Literature DB >> 25221383

The Uncanny Valley Does Not Interfere with Level 1 Visual Perspective Taking.

Karl F MacDorman1, Preethi Srinivas1, Himalaya Patel1.   

Abstract

When a computer-animated human character looks eerily realistic, viewers report a loss of empathy; they have difficulty taking the character's perspective. To explain this perspective-taking impairment, known as the uncanny valley, a novel theory is proposed: The more human or less eerie a character looks, the more it interferes with level 1 visual perspective taking when the character's perspective differs from that of the human observer (e.g., because the character competitively activates shared circuits in the observer's brain). The proposed theory is evaluated in three experiments involving a dot-counting task in which participants either assumed or ignored the perspective of characters varying in their human photorealism and eeriness. Although response times and error rates were lower when the number of dots faced by the observer and character were the same (congruent condition) than when they were different (incongruent condition), no consistent pattern emerged between the human photorealism or eeriness of the characters and participants' response times and error rates. Thus, the proposed theory is unsupported for level 1 visual perspective taking. As the effects of the uncanny valley on empathy have not previously been investigated systematically, these results provide evidence to eliminate one possible explanation.

Entities:  

Keywords:  anthropomorphism; character animation; cognitive empathy; mirror neuron system; theory of mind

Year:  2013        PMID: 25221383      PMCID: PMC4160743          DOI: 10.1016/j.chb.2013.01.051

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Comput Human Behav        ISSN: 0747-5632


  27 in total

1.  Attractiveness of facial averageness and symmetry in non-western cultures: in search of biologically based standards of beauty.

Authors:  G Rhodes; S Yoshikawa; A Clark; K Lee; R McKay; S Akamatsu
Journal:  Perception       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 1.490

Review 2.  Mind blindness and the brain in autism.

Authors:  U Frith
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2001-12-20       Impact factor: 17.173

3.  Neural mechanisms of empathy in humans: a relay from neural systems for imitation to limbic areas.

Authors:  Laurie Carr; Marco Iacoboni; Marie-Charlotte Dubeau; John C Mazziotta; Gian Luigi Lenzi
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2003-04-07       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Understanding and using the implicit association test: I. An improved scoring algorithm.

Authors:  Anthony G Greenwald; Brian A Nosek; Mahzarin R Banaji
Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol       Date:  2003-08

5.  Shared neural circuits for mentalizing about the self and others.

Authors:  Michael V Lombardo; Bhismadev Chakrabarti; Edward T Bullmore; Sally J Wheelwright; Susan A Sadek; John Suckling; Simon Baron-Cohen
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 3.225

6.  Seeing it their way: evidence for rapid and involuntary computation of what other people see.

Authors:  Dana Samson; Ian A Apperly; Jason J Braithwaite; Benjamin J Andrews; Sarah E Bodley Scott
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 3.332

7.  Empathy and judging other's pain: an fMRI study of alexithymia.

Authors:  Yoshiya Moriguchi; Jean Decety; Takashi Ohnishi; Motonari Maeda; Takeyuki Mori; Kiyotaka Nemoto; Hiroshi Matsuda; Gen Komaki
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2006-12-05       Impact factor: 5.357

8.  Is emotional contagion special? An fMRI study on neural systems for affective and cognitive empathy.

Authors:  Lauri Nummenmaa; Jussi Hirvonen; Riitta Parkkola; Jari K Hietanen
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2008-08-26       Impact factor: 6.556

9.  The autistic child's theory of mind: a case of specific developmental delay.

Authors:  S Baron-Cohen
Journal:  J Child Psychol Psychiatry       Date:  1989-03       Impact factor: 8.982

10.  The empathic brain and its dysfunction in psychiatric populations: implications for intervention across different clinical conditions.

Authors:  Jean Decety; Yoshiya Moriguchi
Journal:  Biopsychosoc Med       Date:  2007-11-16
View more
  5 in total

1.  Persistence of the uncanny valley: the influence of repeated interactions and a robot's attitude on its perception.

Authors:  Jakub A Złotowski; Hidenobu Sumioka; Shuichi Nishio; Dylan F Glas; Christoph Bartneck; Hiroshi Ishiguro
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2015-06-30

2.  Perceptual discrimination difficulty and familiarity in the Uncanny Valley: more like a "Happy Valley".

Authors:  Marcus Cheetham; Pascal Suter; Lutz Jancke
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2014-11-19

3.  Those Virtual People all Look the Same to me: Computer-Rendered Faces Elicit a Higher False Alarm Rate Than Real Human Faces in a Recognition Memory Task.

Authors:  Jari Kätsyri
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2018-08-03

Review 4.  A review of empirical evidence on different uncanny valley hypotheses: support for perceptual mismatch as one road to the valley of eeriness.

Authors:  Jari Kätsyri; Klaus Förger; Meeri Mäkäräinen; Tapio Takala
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2015-04-10

5.  Arousal, valence, and the uncanny valley: psychophysiological and self-report findings.

Authors:  Marcus Cheetham; Lingdan Wu; Paul Pauli; Lutz Jancke
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2015-07-15
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.