BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Propofol is a widely used intravenous anaesthetic agent, but has undesirable cardiac side effects, including bradyarrhythmia and its severe form asystole. This study examined the ionic and cellular mechanisms underlying propofol-induced bradycardia. EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH: Sinoatrial node cells, isolated from guinea pig hearts, were current- and voltage-clamped to record action potentials and major ionic currents involved in their spontaneous activity, such as the hyperpolarization-activated cation current (If ), T-type and L-type Ca(2+) currents (ICa,T and ICa,L , respectively) and the rapidly and slowly activating delayed rectifier K(+) currents (IKr and IK s , respectively). ECGs were recorded from Langendorff-perfused, isolated guinea pig hearts. KEY RESULTS: Propofol (≥5 μM) reversibly decreased the firing rate of spontaneous action potentials and their diastolic depolarization rate. Propofol impaired If activation by shifting the voltage-dependent activation to more hyperpolarized potentials (≥1 μM), slowing the activation kinetics (≥3 μM) and decreasing the maximal conductance (≥10 μM). Propofol decreased ICa,T (≥3 μM) and ICa,L (≥1 μM). Propofol suppressed IKs (≥3 μM), but had a minimal effect on IKr . Furthermore, propofol (≥5 μM) decreased heart rates in Langendorff-perfused hearts. The sinoatrial node cell model reasonably well reproduced the negative chronotropic action of propofol. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: Micromolar concentrations of propofol suppressed the slow diastolic depolarization and firing rate of sinoatrial node action potentials by impairing If activation and reducing ICa,T , ICa,L and IKs . These observations suggest that the direct inhibitory effect of propofol on sinoatrial node automaticity, mediated via multiple channel inhibition, underlies the propofol-induced bradycardia observed in clinical settings.
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE:Propofol is a widely used intravenous anaesthetic agent, but has undesirable cardiac side effects, including bradyarrhythmia and its severe form asystole. This study examined the ionic and cellular mechanisms underlying propofol-induced bradycardia. EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH: Sinoatrial node cells, isolated from guinea pig hearts, were current- and voltage-clamped to record action potentials and major ionic currents involved in their spontaneous activity, such as the hyperpolarization-activated cation current (If ), T-type and L-type Ca(2+) currents (ICa,T and ICa,L , respectively) and the rapidly and slowly activating delayed rectifier K(+) currents (IKr and IK s , respectively). ECGs were recorded from Langendorff-perfused, isolated guinea pig hearts. KEY RESULTS:Propofol (≥5 μM) reversibly decreased the firing rate of spontaneous action potentials and their diastolic depolarization rate. Propofol impaired If activation by shifting the voltage-dependent activation to more hyperpolarized potentials (≥1 μM), slowing the activation kinetics (≥3 μM) and decreasing the maximal conductance (≥10 μM). Propofoldecreased ICa,T (≥3 μM) and ICa,L (≥1 μM). Propofol suppressed IKs (≥3 μM), but had a minimal effect on IKr . Furthermore, propofol (≥5 μM) decreased heart rates in Langendorff-perfused hearts. The sinoatrial node cell model reasonably well reproduced the negative chronotropic action of propofol. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: Micromolar concentrations of propofol suppressed the slow diastolic depolarization and firing rate of sinoatrial node action potentials by impairing If activation and reducing ICa,T , ICa,L and IKs . These observations suggest that the direct inhibitory effect of propofol on sinoatrial node automaticity, mediated via multiple channel inhibition, underlies the propofol-induced bradycardia observed in clinical settings.
Authors: Matteo E Mangoni; Brigitte Couette; Emmanuel Bourinet; Josef Platzer; Daniel Reimer; Jörg Striessnig; Joël Nargeot Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2003-04-16 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Stephen P H Alexander; Helen E Benson; Elena Faccenda; Adam J Pawson; Joanna L Sharman; Michael Spedding; John A Peters; Anthony J Harmar Journal: Br J Pharmacol Date: 2013-12 Impact factor: 8.739
Authors: Stephen P H Alexander; Helen E Benson; Elena Faccenda; Adam J Pawson; Joanna L Sharman; William A Catterall; Michael Spedding; John A Peters; Anthony J Harmar Journal: Br J Pharmacol Date: 2013-12 Impact factor: 8.739