Roel G J Kierkels1, Erik W Korevaar2, Roel J H M Steenbakkers2, Tomas Janssen3, Aart A van't Veld2, Johannes A Langendijk2, Cornelis Schilstra4, Arjen van der Schaaf2. 1. University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Department of Radiation Oncology, The Netherlands. Electronic address: R.G.J.Kierkels@umcg.nl. 2. University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Department of Radiation Oncology, The Netherlands. 3. Department of Radiation Oncology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. 4. University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Department of Radiation Oncology, The Netherlands; Radiotherapeutic Institute Friesland, Leeuwarden, The Netherlands.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Recently, clinically validated multivariable normal tissue complication probability models (NTCP) for head and neck cancer (HNC) patients have become available. We test the feasibility of using multivariable NTCP-models directly in the optimiser for inverse treatment planning of radiotherapy to improve the dose distributions and corresponding NTCP-estimates in HNC patients. MATERIAL AND METHODS: For 10 HNC cases, intensity-modulated radiotherapy plans were optimised either using objective functions based on the 'generalised equivalent uniform dose' (OFgEUD) or based on multivariable NTCP-models (OFNTCP). NTCP-models for patient-rated xerostomia, physician-rated RTOG grade II-IV dysphagia, and various patient-rated aspects of swallowing dysfunction were incorporated. The NTCP-models included dose-volume parameters as well as clinical factors contributing to a personalised optimisation process. Both optimisation techniques were compared by means of 'pseudo Pareto fronts' (target dose conformity vs. the sum of the NTCPs). RESULTS: Both optimisation techniques resulted in clinically realistic treatment plans with only small differences. For nine patients the sum-NTCP was lower for the OFNTCP optimised plans (on average 5.7% (95%CI 1.7-9.9%, p<0.006)). Furthermore, the OFNTCP provided the advantages of fewer unknown optimisation parameters and an intrinsic mechanism of individualisation. CONCLUSIONS: Treatment plan optimisation using multivariable NTCP-models directly in the OF is feasible as has been demonstrated for HNC radiotherapy.
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Recently, clinically validated multivariable normal tissue complication probability models (NTCP) for head and neck cancer (HNC) patients have become available. We test the feasibility of using multivariable NTCP-models directly in the optimiser for inverse treatment planning of radiotherapy to improve the dose distributions and corresponding NTCP-estimates in HNC patients. MATERIAL AND METHODS: For 10 HNC cases, intensity-modulated radiotherapy plans were optimised either using objective functions based on the 'generalised equivalent uniform dose' (OFgEUD) or based on multivariable NTCP-models (OFNTCP). NTCP-models for patient-rated xerostomia, physician-rated RTOG grade II-IV dysphagia, and various patient-rated aspects of swallowing dysfunction were incorporated. The NTCP-models included dose-volume parameters as well as clinical factors contributing to a personalised optimisation process. Both optimisation techniques were compared by means of 'pseudo Pareto fronts' (target dose conformity vs. the sum of the NTCPs). RESULTS: Both optimisation techniques resulted in clinically realistic treatment plans with only small differences. For nine patients the sum-NTCP was lower for the OFNTCP optimised plans (on average 5.7% (95%CI 1.7-9.9%, p<0.006)). Furthermore, the OFNTCP provided the advantages of fewer unknown optimisation parameters and an intrinsic mechanism of individualisation. CONCLUSIONS: Treatment plan optimisation using multivariable NTCP-models directly in the OF is feasible as has been demonstrated for HNC radiotherapy.
Authors: Jay A Messer; Abdallah S R Mohamed; Katherine A Hutcheson; Yao Ding; Jan S Lewin; Jihong Wang; Stephen Y Lai; Steven J Frank; Adam S Garden; Vlad Sandulache; Hillary Eichelberger; Chloe C French; Rivka R Colen; Jack Phan; Jayashree Kalpathy-Cramer; John D Hazle; David I Rosenthal; G Brandon Gunn; Clifton D Fuller Journal: Radiother Oncol Date: 2016-01-28 Impact factor: 6.280
Authors: Roel G J Kierkels; Ruurd Visser; Hendrik P Bijl; Johannes A Langendijk; Aart A van 't Veld; Roel J H M Steenbakkers; Erik W Korevaar Journal: Radiat Oncol Date: 2015-04-12 Impact factor: 3.481
Authors: Jamie A Dean; Kee H Wong; Liam C Welsh; Ann-Britt Jones; Ulrike Schick; Kate L Newbold; Shreerang A Bhide; Kevin J Harrington; Christopher M Nutting; Sarah L Gulliford Journal: Radiother Oncol Date: 2016-05-27 Impact factor: 6.280
Authors: Laura Ann Rechner; Arezoo Modiri; Line Bjerregaard Stick; Maja V Maraldo; Marianne C Aznar; Stephanie R Rice; Amit Sawant; Søren M Bentzen; Ivan Richter Vogelius; Lena Specht Journal: Acta Oncol Date: 2020-03-27 Impact factor: 4.089