Literature DB >> 2521841

Reduced suppressor cell response to Mycobacterium leprae in lepromatous leprosy.

M D Sasiain1, S de la Barrera, R Valdez, L M Balina.   

Abstract

We have previously shown that concanavalin A (ConA) induction of suppressor cell activity is impaired in patients with lepromatous leprosy (LL). In this study, we demonstrated that the proportion of cells bearing the Leu8 antigen (associated with suppressor-inducer cells) is low in LL patients and tends to normalize during the erythema nodosum leprosum (ENL) episode. Antigen-induced suppressor cell function was evaluated by a two-stage assay. In the first stage, peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) were cultured for 5 days either in the presence of gamma-irradiated Mycobacterium leprae or in tissue culture medium as a control. In the second stage, mitomycin C-treated suppressor or control cells were added to phytohemagglutinin (PHA)- or ConA-stimulated autologous PBMC. The results indicate that the ability of M. leprae to induce suppressor activity was lower in LL patients than in patients with tuberculoid (TT) and intermediate clinical (BB, BL, BT) forms and Mycobacterium bovis BCG-immunized normal controls. In ENL patients, the percent suppression was between that of TT and normal individuals. M. leprae-induced suppression was more effective on ConA- than on PHA-triggered T-cell proliferation in all groups. In contrast, normal PBMC cultured for 5 days in RPMI 1640 medium (N-C) and cells from patients with leprosy (TT-C and LL-C) had effects of their own on PHA- or ConA-induced proliferation. LL-C depressed the response to ConA and enhanced PHA-induced proliferation of autologous cells. Conversely, TT-C reduced PHA-induced proliferation and increased the ConA response. Suppression of proliferation could not be overcome with exogenous interleukin-2 and was not related to the induction of the Tac antigen. The abilities of LL, TT, ENL, and normal cells to proliferate upon PHA or ConA stimulus were similar, indicating that the defect in the generation of in vitro suppression by M. leprae in LL patients occurred during the induction period (step 1 of assay).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2521841      PMCID: PMC313204          DOI: 10.1128/iai.57.3.951-956.1989

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Infect Immun        ISSN: 0019-9567            Impact factor:   3.441


  36 in total

1.  Lepromin-induced suppressor cells in patients with leprosy.

Authors:  V Mehra; L H Mason; J P Fields; B R Bloom
Journal:  J Immunol       Date:  1979-10       Impact factor: 5.422

2.  A one-stage procedure for isolation of granulocytes and lymphocytes from human blood. General sedimentation properties of white blood cells in a 1g gravity field.

Authors:  A Böyum
Journal:  Scand J Clin Lab Invest Suppl       Date:  1968

3.  Soluble antigen-primed inducer T cells activate antigen-specific suppressor T cells in the absence of antigen-pulsed accessory cells: phenotypic definition of suppressor-inducer and suppressor-effector cells.

Authors:  N K Damle; N Mohagheghpour; E G Engleman
Journal:  J Immunol       Date:  1984-02       Impact factor: 5.422

4.  In vitro induction of human suppressor T cells by mycobacterial antigens. BCG activated OKT4+ cells mediate suppression of antigen induced T cell proliferation.

Authors:  A S Mustafa; T Godal
Journal:  Clin Exp Immunol       Date:  1983-04       Impact factor: 4.330

5.  Characterization of the cellular immune defect in lepromatous leprosy: a specific lack of circulating Mycobacterium leprae-reactive lymphocytes.

Authors:  T Godal; B Myklestad; D R Samuel; B Myrvang
Journal:  Clin Exp Immunol       Date:  1971-12       Impact factor: 4.330

6.  Lymphocyte suppression in leprosy induced by unique M. leprae glycolipid.

Authors:  V Mehra; P J Brennan; E Rada; J Convit; B R Bloom
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1984 Mar 8-14       Impact factor: 49.962

7.  Lymphocyte transformation test in leprosy: decreased lymphocyte reactivity to Mycobacterium leprae in lepromatous leprosy, with no evidence for a generalized impairment.

Authors:  W R Faber; D L Leiker; I M Nengerman; W P Zeijlemaker; P T Schellekens
Journal:  Infect Immun       Date:  1978-12       Impact factor: 3.441

8.  Functional characterization of human T lymphocyte subsets distinguished by monoclonal anti-leu-8.

Authors:  G S Kansas; G S Wood; D M Fishwild; E G Engleman
Journal:  J Immunol       Date:  1985-05       Impact factor: 5.422

9.  Concanavalin-A-activated lymphocytes suppress immune responses in vitro but are helper cells in vivo.

Authors:  G Möller
Journal:  Scand J Immunol       Date:  1985-01       Impact factor: 3.487

10.  An analysis of in vitro T cell responsiveness in lepromatous leprosy.

Authors:  G Kaplan; D E Weinstein; R M Steinman; W R Levis; U Elvers; M E Patarroyo; Z A Cohn
Journal:  J Exp Med       Date:  1985-09-01       Impact factor: 14.307

View more
  2 in total

1.  Changes in cellular response to mycobacterial antigens and cytokine production patterns in leprosy patients during multiple drug therapy.

Authors:  V T Trao; P L Huong; A T Thuan; D D Anh; D D Trach; G A Rook; E P Wright
Journal:  Immunology       Date:  1998-06       Impact factor: 7.397

Review 2.  A Systematic Review of Immunological Studies of Erythema Nodosum Leprosum.

Authors:  Anastasia Polycarpou; Stephen L Walker; Diana N J Lockwood
Journal:  Front Immunol       Date:  2017-03-13       Impact factor: 7.561

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.