Rosa Hervas; Jose Luis Hernández; Carlos J Ciudad; Véronique Noé
Journal:  Biochem Pharmacol       Date:  2013-09-23       Impact factor: 5.858

10.  Understanding oligonucleotide-mediated inhibition of gene expression in Xenopus laevis oocytes.

Authors:  C Bailey; D L Weeks
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2000-03-01       Impact factor: 16.971

View more
  2 in total

1.  Polypurine reverse-Hoogsteen (PPRH) oligonucleotides can form triplexes with their target sequences even under conditions where they fold into G-quadruplexes.

Authors:  Anna Solé; Emmanuelle Delagoutte; Carlos J Ciudad; Véronique Noé; Patrizia Alberti
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-01-09       Impact factor: 4.379

2.  Correction of the aprt Gene Using Repair-Polypurine Reverse Hoogsteen Hairpins in Mammalian Cells.

Authors:  Alex J Félix; Carlos J Ciudad; Véronique Noé
Journal:  Mol Ther Nucleic Acids       Date:  2019-12-24       Impact factor: 8.886

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.