Jamie A Dean1, Kee H Wong2, Liam C Welsh2, Ann-Britt Jones2, Ulrike Schick2, Kate L Newbold3, Shreerang A Bhide3, Kevin J Harrington3, Christopher M Nutting3, Sarah L Gulliford4. 1. Joint Department of Physics at The Institute of Cancer Research and The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK. Electronic address: jamie.dean@icr.ac.uk. 2. The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK. 3. The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK; The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK. 4. Joint Department of Physics at The Institute of Cancer Research and The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Severe acute mucositis commonly results from head and neck (chemo)radiotherapy. A predictive model of mucositis could guide clinical decision-making and inform treatment planning. We aimed to generate such a model using spatial dose metrics and machine learning. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Predictive models of severe acute mucositis were generated using radiotherapy dose (dose-volume and spatial dose metrics) and clinical data. Penalised logistic regression, support vector classification and random forest classification (RFC) models were generated and compared. Internal validation was performed (with 100-iteration cross-validation), using multiple metrics, including area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) and calibration slope, to assess performance. Associations between covariates and severe mucositis were explored using the models. RESULTS: The dose-volume-based models (standard) performed equally to those incorporating spatial information. Discrimination was similar between models, but the RFCstandard had the best calibration. The mean AUC and calibration slope for this model were 0.71 (s.d.=0.09) and 3.9 (s.d.=2.2), respectively. The volumes of oral cavity receiving intermediate and high doses were associated with severe mucositis. CONCLUSIONS: The RFCstandard model performance is modest-to-good, but should be improved, and requires external validation. Reducing the volumes of oral cavity receiving intermediate and high doses may reduce mucositis incidence.
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Severe acute mucositis commonly results from head and neck (chemo)radiotherapy. A predictive model of mucositis could guide clinical decision-making and inform treatment planning. We aimed to generate such a model using spatial dose metrics and machine learning. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Predictive models of severe acute mucositis were generated using radiotherapy dose (dose-volume and spatial dose metrics) and clinical data. Penalised logistic regression, support vector classification and random forest classification (RFC) models were generated and compared. Internal validation was performed (with 100-iteration cross-validation), using multiple metrics, including area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) and calibration slope, to assess performance. Associations between covariates and severe mucositis were explored using the models. RESULTS: The dose-volume-based models (standard) performed equally to those incorporating spatial information. Discrimination was similar between models, but the RFCstandard had the best calibration. The mean AUC and calibration slope for this model were 0.71 (s.d.=0.09) and 3.9 (s.d.=2.2), respectively. The volumes of oral cavity receiving intermediate and high doses were associated with severe mucositis. CONCLUSIONS: The RFCstandard model performance is modest-to-good, but should be improved, and requires external validation. Reducing the volumes of oral cavity receiving intermediate and high doses may reduce mucositis incidence.
Authors: Florian Buettner; Sarah L Gulliford; Steve Webb; Matthew R Sydes; David P Dearnaley; Mike Partridge Journal: Radiother Oncol Date: 2012-04-18 Impact factor: 6.280
Authors: A G Robertson; C Robertson; C Perone; K Clarke; J Dewar; M H Elia; D Hurman; R H MacDougall; H M Yosef Journal: Radiother Oncol Date: 1998-08 Impact factor: 6.280
Authors: Kim Wopken; Hendrik P Bijl; Arjen van der Schaaf; Hans Paul van der Laan; Olga Chouvalova; Roel J H M Steenbakkers; Patricia Doornaert; Ben J Slotman; Sjoukje F Oosting; Miranda E M C Christianen; Bernard F A M van der Laan; Jan L N Roodenburg; C René Leemans; Irma M Verdonck-de Leeuw; Johannes A Langendijk Journal: Radiother Oncol Date: 2014-10-16 Impact factor: 6.280
Authors: Shreerang A Bhide; Sarah Gulliford; Jack Fowler; Nicola Rosenfelder; Katie Newbold; Kevin J Harrington; Christopher M Nutting Journal: Radiother Oncol Date: 2010-09-07 Impact factor: 6.280
Authors: Ewout W Steyerberg; Andrew J Vickers; Nancy R Cook; Thomas Gerds; Mithat Gonen; Nancy Obuchowski; Michael J Pencina; Michael W Kattan Journal: Epidemiology Date: 2010-01 Impact factor: 4.822
Authors: Andy Trotti; Lisa A Bellm; Joel B Epstein; Diana Frame; Henry J Fuchs; Clement K Gwede; Eugene Komaroff; Luba Nalysnyk; Marya D Zilberberg Journal: Radiother Oncol Date: 2003-03 Impact factor: 6.280
Authors: A B Miah; U Schick; S A Bhide; M-T Guerrero-Urbano; C H Clark; A M Bidmead; S Bodla; L Del Rosario; K Thway; P Wilson; K L Newbold; K J Harrington; C M Nutting Journal: Br J Cancer Date: 2014-12-04 Impact factor: 7.640
Authors: J A Dean; L C Welsh; K H Wong; A Aleksic; E Dunne; M R Islam; A Patel; P Patel; I Petkar; I Phillips; J Sham; U Schick; K L Newbold; S A Bhide; K J Harrington; C M Nutting; S L Gulliford Journal: Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol) Date: 2017-01-03 Impact factor: 4.126
Authors: Elizabeth Huynh; Ahmed Hosny; Christian Guthier; Danielle S Bitterman; Steven F Petit; Daphne A Haas-Kogan; Benjamin Kann; Hugo J W L Aerts; Raymond H Mak Journal: Nat Rev Clin Oncol Date: 2020-08-25 Impact factor: 66.675
Authors: N Patrik Brodin; Rafi Kabarriti; Mark Pankuch; Clyde B Schechter; Vinai Gondi; Shalom Kalnicki; Chandan Guha; Madhur K Garg; Wolfgang A Tomé Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 2018-11-26 Impact factor: 7.038
Authors: Ana Barragán-Montero; Umair Javaid; Gilmer Valdés; Dan Nguyen; Paul Desbordes; Benoit Macq; Siri Willems; Liesbeth Vandewinckele; Mats Holmström; Fredrik Löfman; Steven Michiels; Kevin Souris; Edmond Sterpin; John A Lee Journal: Phys Med Date: 2021-05-09 Impact factor: 2.685